30.05.2014 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

Before Jerusalem Fell - EntreWave

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2<br />

THE APPROACH TO THE<br />

QUESTION OF DATING<br />

The Importance of Dating<br />

In several respects Revelation is reminiscent of the Old Testament<br />

book of Daniel: ( 1 ) Each is a prophetic work. (2) Each was<br />

written by a devout, God-fearing Jew in times of the author’s personal<br />

exile and national Jewish distress. (3) Each shares a frequent<br />

and very obvious stylistic similarity. (4) Revelation frequently draws<br />

from Daniel. 1 Indeed, Revelation is even recognized as a New Testament<br />

Daniel by some scholars. Mounce observes that “it is the NT<br />

counterpart to the OT apocalyptic book of Daniel.”2<br />

Beyond these significant similarities there are two other related<br />

issues that directly bear upon our major concern. One is that both<br />

have widely disputed dates argued by biblical scholars, dates that<br />

fall into two general classes: “late” and “early.” Whereas liberal<br />

scholars invariably argue for a late date for Daniel (i.e., during the<br />

Maccabean era), almost as invariably do conservatives argue for its<br />

early date (i.e., during the Babylonian exile).3 The division between<br />

1. Swete has observed that “there are certain books which [the author] uses with<br />

especial frequency; more than half his references to the Old Testament belong to the<br />

Psalms, the prophecies of Isaiah and Ezekiel, and the Book of Daniel, and in proportion<br />

to its length the Book of Daniel yields by far the greatest number” (Henry B. Swete,<br />

Cmsnuntury on Revelation [Grand Rapids: Kregel, [1906] 1977], p. cliii).<br />

2. Robert H. Mounce, Tlu Book of Revelation. New International Commentary on the<br />

New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977), p. 23. Cf. also John F. Walvoord, Tle<br />

Revelation ofJesus Christ: A Comrrwztary (Chicago: Moody, 1966), p. 122.<br />

3. As per most conservative scholars, for example: C. F. Keil and Franz Delitzsch,<br />

Btblical Comrn@ary on the Book of Daniel. Keil and Delitzsch Old Testament Commentaries<br />

(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, rep. 1975), p. 43ff.; Merrill F. Unger, lntrodzukr~ Guide tu th<br />

Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 195 1), pp. 394fE; E. J. Young, The Prophe~ of<br />

Damel (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1949), pp. 23R.; Young, An Introduction to thz Old<br />

Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1949), pp. 360ff.; and R. K. Harrison, Zntroductwn<br />

to the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1969), pp. 1110II<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!