30.05.2014 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64 BEFORE JERUSALEM FELL<br />

unto them: for he abode with them until the times of Trajan. And<br />

some of them saw not only John, but others also of the Apostles, and<br />

had this same account from them, and witness to the aforesaid relation.<br />

Whom ought we rather to believe? These, being such as they<br />

are, or Ptolemy, who never beheld the Apostles, nor ever in his dreams<br />

attained to any vestige of an Apostle? 72<br />

The careful detail he meticulously recounts in his argument, and<br />

the reference to the eyewitness accounts, should be noted. Yet, no<br />

respected New Testament scholar asserts that the biblical record<br />

allows for a fifteen year or more ministry for Christ, or of His having<br />

attained an age in excess of forty. We must vigorously assert that<br />

Irenaeus was “strangely mistaken about the age of Jesus.”7 3 As<br />

Selwyn notes in another connection regarding Irenaeus’s Against<br />

Here~ies (3:11:8): “Meanwhile as to Irenaeus, it must be owned that<br />

he is inevitably pursued by his own sayings. No man who has written<br />

down the statement, that there must be four gasps because there are<br />

four winds, can fairly hope to preserve the same reputation as a judge<br />

of evidence after it as be fore.”74<br />

Additional insights into obvious errors could be cited from Irenaeus.<br />

But the one cited should demonstrate clearly that he could (he<br />

did at least once!) err on matters of historical detail – even when he<br />

claimed the authority of eyewitness accounts.<br />

Irenaeus aJ the Fountain of Tradition<br />

It is surely the case that the external evidence stands as t/w<br />

strongest witness for the late dating of Revelation. But caution should<br />

forestall our wholehearted endorsement of that witness. Several scholars<br />

of note argue that the strong external witness to the late date of<br />

Revelation most likely may be traced back to Irenaeus’s lone witness.<br />

As Terry observes:<br />

It seems to us that no impartial mind can fail to see that [the extermd<br />

witness] preponderates in favor of the later date. But when we scrutinize<br />

the character and extent of this evidence, it seems equally clear<br />

that no very great stress can safely be laid upon it. For it all turns<br />

72. Irenaeus, Against Here&s 2:22:5.<br />

73. Scha~ Hirtoty 2:751.<br />

74. Edward C. Selwyn, Clmktian Pro,bhzti and & Pro@rAc A@ca~pse (London: Macmillan,<br />

1900), p. 125.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!