24.07.2014 Views

CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network

CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network

CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DOCUMENT BACKGROUND / CURRENT STATUS EFFECT OF DOCUMENT SSN VIEW<br />

62<br />

Continued<br />

Continued<br />

38. Purpose codes on <strong>CITES</strong><br />

permits and certificates<br />

Cop16 Doc. 38<br />

• RC 12.3 (Rev. CoP15) on Permits and certificates,<br />

inter alia, provides a list of the purpose-of-transaction<br />

codes.<br />

• Decision 14.54 (Rev. CoP15) directs an SC WG on<br />

purpose-of-transaction codes to define purpose-oftransaction<br />

codes to encourage their consistent use;<br />

to consider the possible elimination of current codes<br />

or the inclusion of new ones; and to report to <strong>CoP16</strong>.<br />

• ensure that African and Asian elephant range<br />

States are included in the process and that all<br />

future work relating to implementation of this<br />

Decision is conducted in both French and English.<br />

• Prepared by the Chair of the SC WG on purpose-oftransaction<br />

codes.<br />

• Provides amendments to RC 12.3 (Rev. CoP15)<br />

(Annex) that include:<br />

• definitions of purpose codes;<br />

• changes to the purpose codes including:<br />

··<br />

deletion of codes G (botanical garden), M<br />

(medical, including biomedical research), E<br />

(educational), and Z (zoo);<br />

··<br />

expansion of code N to include the deleted<br />

codes (G, M, E, Z) for non-commercial purposes;<br />

and<br />

··<br />

expansion of code T to include the deleted<br />

codes (G, M, E, Z) for commercial purposes;<br />

and<br />

• statement that purpose codes on the export and<br />

import documents do not need to match for the<br />

transaction to occur; the purpose code on the<br />

export permit does not necessarily reflect the purpose<br />

of import.<br />

mechanism will complement and support the AEAP and<br />

its implementation (of critical importance as AEAP is a<br />

consensus document adopted by all 37 African elephant<br />

range States).<br />

• Consultation processes thus far with regard to Decision<br />

14.77 have been inadequate, partly due to lack of translation<br />

into French. Proposed revision will ensure such<br />

problems cannot recur by requiring that any consultation<br />

process has adequate confirmed funds for full translation<br />

before work can be initiated.<br />

OPPOSE<br />

• The proposed changes to purpose codes would eliminate<br />

important details regarding the nature of transactions. For<br />

example, under the new codes, trade for zoos would be<br />

under codes T or N but neither code would distinguish<br />

trade for zoos from a number of other types of transactions<br />

(e.g. educational, re-introduction). This could have<br />

negative implications for analysis of trade data and understanding<br />

trade levels and patterns.<br />

• RC 12.3 (Rev. CoP15) states that the codes are to be<br />

used to state “the purpose of the transaction” (emphasis<br />

added); this means that the purpose code on import and<br />

export should be the same for a single transaction; however,<br />

the proposed amendment states that the codes do<br />

not need to be the same.<br />

• SSN strongly urges the Parties to SC to direct the WG to<br />

provide supporting arguments for any proposed changes<br />

to the purpose code definitions: none have been provided,<br />

nor are problems associated with the use of the current<br />

codes identified.<br />

39. Transport of live<br />

specimens<br />

Cop16 Doc. 39<br />

• Decision 15.59 directs AC and PC to, inter alia:<br />

• proceed with replacing the <strong>CITES</strong> Guidelines for<br />

transport and preparation for shipment of wild<br />

live animals and plants (1981) with new guidelines<br />

for consideration at <strong>CoP16</strong>;<br />

• review and propose revisions to RC 10.21 (Rev.<br />

CoP14) on Transport of live specimens and RC<br />

12.3 (Rev. CoP14) on Permits and certificates, for<br />

consideration at <strong>CoP16</strong>; and<br />

• report at <strong>CoP16</strong>.<br />

• Prepared by Co-chairs of joint AC/PC transport WG<br />

and Secretariat.<br />

• Proposes amendments to RC.10 21 (Rev. CoP14)<br />

(Annex 1) that include, inter alia:<br />

• examining, when appropriate, any regularly high<br />

mortality shipments of live specimens and making<br />

recommendations to relevant Parties, exporters,<br />

importers and transport companies on how to<br />

avoid this in the future;<br />

SUPPORT IN PART / OPPOSE IN PART<br />

• Regarding proposed amendments to RC 10.21 (Rev.<br />

CoP14), SSN urges Parties to:<br />

• reject the addition of “when appropriate” in para d)<br />

as all “regularly” high mortality shipments should be<br />

examined;<br />

• support incorporation of <strong>CITES</strong> Guidelines; and<br />

• reject deletion of introductory text because these<br />

statements remain valid.<br />

Continued Continued Continued

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!