30.05.2014 Views

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX C<br />

In the era prophesied by Isaiah, unbelievers will once<br />

again come to know the benefits <strong>of</strong> God’s law. No<br />

longer shall they twist God’s revelation to them. <strong>The</strong><br />

churl shall no longer be called liberal. Law will be<br />

respected by unbelievers. This means that they will<br />

turn away from an open, consistent worship <strong>of</strong> the gods<br />

<strong>of</strong> chaos and the philosophy <strong>of</strong> ultimate randomness,<br />

including evolutionary randomness. <strong>The</strong>y will<br />

participate in the blessings brought to them by the<br />

preaching <strong>of</strong> the whole counsel <strong>of</strong> God, including His<br />

law. <strong>The</strong> earth will be subdued to the glory <strong>of</strong> God,<br />

including the cultural world. Unbelievers will fulfil<br />

their roles in the achievement <strong>of</strong> the terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dominion covenant.<br />

This is why a theology that is orthodox must include a<br />

doctrine <strong>of</strong> common grace that is intimately related to<br />

biblical law. Law does not save men’s souls, but it does<br />

save their bodies and their culture. Christ is the savior <strong>of</strong><br />

all, especially those who are the elect (I Tim. 4:10).<br />

Antinomian Revivalism vs. Reconstruction<br />

<strong>The</strong> blessings and cultural victory taught by the Bible<br />

(and adequately commented upon by postmillennialists)<br />

will not be the products <strong>of</strong> some form <strong>of</strong> pietistic,<br />

semi-monastic revivalism. <strong>The</strong> “merely soteriological”<br />

preaching <strong>of</strong> pietism – the salvation <strong>of</strong> souls by special<br />

grace – is not sufficient to bring the victories foretold in<br />

the Bible. <strong>The</strong> whole counsel <strong>of</strong> God must and will be<br />

preached. This means that the law <strong>of</strong> God will be<br />

preached. <strong>The</strong> external blessings will come in response<br />

to covenantal faithfulness <strong>of</strong> God’s people. <strong>The</strong><br />

majority <strong>of</strong> men will be converted. <strong>The</strong> unconverted<br />

will not follow their philosophy <strong>of</strong> chaos to logical<br />

conclusions, for such a philosophy leads to ultimate<br />

impotence. It throws away the tool <strong>of</strong> reconstruction,<br />

biblical law.<br />

<strong>The</strong> great defect with the postmillennial revival<br />

inaugurated by Jonathan Edwards and his followers in<br />

the eighteenth century was their neglect <strong>of</strong> biblical law.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y expected to see the blessings <strong>of</strong> God come as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> merely soteriological preaching. Look at<br />

Edwards’ Treatise on the Religious Affections. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />

nothing on the law <strong>of</strong> God in culture. Page after page is<br />

filled with the words “sweet” and “sweetness.” A<br />

diabetic reader is almost risking a relapse by reading<br />

this book in one sitting. <strong>The</strong> words sometimes appear<br />

four or five times on a page. And while Edwards was<br />

preaching the sweetness <strong>of</strong> God, Arminian semiliterates<br />

were “hot-gospeling” the Holy Commonwealth<br />

<strong>of</strong> Connecticut into political antinomianism. 13<br />

Where sweetness and emotional hot flashes are<br />

concerned, Calvinistic preaching is no match for<br />

antinomian sermons. <strong>The</strong> hoped-for revival <strong>of</strong> the<br />

1700s became the Arminian revivals <strong>of</strong> the early 1800s,<br />

leaving emotionally burned-over districts, cults, and<br />

the abolitionist movement as their devastating legacy.<br />

Because the postmillennial preaching <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Edwardians was culturally antinomian and pietistic, it<br />

crippled the remnants <strong>of</strong> Calvinistic political order in<br />

the New England colonies, helping to produce a<br />

vacuum that Arminianism and then Unitarianism<br />

filled.<br />

Progress culturally, economically, and politically is<br />

intimately linked to the extension and application <strong>of</strong><br />

biblical law. <strong>The</strong> blessings promised in Romans,<br />

chapter eleven, concerning the effects <strong>of</strong> the promised<br />

conversion <strong>of</strong> Israel (not necessarily the state <strong>of</strong> Israel)<br />

to the gospel, will be in part the product <strong>of</strong> biblical<br />

law. 14 But these blessings do not necessarily include<br />

universal regeneration. <strong>The</strong> blessings only require the<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> Christian culture. For the long-term<br />

progress <strong>of</strong> culture, <strong>of</strong> course, this increase <strong>of</strong> common<br />

grace (or reduction <strong>of</strong> the common curse) must be<br />

reinforced (rejuvenated and renewed) by special grace<br />

– conversions. But the blessings can remain for a<br />

generation or more after special grace has been<br />

removed, and as far as the external benefits can be<br />

measured, it will not be possible to tell whether the<br />

blessings are part <strong>of</strong> the positive feedback program (Deut.<br />

8:18) or a prelude to God’s judgment (Deut. 8:19-20).<br />

God respects His conditional, external covenants.<br />

External conformity to His law gains external blessings.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se, in the last analysis (and at the last judgment),<br />

produce coals for unregenerate heads.<br />

Universal Regeneration?<br />

<strong>The</strong> postmillennial system requires a doctrine <strong>of</strong><br />

common grace and common curse. It does not require a<br />

doctrine <strong>of</strong> universal regeneration during the period <strong>of</strong><br />

millennial blessings. In fact, no postmillennial<br />

Calvinist can afford to be without a doctrine <strong>of</strong><br />

common grace – one which links external blessings to<br />

the fulfillment <strong>of</strong> external covenants.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re has to be a period <strong>of</strong> external blessings during the<br />

final generation. Something must hold that culture<br />

together so that Satan can once again go forth and<br />

13. On the opposition to Edwards’ toleration <strong>of</strong> revivalism, not from theological<br />

liberals but from orthodox Calvinistic pastors, see Richard L. Bushman, From<br />

Puritan to Yankee (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press,<br />

1967). Bushman also explains how the Great Awakening was a disaster for<br />

the legal remnants <strong>of</strong> biblical law in the colony <strong>of</strong> Connecticut. <strong>The</strong> political<br />

order was forced into theological neutralism, which in turn aided the rise <strong>of</strong><br />

Deism and liberalism.<br />

14. John Murray’s excellent commentary, <strong>The</strong> Epistle to the Romans (Grand<br />

Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1965), contains an extensive analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

Romans 11, the section dealing with the future conversion <strong>of</strong> the Jews.<br />

Murray stresses that God’s redrafting in <strong>of</strong> Israel leads to covenantal blessings<br />

unparalleled in human history. But the Israel referred to in Romans 11, argues<br />

Murray, is not national or political Israel, but the natural seed <strong>of</strong> Abraham.<br />

This seems to mean genetic Israel.<br />

A major historical problem appears at this point. <strong>The</strong>re is some evidence<br />

(though not conclusive) that the bulk <strong>of</strong> those known today as Askenazi Jews<br />

are the heirs <strong>of</strong> a converted tribe <strong>of</strong> Turkish people, the Khazars. It is wellknown<br />

among European history scholars that such a conversion took place<br />

around 740 A.D. <strong>The</strong> Eastern European and Russian Jews may have come<br />

from this stock. <strong>The</strong>y have married other Jews, however: the Sephardic or<br />

diaspora Jews who fled primarily to western Europe. <strong>The</strong> Yemenite Jews, who<br />

stayed in the land <strong>of</strong> Palestine, also are descendants <strong>of</strong> Abraham. <strong>The</strong><br />

counter-evidence against this thesis <strong>of</strong> the Khazars as modern Jews is<br />

primarily linguistic: Yiddish does not bear traces <strong>of</strong> any Turkic language. On<br />

the kingdom <strong>of</strong> the Khazars, see Arthur Koestler, <strong>The</strong> Thirteenth Tribe: <strong>The</strong><br />

Khazar Empire and Its Heritage (New York: Random House, 1976).<br />

If the Israel referred to in Romans 11 is primarily genetic, then it may not be<br />

necessary that all Jews be converted. What, then, is the Jew in Romans 11?<br />

Covenantal? I wrote to Murray in the late 1960s to get his opinion on the<br />

implications <strong>of</strong> the Khazars for his exegesis <strong>of</strong> Romans 11, but he did not<br />

respond.<br />

259

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!