Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive
Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive
Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7:4-8<br />
LEAH: Reuben Gad (from Zilpah)<br />
Simeon<br />
Asher (from Zilpah)<br />
Levi<br />
Issachar<br />
Judah<br />
Zebulun<br />
RACHEL: Dan (from Bilhah) Joseph<br />
Naphtali (from Bilhah) Benjamin<br />
When the prophet Ezekiel set forth his vision <strong>of</strong> the ideal Jerusalem, he too showed twelve gates, one for each tribe<br />
(Ezek. 48:30-35).<br />
At first glance, it does not seem to have much in<br />
common with St. John’s; yet once we view them<br />
together, they appear very close indeed. Ezekiel’s list is<br />
arranged very symmetrically.<br />
Ezekiel has divided Leah’s sons into two major groups <strong>of</strong><br />
three (“senior” and “junior”), balancing each other on<br />
north and south. Rachel’s two sons on the east are set<br />
across from Zilpah’s two sons on the west; and below<br />
each pair is one <strong>of</strong> Bilhah’s sons. Ezekiel has also<br />
brought Judah (the royal tribe) into the top row <strong>of</strong><br />
three by having him change places with Simeon.<br />
Farrer explains St. John’s revision <strong>of</strong> Ezekiel: “He makes<br />
a genuine three for Rachel, by substituting Manasseh’s<br />
name for Dan’s. In fact, the tribe <strong>of</strong> Joseph had become<br />
two tribes, Ephraim and Manasseh. Since Ephraim was<br />
Joseph’s principal heir, Joseph covers Ephraim;<br />
Manasseh is added. A by-product <strong>of</strong> this improvement<br />
is the disappearance from the list <strong>of</strong> Dan, one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Twelve. Perhaps it will not have displeased St. John; let<br />
Dan be the Judas <strong>of</strong> the patriarchs. Dan had, in fact, a<br />
dubious reputation (Gen. 49:17; Lev. 24:10-11; 1 Kings<br />
12:28-30; Jer. 4:15 and 8:16). In the end (Rev. 21:12-<br />
14), St. John puts the names <strong>of</strong> the apostles round the<br />
city, pairing them with the tribes. We cannot suppose<br />
that Iscariot’s name would stand there, any more than<br />
Dan’s.<br />
“<strong>The</strong>n, as to the artificial promotion <strong>of</strong> Judah: instead<br />
<strong>of</strong> exchanging Judah and Simeon, St. John simply puts<br />
Judah up two places. <strong>The</strong> result is that Levi, not<br />
Simeon, is pushed out <strong>of</strong> the first three. <strong>The</strong> alteration<br />
93