30.05.2014 Views

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PUBLISHER’S PREFACE<br />

Publisher’s Preface<br />

by Gary North<br />

With his first book on eschatology, Paradise Restored, 1<br />

David Chilton launched an eschatological revival.<br />

“Revolution” would be too strong a word, for his<br />

viewpoint is an old one, stretching back to the early<br />

church. But overnight, Paradise Restored began to<br />

influence religious leaders and scholars who had<br />

believed that the Biblical case for cultural victory was<br />

dead – a relic <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century. Now comes<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Days</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Vengeance</strong>, a verse-by-verse exposition <strong>of</strong><br />

the toughest book in the Bible, the Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation.<br />

What was generalized in Paradise Restored is now<br />

supported with chapter and verse – indeed, lots and lots<br />

<strong>of</strong> chapters and verses. This book will become the new<br />

reference work on the Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation. Incredibly,<br />

Chilton’s style is so lively that few readers will even<br />

notice that the author has tossed a scholarly bombshell.<br />

<strong>The</strong> conservative Christian academic world will be<br />

speechless; Chilton has <strong>of</strong>fered a remarkable exegetical<br />

challenge to those who hold to the traditional rival<br />

eschatologies, which I label pessimillennialism.<br />

This is not just another boring commentary on the<br />

Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation. Even if it were only that, it would<br />

be a major event, for the publication <strong>of</strong> any<br />

conservative, Bible-believing commentary on the Book<br />

<strong>of</strong> Revelation is a major event. W. Hendrikson’s<br />

amillennial commentary, More Than Conquerors, was<br />

published in 1940, and is less than half the size <strong>of</strong> this<br />

one, and not in the same league in terms <strong>of</strong> Biblical<br />

scholarship. John Walvoord’s <strong>The</strong> Revelation <strong>of</strong> Jesus<br />

Christ is now over two decades old, and it, too, is only<br />

half the size <strong>of</strong> Chilton’s. Despite all the fascination<br />

with Biblical prophecy in the twentieth century, fulllength<br />

commentaries on this most prophetic <strong>of</strong> Biblical<br />

books are rare.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y always have been rare. Few commentators have<br />

dared to explain the book. John Calvin taught through<br />

all the books <strong>of</strong> the Bible, save one: Revelation. Martin<br />

Luther wrote something in the range <strong>of</strong> a hundred<br />

volumes <strong>of</strong> material – as much or more than Calvin –<br />

but he didn’t write a commentary on Revelation. Moses<br />

Stuart wrote a great one in the mid-nineteenth century,<br />

but it is forgotten today. <strong>The</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation has<br />

resisted almost all previous attempts to unlock its secret<br />

<strong>of</strong> secrets. Now David Chilton has discovered this<br />

secret, this long-lost key that unlocks the code.<br />

This long-ignored key is the Old Testament.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Old Testament Background<br />

“Very funny,” you may be saying to yourself. All right, I<br />

will admit it: it is funny – funny peculiar, not funny ha,<br />

ha. What Chilton does is to go back again and again to<br />

the Old Testament in order to make sense <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Apostle John’s frame <strong>of</strong> reference. This technique<br />

works. It is the only technique that does work!<br />

Those who have never worked personally with Chilton<br />

cannot readily appreciate his detailed knowledge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bible, especially the Old Testament. I used him dozens<br />

<strong>of</strong> times as my personal concordance. He worked in the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice next to mine. I would yell to him: “Hey, David,<br />

do you know where I can find the passage about . . . ?”<br />

I would relate a smattering <strong>of</strong> a Bible story, or some<br />

disjointed verse that was rattling around in my memory,<br />

and he would almost instantly tell me the chapter. He<br />

might or might not get the exact verse; usually, he was<br />

within three or four verses. That was always close<br />

enough. Rare was the occasion when he could not<br />

think <strong>of</strong> it; even then he would putter around in his<br />

extensive personal library until he found it. It never<br />

took him long.<br />

In this book, he has taken his remarkable memory <strong>of</strong><br />

the Old Testament, and he has fused it with an<br />

interpretive technique developed by James Jordan in<br />

his book, Judges: God’s War Against Humanism (1985). 2<br />

Jordan works with dozens <strong>of</strong> Old Testament symbols<br />

that he has sifted from the historical narratives and the<br />

descriptions <strong>of</strong> the Tabernacle and Temple. <strong>The</strong>n he<br />

applies these symbols and models to other parallel Bible<br />

stories, including the New Testament’s account <strong>of</strong> the<br />

life <strong>of</strong> Christ and the early church. No one does this<br />

better than Jordan, but Chilton has successfully applied<br />

this Biblical hermeneutic (principle <strong>of</strong> interpretation)<br />

to the Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation in many creative ways.<br />

Chilton is not the first expositor to do this, as his<br />

footnotes and appendixes reveal, but he is unquestionably<br />

the best at it that the Christian church has yet<br />

produced with respect to the Book <strong>of</strong> Revelation.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se Old Testament background stories and symbols<br />

make sense <strong>of</strong> the difficult passages in Revelation. He<br />

makes clear the many connections between Old and<br />

New Testament symbolic language and historical<br />

references. This is why his commentary is so easy to<br />

read, despite the magnitude <strong>of</strong> what he has<br />

accomplished academically.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Missing Piece: <strong>The</strong> Covenant Structure<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was a missing piece in the puzzle, however, and<br />

this kept the book in Chilton’s computer for an extra<br />

year, at least. That missing piece was identified in the<br />

fall <strong>of</strong> 1985 by Pastor Ray Sutton. Sutton had been<br />

seriously burned in a kitchen accident, and his mobility<br />

had been drastically reduced. He was working on a<br />

manuscript on the symbolism <strong>of</strong> the sacraments, when<br />

a crucial connection occurred to him. <strong>The</strong> connection<br />

was supplied by Westminster Seminary Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />

Meredith G. Kline. Years earlier, he had read Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />

Kline’s studies on the ancient suzerainty (kingly)<br />

treaties <strong>of</strong> the ancient Near East. 3 Pagan kings would<br />

establish covenants with their vassals. Kline had<br />

pointed out that these treaties paralleled the structure<br />

1. David Chilton, Paradise Restored: A Biblical <strong>The</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> Dominion (Ft.<br />

Worth: Dominion Press, 1985).<br />

2. Tyler, Texas: Geneva Ministries, 1985.<br />

3. Kline, Treaty <strong>of</strong> the Great King (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1963); reprinted<br />

in part in his later book, <strong>The</strong> Structure <strong>of</strong> Biblical Authority (Grand Rapids:<br />

Eerdmans, 1972).<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!