30.05.2014 Views

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

Days of Vengeance - The Preterist Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3:21-22<br />

the elders <strong>of</strong> a church, and turn it into a watered-down,<br />

Arminian request from a weak and helpless deity who<br />

is at the mercy <strong>of</strong> man. We must remember that Christ<br />

is speaking here as the Amen, the faithful and true<br />

Witness, the Creator and Sovereign Lord <strong>of</strong> all. He is<br />

not making a feeble plea, as if He did not rule history<br />

and predestine its most minute details; He is the King<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kings, who makes war on His enemies and damns<br />

them to everlasting flames. Nor is he speaking to people<br />

in general, for He is directing His message to His<br />

Church; nor, again, is he simply speaking to Christians<br />

as individuals, but to Christians as members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Church. This verse cannot be made to serve the<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> Arminian, subjective individualism without<br />

violently wrenching it from its covenantal and textual<br />

context. 19<br />

Nevertheless, there is a distortion on the other side<br />

that is just as serious. It will not do merely to point out<br />

the failures <strong>of</strong> Arminians to deal satisfactorily with this<br />

text, for Calvinists have traditionally been at fault here<br />

as well. Reformed worship tends to be overly intellectual,<br />

centered around preaching. In the name <strong>of</strong> being<br />

centered around the Word, it is actually <strong>of</strong>ten centered<br />

around the intellect. Reformed rationalism has thus<br />

produced its equal and opposite reaction in Arminian<br />

revivalism, irrationalism, and anti-intellectualism.<br />

People have fled the barren, overly intellectual<br />

emphasis <strong>of</strong> Reformed worship and have run into the<br />

anti-theology heresies <strong>of</strong> what is unfortunately known<br />

as evangelicalism (which has, indeed, precious little <strong>of</strong><br />

the original evangel). 20<br />

What is the answer? We must take seriously the Biblical<br />

doctrine <strong>of</strong> the Real Presence <strong>of</strong> Christ in the sacrament<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Eucharist. We must return to the Biblical<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> worship centered on Jesus Christ, which<br />

means the weekly celebration <strong>of</strong> the Lord’s Supper, as<br />

well as instruction about its true meaning and<br />

efficacy. 21 We must abandon the rank platonism which<br />

informs our bare, intellectualized worship, and return<br />

to a truly corporate, liturgical worship characterized by<br />

artistic beauty and musical excellence. 22<br />

For it should be obvious that in this verse He is<br />

extending to the Church an <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> renewed<br />

communion with Himself. <strong>The</strong> very heart and center <strong>of</strong><br />

our fellowship with Christ is at His table (i.e., our<br />

earthly table which He has made His). <strong>The</strong> most basic,<br />

and most pr<strong>of</strong>ound, <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> salvation is Christ’s <strong>of</strong>fer to<br />

dine with us. In Holy Communion we are genuinely<br />

having dinner with Jesus, lifted up into His heavenly<br />

presence; and, moreover, we are feasting on Him:<br />

Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Son <strong>of</strong> Man and drink His blood, you have no life in<br />

yourselves. He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood<br />

has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. For<br />

My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink. He who<br />

eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in<br />

Him. As the living Father sent Me, and I live because <strong>of</strong><br />

the Father, so he who eats Me, he also shall live because<br />

<strong>of</strong> Me. (John 6:53-57)<br />

21-22 <strong>The</strong> final promise to the overcomer is a promise<br />

<strong>of</strong> dominion with Christ: I will grant to him to sit<br />

down with Me on My Throne, as I also overcame and<br />

sat down with My Father on His Throne. Is this only<br />

a future hope? Assuredly not. <strong>The</strong> privilege <strong>of</strong> ruling<br />

with Christ belongs to all Christians, in time and on<br />

earth, although the dominion is progressive through<br />

history until the final consummation. But Christ has<br />

entered upon His Kingdom already (Col. 1:13); He has<br />

disarmed Satan and the demons already (Col. 2:15);<br />

and we are kings and priests with Him already (Rev.<br />

1:6); and just as He conquered, so we are to go forth,<br />

conquering in His name. He reigns now (Acts 2:29-<br />

36), above all creation (Eph. 1:20-22), with all power<br />

in heaven and in earth (Matt. 28:18-20), and is<br />

engaged now in putting all enemies under His feet (1<br />

Cor. 15:25), until His kingdom becomes a great<br />

mountain, filling the whole earth (Dan. 2:35, 45).<br />

We have thus been faced again and again in these<br />

messages to the churches with the fundamental<br />

command <strong>of</strong> Revelation, that which St. John<br />

admonished us to keep (1:3): Overcome! Conquer! Even<br />

aside from the fact that the prophecy is not about the<br />

twentieth century, we will miss its point if we<br />

concentrate on persecutions or emperor-worship in the<br />

same way that the Hal Lindseys <strong>of</strong> this age concentrate<br />

on oil embargoes, common markets and hydrogen<br />

bombs: the basic message is about none <strong>of</strong> these, but<br />

rather about the duty <strong>of</strong> the Church to conquer the<br />

world. R. J. Rushdoony has well said: “<strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

this vision is to give comfort and assurance <strong>of</strong> victory to<br />

the Church, not to confirm their fears or the threats <strong>of</strong><br />

the enemy. To read Revelation as other than the<br />

triumph <strong>of</strong> the kingdom <strong>of</strong> God in time and eternity is<br />

to deny the very essence <strong>of</strong> its meaning.” 23<br />

<strong>The</strong> great failure <strong>of</strong> what is commonly known as<br />

“amillennialism” is its unwillingness to come to terms<br />

with these dominical implications <strong>of</strong> the mediatorial<br />

reign <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ, <strong>The</strong> New Testament writers<br />

constantly urge God’s people to “overcome” in the light<br />

<strong>of</strong> Christ’s definitive victory. Having been recreated in<br />

His image, according to His likeness (Eph. 4:24; Col.<br />

19. Of course, the Lord <strong>of</strong>fers Himself to people outside the Kingdom as well:<br />

Even the dogs are given crumbs from the children’s table (Matt. 15:21-28);<br />

and the king in Christ’s parable (Luke 14:23) sent his servants out to compel<br />

the Gentiles to come in. But Christ’s <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> salvation is never made outside<br />

the context <strong>of</strong> the Covenant, the Kingdom, and the Church.<br />

20. See James B. Jordan’s essay “Holistic Evangelism” in his Sociology <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Church (Tyler, TX: Geneva Ministries, 1986).<br />

21. See Geddes MacGregor, Corpus Christi: <strong>The</strong> Nature <strong>of</strong> the Church According to<br />

the Reformed Tradition (Philadelphia: <strong>The</strong> Westminster Press, 1958); and<br />

Ronald S. Wallace, Calvin’s Doctrine <strong>of</strong> the Word and Sacrament (Tyler, TX:<br />

Geneva Ministries, [1953] 1982).<br />

22. One <strong>of</strong> the most helpful books on worship from a Reformed perspective is<br />

Richard Paquier, Dynamics <strong>of</strong> Worship: Foundations and Uses <strong>of</strong> Liturgy<br />

(Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1967). For viewpoints from other traditions see<br />

Louis Bouyer, Liturgical Piety (University <strong>of</strong> Notre Dame Press, 1955); Josef<br />

A. Jungmann, S. J., <strong>The</strong> Early Liturgy to the Time <strong>of</strong> Gregory the Great<br />

(University <strong>of</strong> Notre Dame Press, 1959); Alexander Schmemann,<br />

Introduction to Liturgical <strong>The</strong>ology (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary<br />

Press, 1966); Luther D. Reed, <strong>The</strong> Lutheran Liturgy (Philadelphia:<br />

Muhlenberg Press, 1947); Massey H. Shepherd Jr., <strong>The</strong> Worship <strong>of</strong> the Church<br />

(Greenwich, CT: <strong>The</strong> Seabury Press, 1952); and Cheslyn Jones et al., eds.,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Study <strong>of</strong> Liturgy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978).<br />

23. Rousas John Rushdoony, Thy Kingdom Come: Studies in Daniel and<br />

Revelation (Tyler, TX: Thoburn Press, [1970] 1978), p. 90.<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!