CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network
CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network
CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SPECIES/PROPONENT/PROPOSAL CURRENT STATUS OF SPECIES SSN VIEW<br />
Prop. 9<br />
Lesser bilby<br />
Macrotis leucura<br />
• Distribution: Australia.<br />
• Population: Extinct (IUCN 2008); not seen in wild since 1931.<br />
• Threats: Predation and habitat alteration.<br />
• Trade: None except for a few museum specimens.<br />
SUPPORT<br />
• Listed in in 1975 when already thought to be extinct.<br />
• Trade would be regulated under Australian law if rediscovered.<br />
• AC26 supports deletion (AC26 WG1 Doc. 2).<br />
Australia<br />
Deletion from Appendix I<br />
Prop. 10<br />
Southern white rhino<br />
Ceratotherium simum simum<br />
Kenya<br />
To amend the annotation for Ceratotherium simum<br />
simum as follows: “Ceratotherium simum simum<br />
(Only the populations of South Africa and Swaziland;<br />
all other populations are included in Appendix I.<br />
For the exclusive purpose of allowing international<br />
trade in live animals to appropriate and acceptable<br />
destinations and hunting trophies. Hunting<br />
trophies from South Africa and Swaziland shall be<br />
subject to a zero export quota until at least CoP18.<br />
All other specimens shall be deemed to be specimens<br />
of species included in Appendix I and the<br />
trade in them shall be regulated accordingly)”<br />
• Distribution: South Africa; smaller reintroduced populations in Namibia,<br />
Botswana, Zimbabwe, Swaziland; small number may survive in Mozambique;<br />
introduced outside of known former range to Kenya, Uganda, Zambia.<br />
• Population: Ceratotherium simum: Near Threatened (IUCN 2012); wild<br />
population estimated to be 20,170 as of 31 Dec 2010 (IUCN).<br />
• Threats: Illegal hunting (poaching), compounded by misuse of legal trophy<br />
hunting in South Africa to export horns which are then illegally used for commercial<br />
purposes in importing States.<br />
• Trade: Between 1995 and 2011, 795 horns and 1,716 rhino hunting trophies<br />
were exported from South Africa (<strong>CITES</strong> Trade Database); importing<br />
countries reported importing 795 horns and 1,564 trophies from South Africa<br />
during same period; of these, 177 horns and 241 trophies were imported by<br />
Vietnam (2011 data appear incomplete and figures should be regarded as<br />
minimums).<br />
www.ssn.org<br />
SUPPORT, noting that the time frame for the proposed<br />
zero quota needs clarification<br />
• Current annotation provides a loophole through which horns from<br />
legally-hunted rhinos have been exported to Vietnam and elsewhere<br />
and allegedly used for commercial purposes (CoP15 Doc. 45.1 (Rev. 1)<br />
Annex); proposed amendment closes this loophole temporarily.<br />
• According to <strong>CoP16</strong> Doc. 54.1 "Vietnam does acknowledge that whilst it<br />
has comprehensive legislation and penalties this is not enough to stop<br />
the determined trafficker… hunting trophies can present problems most<br />
noticeably once they have been imported and they suggest that the<br />
working group (or CoP) should consider and provide guidance on how to<br />
control and monitor rhino horn hunting trophies after their import".<br />
• The proponent states its intention is only to suspend export of trophies<br />
for a given period; proposed timeline would allow exporting and importing<br />
Parties to ensure that their laws, regulations, enforcement and other<br />
mechanisms can control illegal use of trophy horns after import.<br />
• Although South Africa has closed down some routes whereby rhino horn<br />
trophies have entered the illegal market and a number of foreigners<br />
(e.g. from Mozambique, Vietnam and Thailand) have been given heavy<br />
sentences, potential for abuse of the existing annotation still exists.<br />
Residents of EU Member States have been implicated in so-called<br />
pseudo-hunts (<strong>CoP16</strong> Doc. 54.2).<br />
5