31.10.2012 Views

Chitosan Loaded Mucoadhesive Microspheres of Gliclazide - Journal

Chitosan Loaded Mucoadhesive Microspheres of Gliclazide - Journal

Chitosan Loaded Mucoadhesive Microspheres of Gliclazide - Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Prostaglandin-E induced enteropooling model:<br />

2<br />

Table:2 Effect <strong>of</strong> aqueous extracts <strong>of</strong> Mimosa pudica leaves on mean volume <strong>of</strong> intestinal fluid (ml) and their %<br />

protection in prostaglandin-E 2 induced diarrhoea in rats<br />

Groups Treatment Dose Mean volume <strong>of</strong> intestinal % <strong>of</strong><br />

fluid (ml) � SEM inhibition<br />

I. Vehicle 1 ml <strong>of</strong> 5% v/v ethanol and 1.567 ± 0.08819 —<br />

control normal saline p.o.<br />

II. PGE control PGE 100 � g/kg 3.367 ± 0.09189 —<br />

2<br />

2<br />

III. Standard 5 mg/kg 1.690 ± 0.03890 *** 79.21%<br />

IV. AEMP 200mg/kg 2.467 ± 0.1256* 40.01%<br />

V. AEMP 400mg/kg 2.155 ± 0.07482** 52.65%<br />

AEMP: Aqueous Extract <strong>of</strong> Mimosa pudica, The values are Mean SEM, n = 6, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs control<br />

Fig. 2: Effect <strong>of</strong> aqueous extracts <strong>of</strong> Mimosa pudica leaves on mean volume <strong>of</strong> intestinal fluid in prostaglandin-E 2<br />

induced enteropooling model<br />

3. Gastro-intestinal motility Test:<br />

Md. Saifuddin Khalid et al./ Antidiarrhoeal Activity <strong>of</strong> Aqueous Extract <strong>of</strong> Mimosa Pudica Leaves<br />

A: Vehical Control<br />

B: PGE Control<br />

2<br />

C: Standard (Loperamide 5 mg/kg p. o.)<br />

D: Aqueous extract <strong>of</strong> Mimosa pudica leaves (200 mg/kg p. o.)<br />

E: Aqueous extract <strong>of</strong> Mimosa pudica leaves (400 mg/kg p. o.)<br />

Table: 3 Effect <strong>of</strong> aqueous extracts <strong>of</strong> Mimosa pudica leaves on mean movement <strong>of</strong> charcoal and their %<br />

inhibition in gastro-intestinal motility test in rats<br />

Group Treatment Dose Mean length Mean distance Mean% movement <strong>of</strong> % <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> intestine travelled by charcoal charcoal±SEM inhibition<br />

±SEM (cm) meal±SEM (cm) (cm)<br />

I. control --- 106±0.7303 82.33±1.764 75.69 ± 0.4357 ----<br />

II. Standard 5 102.7±1.02*** 53.33±0.8819*** 50.79 ± 0.8274*** 50%<br />

(Atropine Sulphate)<br />

III. AEMP 200 105±0.8944* 74.17±1.400* 67.46 ± 0.1014* 32.07%<br />

IV. AEMP 400 103.8±1.014* 63.50±0.7638** 65.13 ± 0.1841* 34.65%<br />

AEMP: Aqueous Extract <strong>of</strong> Mimosa pudica, The values are Mean SEM, n = 6, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs control<br />

Fig 3: Effect <strong>of</strong> aqueous extracts <strong>of</strong> Mimosa pudica leaves on mean % movement <strong>of</strong> charcoal meal in<br />

gastro-intestinal motility test<br />

A: Control<br />

B: Standard (Atropine sulphate 5 mg/kg p. o.)<br />

C: Aqueous extract <strong>of</strong> Mimosa pudica leaves (200 mg/kg p. o.)<br />

D: Aqueous extract <strong>of</strong> Mimosa pudica leaves (400 mg/kg p. o.)<br />

139<br />

RJPS, Jul - Sep, 2011/ Vol 1/ Issue 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!