05.06.2014 Views

Prevention Guide - Safe Handling of Hazardous Drugs - Irsst

Prevention Guide - Safe Handling of Hazardous Drugs - Irsst

Prevention Guide - Safe Handling of Hazardous Drugs - Irsst

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15. MEDICAL, BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING<br />

A wide variety <strong>of</strong> hazardous drugs is handled in every pharmacy department, as well as in the care units<br />

and outpatient clinics. In the medium term, the assessment <strong>of</strong> worker exposure could be performed by<br />

identifying one or more <strong>of</strong> the most frequently used drugs and periodically measuring their concentrations<br />

in the blood or urine. Currently, however, there are no reference values in this regard. In addition, the<br />

finding <strong>of</strong> minute traces (in nanograms or picograms) must be interpreted with a great deal <strong>of</strong> caution.<br />

In theory, this type <strong>of</strong> monitoring could probably provide a more accurate picture <strong>of</strong> actual occupational<br />

exposure than environmental monitoring and confirm the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the corrective action being<br />

taken in the workplace. The results would take into account the actual effectiveness <strong>of</strong> both the protective<br />

measures for each worker and the work techniques. However, a biological monitoring protocol has yet to<br />

be validated and this type <strong>of</strong> monitoring may present drawbacks for the workers which are not yet welldocumented.<br />

In particular, relatively little is known about the relationship between the level and duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> worker exposure and the likelihood <strong>of</strong> developing a health problem (Fransman, 2007). In addition,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten not enough is known regarding how low doses <strong>of</strong> these drugs are metabolized in the body<br />

(Dranitsaris, 2005). The interpretation <strong>of</strong> the results in a group <strong>of</strong> workers may help circumvent the risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> adverse effects likely to result from analysis <strong>of</strong> a single individual and would, in all likelihood, be more<br />

reliable. Despite this, we are currently not recommending introducing this type <strong>of</strong> monitoring and these<br />

tests should only be used in a research setting.<br />

Precautionary reassignment <strong>of</strong> pregnant or nursing workers<br />

While improving preventive measures reduces exposure, the very importance <strong>of</strong> these measures and the<br />

necessity for periodic monitoring via environmental measurements and evaluation <strong>of</strong> work techniques<br />

confirm the existence <strong>of</strong> risk. Reducing contamination depends on many factors (facilities, the use <strong>of</strong><br />

good techniques by the worker and her colleagues, protective equipment, thorough cleaning, etc.) and<br />

failures or disruptions can occur. Pregnant workers are entitled to be assigned to avoid any exposure –<br />

even accidental.<br />

Precautionary reassignment prior to conception<br />

Despite several requests in this regard, the working group is not issuing any formal recommendations in<br />

this guide regarding the reassignment <strong>of</strong> workers who are planning a pregnancy. In our opinion, such a<br />

measure will become less relevant as exposure control improves.<br />

Exclusion <strong>of</strong> workers who have been treated for cancer<br />

While it is true that the drugs used to treat a cancer can increase the risk <strong>of</strong> developing a new cancer, the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> occupational exposure is so marginal in comparison to the doses used during treatment that we do<br />

not feel it warranted to prohibit these individuals from resuming their work. However, the clinician<br />

should have the final word in this regard.<br />

Environmental monitoring<br />

Environmental monitoring allows the evaluation and measurement <strong>of</strong> chemical contamination by<br />

hazardous drugs. In view <strong>of</strong> the seriousness <strong>of</strong> the potential effects, the Act respecting Occupational<br />

Health and <strong>Safe</strong>ty and caution itself suggest reducing exposure as low as reasonably achievable<br />

(ALARA) (Turci, 2006). While an acceptable level has yet to be determined by occupational health and<br />

safety organizations, a scientific review <strong>of</strong> the publications in this regard should be carried out. For<br />

example, the August 15, 2006 update proposed by the United States Pharmacopoeia discusses a<br />

maximum acceptable threshold for cyclophosphamide <strong>of</strong> 1 ng/cm 2 (USP, 2006).<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> organizations recommend keeping a record <strong>of</strong> environmental measurements. The ASSTSAS<br />

<strong>Hazardous</strong> Drug Committee supports this recommendation. To this end, the Committee has requested the<br />

help <strong>of</strong> the INSPQ Toxicology Laboratory in developing a technique for detecting and measuring traces<br />

<strong>of</strong> antineoplastic agents using samples taken from work surfaces. Tests have been developed to measure<br />

three agents. They are available from the INSPQ and are based on the procedures described in Appendix<br />

5.<br />

15-2 ASSTSAS PREVENTION GUIDE – SAFE HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS DRUGS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!