Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive
Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive
Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PUBLISHER’S PREFACE<br />
Publisher’s Preface<br />
by Gary North<br />
With his first book on eschatology, Paradise Restored, 1<br />
David Chilton launched an eschatological revival.<br />
“Revolution” would be too strong a word, for his<br />
viewpoint is an old one, stretching back to the early<br />
church. But overnight, Paradise Restored began to<br />
influence religious leaders and scholars who had<br />
believed that the Biblical case for cultural victory was<br />
dead – a relic <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century. Now comes<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Days</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Vengeance</strong>, a verse-by-verse exposition <strong>of</strong><br />
the toughest book in the Bible, the Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation.<br />
What was generalized in Paradise Restored is now<br />
supported with chapter and verse – indeed, lots and lots<br />
<strong>of</strong> chapters and verses. This book will become the new<br />
reference work on the Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation. Incredibly,<br />
Chilton’s style is so lively that few readers will even<br />
notice that the author has tossed a scholarly bombshell.<br />
<strong>The</strong> conservative Christian academic world will be<br />
speechless; Chilton has <strong>of</strong>fered a remarkable exegetical<br />
challenge to those who hold to the traditional rival<br />
eschatologies, which I label pessimillennialism.<br />
This is not just another boring commentary on the<br />
Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation. Even if it were only that, it would<br />
be a major event, for the publication <strong>of</strong> any<br />
conservative, Bible-believing commentary on the Book<br />
<strong>of</strong> Revelation is a major event. W. Hendrikson’s<br />
amillennial commentary, More Than Conquerors, was<br />
published in 1940, and is less than half the size <strong>of</strong> this<br />
one, and not in the same league in terms <strong>of</strong> Biblical<br />
scholarship. John Walvoord’s <strong>The</strong> Revelation <strong>of</strong> Jesus<br />
Christ is now over two decades old, and it, too, is only<br />
half the size <strong>of</strong> Chilton’s. Despite all the fascination<br />
with Biblical prophecy in the twentieth century, fulllength<br />
commentaries on this most prophetic <strong>of</strong> Biblical<br />
books are rare.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y always have been rare. Few commentators have<br />
dared to explain the book. John Calvin taught through<br />
all the books <strong>of</strong> the Bible, save one: Revelation. Martin<br />
Luther wrote something in the range <strong>of</strong> a hundred<br />
volumes <strong>of</strong> material – as much or more than Calvin –<br />
but he didn’t write a commentary on Revelation. Moses<br />
Stuart wrote a great one in the mid-nineteenth century,<br />
but it is forgotten today. <strong>The</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation has<br />
resisted almost all previous attempts to unlock its secret<br />
<strong>of</strong> secrets. Now David Chilton has discovered this<br />
secret, this long-lost key that unlocks the code.<br />
This long-ignored key is the Old Testament.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Old Testament Background<br />
“Very funny,” you may be saying to yourself. All right, I<br />
will admit it: it is funny – funny peculiar, not funny ha,<br />
ha. What Chilton does is to go back again and again to<br />
the Old Testament in order to make sense <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Apostle John’s frame <strong>of</strong> reference. This technique<br />
works. It is the only technique that does work!<br />
Those who have never worked personally with Chilton<br />
cannot readily appreciate his detailed knowledge <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Bible, especially the Old Testament. I used him dozens<br />
<strong>of</strong> times as my personal concordance. He worked in the<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice next to mine. I would yell to him: “Hey, David,<br />
do you know where I can find the passage about . . . ?”<br />
I would relate a smattering <strong>of</strong> a Bible story, or some<br />
disjointed verse that was rattling around in my memory,<br />
and he would almost instantly tell me the chapter. He<br />
might or might not get the exact verse; usually, he was<br />
within three or four verses. That was always close<br />
enough. Rare was the occasion when he could not<br />
think <strong>of</strong> it; even then he would putter around in his<br />
extensive personal library until he found it. It never<br />
took him long.<br />
In this book, he has taken his remarkable memory <strong>of</strong><br />
the Old Testament, and he has fused it with an<br />
interpretive technique developed by James Jordan in<br />
his book, Judges: God’s War Against Humanism (1985). 2<br />
Jordan works with dozens <strong>of</strong> Old Testament symbols<br />
that he has sifted from the historical narratives and the<br />
descriptions <strong>of</strong> the Tabernacle and Temple. <strong>The</strong>n he<br />
applies these symbols and models to other parallel Bible<br />
stories, including the New Testament’s account <strong>of</strong> the<br />
life <strong>of</strong> Christ and the early church. No one does this<br />
better than Jordan, but Chilton has successfully applied<br />
this Biblical hermeneutic (principle <strong>of</strong> interpretation)<br />
to the Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation in many creative ways.<br />
Chilton is not the first expositor to do this, as his<br />
footnotes and appendixes reveal, but he is unquestionably<br />
the best at it that the Christian church has yet<br />
produced with respect to the Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se Old Testament background stories and symbols<br />
make sense <strong>of</strong> the difficult passages in Revelation. He<br />
makes clear the many connections between Old and<br />
New Testament symbolic language and historical<br />
references. This is why his commentary is so easy to<br />
read, despite the magnitude <strong>of</strong> what he has<br />
accomplished academically.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Missing Piece: <strong>The</strong> Covenant Structure<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was a missing piece in the puzzle, however, and<br />
this kept the book in Chilton’s computer for an extra<br />
year, at least. That missing piece was identified in the<br />
fall <strong>of</strong> 1985 by Pastor Ray Sutton. Sutton had been<br />
seriously burned in a kitchen accident, and his mobility<br />
had been drastically reduced. He was working on a<br />
manuscript on the symbolism <strong>of</strong> the sacraments, when<br />
a crucial connection occurred to him. <strong>The</strong> connection<br />
was supplied by Westminster Seminary Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />
Meredith G. Kline. Years earlier, he had read Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />
Kline’s studies on the ancient suzerainty (kingly)<br />
treaties <strong>of</strong> the ancient Near East. 3 Pagan kings would<br />
establish covenants with their vassals. Kline had<br />
pointed out that these treaties paralleled the structure<br />
1. David Chilton, Paradise Restored: A Biblical <strong>The</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> Dominion (Ft.<br />
Worth: Dominion Press, 1985).<br />
2. Tyler, Texas: Geneva Ministries, 1985.<br />
3. Kline, Treaty <strong>of</strong> the Great King (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1963); reprinted<br />
in part in his later book, <strong>The</strong> Structure <strong>of</strong> Biblical Authority (Grand Rapids:<br />
Eerdmans, 1972).<br />
8