30.05.2014 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

230 BEFORE JERUSALEM FELL<br />

In an introductory synopsis of his epilogue, Brandon writes of the<br />

matter: “Christianity twice-born. The Jewish overthrow of A.D. 70<br />

emancipated the infant ftith from its Jewish cradle, thus making<br />

possible its career as a world-religion. . . . The destruction of<strong>Jerusalem</strong><br />

gave other cities decisive parts in the life of the Church, especially<br />

Rome. The Jewish catastrophe of A.D. 70 is probably the next most<br />

crucial event for Christianity after the Resurrection experiences.”35<br />

Bo Reicke writes that<br />

Despite the Zealot movement, the church thought it theologically and<br />

politically important to maintain a positive relationship with <strong>Jerusalem</strong><br />

and Judaism, until the martyrdom of James in 62, the growth of<br />

terrorism, and the first Jewish War finally forced a break with organized<br />

Judaism. This long association elucidated the connection between<br />

the Old and the New Covenant. It also facilitated the conversion<br />

ofJews and the growth of the Christian community in the Roman<br />

Empire, where, from the time of Caesar to that of Nero, the prohibition<br />

of associations did not apply to the Jews and therefore also not<br />

to the Christians.36<br />

Davies argues that the fall of <strong>Jerusalem</strong> made “absolute the<br />

divorce between Church and Synagogue,” and further that “traces<br />

of Jewish Christianity are to be found in the following centuries, but<br />

the fall of<strong>Jerusalem</strong> reduced them to a position of complete insignificance<br />

for the future history of the Church. “3 7<br />

Dix writes that “the transition was made, and quickly, in the ‘life<br />

of the Church.’ The events of A.D. 66-70 hastened the concluding<br />

stages.”3 8<br />

Frend states that “there can be little question of the members of<br />

the ‘new Israel’ desiring to break all links with the old in the period<br />

from 75 to 100.”3 9<br />

Other scholars can be consulted on this matter.w<br />

35. Brandon, Fall ofJem.mlem, p. xix.<br />

36. Bo Reicke, Tb New T~tameat Era: The World of the Bible From 500 B. C. to A.D. 100,<br />

trans. David E. Green (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1968), p. 211. See also comments on pages<br />

227,245,251.<br />

37. J. G. Davies, The Ear~ Chrirtian Church (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1965),<br />

p. 46.<br />

38. Dix, Jew and Greek, p. 111.<br />

39. Frend, Tle Rzse of Chtitianip, pp. 122-123.<br />

40. For example: J. C. I. Gieseler, Textbook of E2cle.sia.siical Hi-story, trans. Francis<br />

Cunningham, vol. 1 (Philadelphia Carey, Lea, and Blanchard, 1836), pp. 55, 62.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!