30.05.2014 Views

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX C<br />

creeds and theological understanding necessarily lead<br />

to impotence culturally? Nonsense! It was the<br />

Reformation that made possible modern science and<br />

technology.<br />

On the other side <strong>of</strong> the field – indeed, right next to the<br />

wheat – self-awareness by unbelievers also increases.<br />

But they do not always become more convinced <strong>of</strong> their<br />

roots in chaos. <strong>The</strong> Renaissance was successful in<br />

swallowing up the fruits <strong>of</strong> the Reformation only to the<br />

extent that it was a pale reflection <strong>of</strong> the Reformation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Renaissance leaders rapidly abandoned the magiccharged,<br />

demonically inspired magicians like Giordano<br />

Bruno. 20 <strong>The</strong>y may have kept the humanism <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Bruno, but after 1600, the open commitment to the<br />

demonic receded. In its place came rationalism, Deism,<br />

and the logic <strong>of</strong> an orderly world. <strong>The</strong>y used stolen<br />

premises and gained power. So compelling was this<br />

vision <strong>of</strong> mathematically autonomous reality that<br />

Christians like Cotton Mather hailed the new science<br />

<strong>of</strong> Newtonian mechanics as essentially Christian. It was<br />

so close to Christian views <strong>of</strong> God’s orderly being and<br />

the creation’s reflection <strong>of</strong> His orderliness, that the<br />

Christians unhesitatingly embraced the new science.<br />

What we see, then, is that the Christians were not fully<br />

self-conscious epistemologically, and neither were the<br />

pagans. In the time <strong>of</strong> the apostles, there was greater<br />

epistemological awareness among the leaders <strong>of</strong> both<br />

sides. <strong>The</strong> church was persecuted, and it won. <strong>The</strong>n<br />

there was a lapse into muddled thinking on both sides.<br />

<strong>The</strong> attempt, for example, <strong>of</strong> Julian the Apostate to<br />

revive paganism late in the fourth century was<br />

ludicrous – it was half-hearted paganism, at best. Two<br />

centuries earlier, Marcus Aurelius, a true philosopherking<br />

in the tradition <strong>of</strong> Plato, had been a major<br />

persecutor <strong>of</strong> Christians; Justin Martyr died under his<br />

years as emperor. But his debauched son, Commodus,<br />

was too busy with his 300 female concubines and 300<br />

males 21 to bother about systematic persecutions. Who<br />

was more self-conscious, epistemologically speaking?<br />

Aurelius still had the light <strong>of</strong> reason before him; his son<br />

was immersed in the religion <strong>of</strong> revolution – culturally<br />

impotent. He was more willing than his philosopherpersecutor<br />

father to follow the logic <strong>of</strong> his satanic faith.<br />

He preferred debauchery to power. Commodus was<br />

assassinated 13 years after he became Emperor. <strong>The</strong><br />

Senate resolved that his name be execrated. 22<br />

If a modern investigator would like to see as fully<br />

consistent a pagan culture as one might imagine, he<br />

could visit the African tribe, the Ik. Colin TurnbuIl<br />

did, and his book, <strong>The</strong> Mountain People (1973), is a<br />

classic. He found almost total rebellion against law –<br />

family law, civic law, all law. Yet he also found a totally<br />

impotent, beaten people who were rapidly becoming<br />

extinct. <strong>The</strong>y were harmless to the West because they<br />

were more self-consistent than the West’s satanists.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Marxist Challenge<br />

Marxists, on the other hand, are a threat. <strong>The</strong>y believe<br />

in linear history (<strong>of</strong>ficially, anyway – their system is at<br />

bottom cyclical, however). 23 <strong>The</strong>y believe in law. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

believe in destiny. <strong>The</strong>y believe in historical meaning.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y believe in historical stages, though not ethically<br />

determined stages such as we find in Deuteronomy.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y believe in science. <strong>The</strong>y believe in literature,<br />

propaganda, and the power <strong>of</strong> the written word. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

believe in higher education. In short, they have a<br />

philosophy which is a kind <strong>of</strong> perverse mirror image <strong>of</strong><br />

Christian orthodoxy. <strong>The</strong>y are dangerous, not because<br />

they are acting consistently with their ultimate<br />

philosophy <strong>of</strong> chaos, but because they limit the<br />

function <strong>of</strong> chaos to one area alone: the revolutionary<br />

transformation <strong>of</strong> bourgeois culture. (I am speaking<br />

here primarily <strong>of</strong> Soviet Marxists.)<br />

And where are they winning converts? In the<br />

increasingly impotent, increasingly existentialist,<br />

increasingly antinomian West. Until the West<br />

abandoned its remnant <strong>of</strong> Christian culture, Marxism<br />

could flourish only in the underdeveloped, basically<br />

pagan areas <strong>of</strong> the world. An essentially Western<br />

philosophy <strong>of</strong> optimism found converts among the<br />

intellectuals <strong>of</strong> the Far East, Africa, and Latin America,<br />

who saw the fruitlessness <strong>of</strong> Confucian stagnation and<br />

relativism, the impotence <strong>of</strong> demonic ritual, or the<br />

dead-end nature <strong>of</strong> demon worship. Marxism is<br />

powerful only to the extent that it has the trappings <strong>of</strong><br />

Augustinianism, coupled with subsidies, especially<br />

technological subsidies and long-term credit, from<br />

Western industry.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is irony here. Marx believed that “scientific<br />

socialism” would triumph only in those nations that<br />

had experienced the full development <strong>of</strong> capitalism. He<br />

believed that in most cases (possibly excepting Russia),<br />

rural areas had to abandon feudalism and develop a<br />

fully capitalist culture before the socialist revolution<br />

would be successful. Yet it was primarily in the rural<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> the world that Marxist ideas and groups were<br />

first successful. <strong>The</strong> industrialized West was still too<br />

Christian or too pragmatic (recognizing that “honesty<br />

is the best policy”) to capitulate to the Marxists, except<br />

immediately following a lost war.<br />

Marxists have long dominated the faculties <strong>of</strong> Latin<br />

American universities, but not U.S. universities. In<br />

1964, for example, there were not half a dozen<br />

outspoken Marxist economists teaching in American<br />

universities (and possibly as few as one, Stanford’s Paul<br />

Baran). Since 1965, however, New Left scholars <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Marxist persuasion have become a force to be reckoned<br />

with in all the social sciences, including economics. 24<br />

<strong>The</strong> skepticism, pessimism, relativism, and irrelevance<br />

20. On the magic <strong>of</strong> the early Renaissance, see Frances Yates, Giordano Bruno and<br />

the Hermetic Tradition (New York: Vintage, [1964] 1969).<br />

21. Edward Gibbon, <strong>The</strong> History <strong>of</strong> the Decline and Fall <strong>of</strong> the Roman Empire,<br />

Milman edition, 5 Vols. (Philadelphia: Porter& Coates, [1776]), I, p. 144.<br />

22. Ethelbert Stauffer, Christ and the Caesars (Philadelphia: Westminster Press,<br />

1955), p. 223.<br />

23. Gary North, Marx’s Religion <strong>of</strong> Revolution: <strong>The</strong> Doctrine <strong>of</strong> Creative Destruction<br />

(Nutley, New Jersey: Craig Press, 1968), pp. 100-1.<br />

262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!