CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network
CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network
CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
DOCUMENT BACKGROUND / CURRENT STATUS EFFECT OF DOCUMENT SSN VIEW<br />
62<br />
Continued<br />
Continued<br />
38. Purpose codes on <strong>CITES</strong><br />
permits and certificates<br />
Cop16 Doc. 38<br />
• RC 12.3 (Rev. CoP15) on Permits and certificates,<br />
inter alia, provides a list of the purpose-of-transaction<br />
codes.<br />
• Decision 14.54 (Rev. CoP15) directs an SC WG on<br />
purpose-of-transaction codes to define purpose-oftransaction<br />
codes to encourage their consistent use;<br />
to consider the possible elimination of current codes<br />
or the inclusion of new ones; and to report to <strong>CoP16</strong>.<br />
• ensure that African and Asian elephant range<br />
States are included in the process and that all<br />
future work relating to implementation of this<br />
Decision is conducted in both French and English.<br />
• Prepared by the Chair of the SC WG on purpose-oftransaction<br />
codes.<br />
• Provides amendments to RC 12.3 (Rev. CoP15)<br />
(Annex) that include:<br />
• definitions of purpose codes;<br />
• changes to the purpose codes including:<br />
··<br />
deletion of codes G (botanical garden), M<br />
(medical, including biomedical research), E<br />
(educational), and Z (zoo);<br />
··<br />
expansion of code N to include the deleted<br />
codes (G, M, E, Z) for non-commercial purposes;<br />
and<br />
··<br />
expansion of code T to include the deleted<br />
codes (G, M, E, Z) for commercial purposes;<br />
and<br />
• statement that purpose codes on the export and<br />
import documents do not need to match for the<br />
transaction to occur; the purpose code on the<br />
export permit does not necessarily reflect the purpose<br />
of import.<br />
mechanism will complement and support the AEAP and<br />
its implementation (of critical importance as AEAP is a<br />
consensus document adopted by all 37 African elephant<br />
range States).<br />
• Consultation processes thus far with regard to Decision<br />
14.77 have been inadequate, partly due to lack of translation<br />
into French. Proposed revision will ensure such<br />
problems cannot recur by requiring that any consultation<br />
process has adequate confirmed funds for full translation<br />
before work can be initiated.<br />
OPPOSE<br />
• The proposed changes to purpose codes would eliminate<br />
important details regarding the nature of transactions. For<br />
example, under the new codes, trade for zoos would be<br />
under codes T or N but neither code would distinguish<br />
trade for zoos from a number of other types of transactions<br />
(e.g. educational, re-introduction). This could have<br />
negative implications for analysis of trade data and understanding<br />
trade levels and patterns.<br />
• RC 12.3 (Rev. CoP15) states that the codes are to be<br />
used to state “the purpose of the transaction” (emphasis<br />
added); this means that the purpose code on import and<br />
export should be the same for a single transaction; however,<br />
the proposed amendment states that the codes do<br />
not need to be the same.<br />
• SSN strongly urges the Parties to SC to direct the WG to<br />
provide supporting arguments for any proposed changes<br />
to the purpose code definitions: none have been provided,<br />
nor are problems associated with the use of the current<br />
codes identified.<br />
39. Transport of live<br />
specimens<br />
Cop16 Doc. 39<br />
• Decision 15.59 directs AC and PC to, inter alia:<br />
• proceed with replacing the <strong>CITES</strong> Guidelines for<br />
transport and preparation for shipment of wild<br />
live animals and plants (1981) with new guidelines<br />
for consideration at <strong>CoP16</strong>;<br />
• review and propose revisions to RC 10.21 (Rev.<br />
CoP14) on Transport of live specimens and RC<br />
12.3 (Rev. CoP14) on Permits and certificates, for<br />
consideration at <strong>CoP16</strong>; and<br />
• report at <strong>CoP16</strong>.<br />
• Prepared by Co-chairs of joint AC/PC transport WG<br />
and Secretariat.<br />
• Proposes amendments to RC.10 21 (Rev. CoP14)<br />
(Annex 1) that include, inter alia:<br />
• examining, when appropriate, any regularly high<br />
mortality shipments of live specimens and making<br />
recommendations to relevant Parties, exporters,<br />
importers and transport companies on how to<br />
avoid this in the future;<br />
SUPPORT IN PART / OPPOSE IN PART<br />
• Regarding proposed amendments to RC 10.21 (Rev.<br />
CoP14), SSN urges Parties to:<br />
• reject the addition of “when appropriate” in para d)<br />
as all “regularly” high mortality shipments should be<br />
examined;<br />
• support incorporation of <strong>CITES</strong> Guidelines; and<br />
• reject deletion of introductory text because these<br />
statements remain valid.<br />
Continued Continued Continued