31.10.2012 Views

Chitosan Loaded Mucoadhesive Microspheres of Gliclazide - Journal

Chitosan Loaded Mucoadhesive Microspheres of Gliclazide - Journal

Chitosan Loaded Mucoadhesive Microspheres of Gliclazide - Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prakash Rao B et al./ Formulation and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mucoadhesive</strong> Buccal Drug Delivery System <strong>of</strong> Metoprolol Tartrate by Using Central Composite Design<br />

Table 8: FT-IR spectrum <strong>of</strong> MT alone and excipients<br />

Interpretation IR absorption IR absorption band <strong>of</strong> metoprolol<br />

band <strong>of</strong> Pure<br />

Metoprolol Drug + Drug + HPC<br />

Tartrate(cm -1 )<br />

-1<br />

Carbopol (cm )<br />

-1<br />

(cm )<br />

-NH 2 ,-OH,aliphatic 3610.79 – 2360.95 3608.93 – 2359.89 3611.83 – 2356.13<br />

and aromatic CH<br />

Carboxylic acid salt 1573.97 1580.14 1580.57<br />

Aromatic ring 1514.17 1515.14 1513.21<br />

Isopropyl group 1179.51 1180.47 1174.69<br />

Aliphatic ether, 1112.00 1112.00 1112.00 1,4<br />

secondary alcohol<br />

di-substituted Benzene 824.24 826.53 824.60<br />

Table 9: Result <strong>of</strong> stability studies according to ICH guidelines<br />

Parameter 0 Days 6 months<br />

Physical apperence White White<br />

Drug content 49.06 49.05<br />

Bioadhesive strength 43.52 43.12<br />

physical changes <strong>of</strong> the substance are recorded as a function<br />

<strong>of</strong> temperature or time as substance is heated at a liner rate.<br />

The DTA <strong>of</strong> the pure drug shows two endothermic peaks(Fig<br />

0<br />

11). The peak at 123.19 C indicates its melting point and the<br />

0<br />

other peak at 223.12 C may be the degredation peak. In the<br />

DTA studies there was no shift in the melting peak. So, the<br />

selected excipients for the formulation were found to be<br />

compatible with the active ingredients and having no physical<br />

interaction with the active pharmaceutical ingredient.<br />

Stabality Studies<br />

The optimized formula was evaluated for physical<br />

appearance, drug content and bioadhesive strength for every<br />

month. The values given were at end <strong>of</strong> the six months. It<br />

was found that optimized formula was stable.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The CCD was used to find out the effect <strong>of</strong> independent<br />

varibles on the dependable variables. The result <strong>of</strong> CCD<br />

revealed that the carbopol 934P and HPC have significant<br />

effect on the drug release at 8 hour, bioadhesive strength,<br />

T50% and release exponent(n). The observed independent<br />

variables were found to be very close to predicted values <strong>of</strong><br />

optimized formulation which demonstrates the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

the optimization procedure in successful development <strong>of</strong><br />

buccal tablets containing MT by using carbopol 934P and<br />

HPC.<br />

155<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Shojaei AH. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: A<br />

review. J Pharm Sci 1998;1:15-30.<br />

2. Patel VM, Prajapati BG, Patel MM. Formulation, evaluation and<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> bilayer and multilayered mucoadhesive buccal device<br />

<strong>of</strong> Propranolol hydrochloride. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2006;8:1-15.<br />

3. Giunchedi P, Juliano C, Gavini E. Formulation and In-vivo evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Chlorhexidine buccal tablets prepared using a drug loaded<br />

chitosan microspheres. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2002; 53: 233-9.<br />

4. Perioli L, Ambrogi V, Giovagnoli S, Ricci M, Blasi P, Rossi C.<br />

<strong>Mucoadhesive</strong> bilayered tablets for buccal sustained release<br />

Flurbipr<strong>of</strong>en. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2007; 8:1-9.<br />

5. Desai KGH, Pramod kumar TM. Preparation and evaluation <strong>of</strong> a novel<br />

buccal adhesive system. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2004; 5:1-9.<br />

6. Munasur AP, Pillay V, Chetty DJ, Govender T. Statistical optimization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mucoadhesivity and characterisation <strong>of</strong> multipolymeric<br />

Propranolol matrices for buccal therapy. Int J Pharm 2006; 323:43-51.<br />

7. Yong CS, Jung JH, Rhee JP, Kim CK, Choi HG. Physicochemical<br />

characterization and evaluation <strong>of</strong> buccal adhesive tablets containing<br />

Omeprazole. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2001;27: 447-55.<br />

8. Yan MO, Choi HG, Jung JK, Kim CK. Development <strong>of</strong><br />

thermoreversible Insulin liquide suppository with sodium salicylate.<br />

Int J Pharm 1999; 189:137-45.<br />

9. Yamsani VV, Gannu R, Kolli C, Rao ME, Yamsani MR. Development<br />

and In-vitro evaluation <strong>of</strong> buccoadhesive Carvedilol tablets. Acta<br />

Pharm 2007;57:185-97.<br />

10. Khanna R, Agrawal SP, Ahuja A. Preparation and evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

bioerodible buccal tablets containing Clotrimazole. Int J Pharm 1996;<br />

138:67-73.<br />

11. Owens TS, Dansereau RJ, Sakr A. Development and evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

extended release bioadhesive Sodium fluoride tablets. Int J Pharm<br />

2005;288:109-22.<br />

12.<br />

th<br />

Tripathi KD. Essentials <strong>of</strong> medical pharmacology. 5 ed. New Delhi:<br />

Jaypee publishers. 2003;12913. Singh B, Chakkal SK,<br />

Ahuja N. Formulation and optimization <strong>of</strong> controlled release<br />

RJPS, Jul - Sep, 2011/ Vol 1/ Issue 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!