30.05.2014 Views

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX C<br />

wheat, the children <strong>of</strong> God, now must operate in a<br />

world in which the tares, the unregenerate, are<br />

operating. <strong>The</strong> servants (angels) instantly recognize the<br />

difference, but they are told not to yank up the tares<br />

yet. Such a violent act would destroy the wheat by<br />

plowing up the field. To preserve the growing wheat,<br />

the owner allows the tares to develop. What is<br />

preserved is historical development. Only at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the world is a final separation made. Until then, for the<br />

sake <strong>of</strong> the wheat, the tares are not ripped out.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rain falls on both the wheat and the tares. <strong>The</strong> sun<br />

shines on both. <strong>The</strong> blight hits both, and so do the<br />

locusts. Common grace and common curse: the law <strong>of</strong><br />

God brings both in history. An important part <strong>of</strong><br />

historical development is man’s fulfillment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dominion covenant. New productive techniques can be<br />

implemented through the common grace <strong>of</strong> God, once<br />

the care <strong>of</strong> the field is entrusted to men. <strong>The</strong><br />

regularities <strong>of</strong> nature still play a role, but increasingly<br />

fertilizers, irrigation systems, regular care, scientific<br />

management, and even satellite surveys are part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

life <strong>of</strong> the field. Men exercise increasing dominion over<br />

the world. A question then arises: If the devil’s<br />

followers rule, will they care tenderly for the needs <strong>of</strong><br />

the godly? Will they exercise dominion for the benefit<br />

<strong>of</strong> the wheat, so to speak? On the other hand, will the<br />

tares be cared for by the Christians? If Christians rule,<br />

what happens to the unrighteous?<br />

This is the problem <strong>of</strong> differentiation in history. Men are<br />

not passive. <strong>The</strong>y are commanded to be active, to seek<br />

dominion over nature (Gen. 1:28; 9:1-7). <strong>The</strong>y are to<br />

manage the field. As both the good and the bad work<br />

out their God-ordained destinies, what kind <strong>of</strong><br />

development can be expected? Who prospers most, the<br />

saved or the lost? Who becomes dominant?<br />

<strong>The</strong> final separation comes at the end <strong>of</strong> time. Until<br />

then, the two groups must share the same world. If<br />

wheat and tares imply slow growth to maturity, then we<br />

have to conclude that the radically discontinuous<br />

event <strong>of</strong> separation will not mark the time <strong>of</strong> historical<br />

development. It is an event <strong>of</strong> the last day: the final<br />

judgment. It is a discontinuous event that is the<br />

capstone <strong>of</strong> historical continuity. <strong>The</strong> death and<br />

resurrection <strong>of</strong> Christ was the last historically<br />

significant event that properly can be said to be<br />

discontinuous (possibly the day <strong>of</strong> Pentecost could<br />

serve as the last earth-shaking, kingdom-shaking<br />

event). <strong>The</strong> next major eschatological discontinuity is<br />

the day <strong>of</strong> judgment. So we should expect growth in our<br />

era, the kind <strong>of</strong> growth indicated by the agricultural<br />

parables. 5<br />

What must be stressed is the element <strong>of</strong> continuous<br />

development. “<strong>The</strong> kingdom <strong>of</strong> heaven is like to a grain<br />

<strong>of</strong> mustard seed, which a man took and sowed in his<br />

field: Which indeed is the least <strong>of</strong> all seeds: but when it<br />

is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh<br />

a tree, so that the birds <strong>of</strong> the air come and lodge in the<br />

branches there<strong>of</strong>” (Matt. 13:31-32). As this kingdom<br />

comes into maturity, there is no physical separation<br />

between saved and lost. That total separation will come<br />

only at the end <strong>of</strong> time. <strong>The</strong>re can be major changes,<br />

even as the seasons speed up or retard growth, but we<br />

should not expect a radical separation.<br />

While I do not have the space to demonstrate the<br />

point, this means that the separation spoken <strong>of</strong> by<br />

premillennialists – the Rapture – is not in accord with<br />

the parables <strong>of</strong> the kingdom. <strong>The</strong> Rapture comes at the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> time. <strong>The</strong> “wheat” cannot be removed from the<br />

field until that final day, when we are caught up to meet<br />

Christ in the clouds (I <strong>The</strong>ss. 4:17). <strong>The</strong>re is indeed a<br />

Rapture, but it comes at the end <strong>of</strong> time – when the<br />

reapers (angels) harvest the wheat and the tares. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

is a Rapture, but it is a postmillennial Rapture. Why a<br />

postmillennial Rapture, the amillennialist may say?<br />

Why not simply point out that the Rapture comes at<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> time and let matters drop? <strong>The</strong> answer is<br />

important: We must deal with the question <strong>of</strong> the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the wheat and tares. We must see that<br />

this process <strong>of</strong> time leads to Christian victory on earth<br />

and in time.<br />

Knowledge and Dominion<br />

Isaiah 32 is a neglected portion <strong>of</strong> Scripture in our day.<br />

It informs us <strong>of</strong> a remarkable day that is coming. It is a<br />

day <strong>of</strong> “epistemological self-consciousness,” to use<br />

Cornelius Van Til’s phrase. It is a day when men will<br />

know God’s standards and apply them accurately to the<br />

historical situation. It is not a day beyond the final<br />

judgment, for it speaks <strong>of</strong> churls as well as liberal<br />

people. Yet it cannot be a day inaugurated by a radical<br />

separation between saved and lost (the Rapture), for<br />

such a separation comes only at the end <strong>of</strong> time. This<br />

day will come before Christ returns physically to earth<br />

in judgment. We read in the first eight verses:<br />

Behold, a king shall reign in righteousness, and princes<br />

shall rule in judgment. And a man shall be as an hiding place<br />

from the wind, and a covert from the tempest; as rivers <strong>of</strong><br />

water in a dry place, as the shadow <strong>of</strong> a great rock in a weary<br />

land. And the eyes <strong>of</strong> them that see shall not be dim, and the<br />

ears <strong>of</strong> them that hear shall hearken. <strong>The</strong> heart also <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rash shall understand knowledge, and the tongue <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stammerers shall be ready to speak plainly. <strong>The</strong> vile person<br />

shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be<br />

bountiful. For the vile person will speak villany, and his heart<br />

will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and to utter error<br />

against the Lord, to make empty the soul <strong>of</strong> the hungry, and<br />

he will cause the drink <strong>of</strong> the thirsty to fail. <strong>The</strong> instruments<br />

also <strong>of</strong> the churl are evil; he deviseth wicked devices to<br />

destroy the poor with lying words, even when the needy<br />

speaketh right. But the liberal deviseth liberal things: and by<br />

liberal things shall he stand.<br />

To repeat, “<strong>The</strong> vile person shall be no more called<br />

liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful” (v. 5). Churls<br />

persist in their churlishness; liberal men continue to be<br />

gracious. It does not say that all churls will be<br />

converted, but it also does not say that the liberals shall<br />

5. Gary North, Moses and Pharaoh: Dominion Religion vs. Power Religion (Tyler, Texas: Institute for Christian Economics, 1985), ch. 12: “Continuity and Revolution.”<br />

253

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!