CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network
CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network
CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
DOCUMENT BACKGROUND / CURRENT STATUS EFFECT OF DOCUMENT SSN VIEW<br />
74<br />
Continued<br />
Continued<br />
• Over the last three years, in terms of frequency<br />
and scale, the Chinese market has been more<br />
heavily implicated in illicit trade in ivory than any<br />
other country; “the Chinese market for illicit ivory<br />
continues to grow without respite”; “since CoP15,<br />
China has reportedly experienced a serious lapse<br />
in the regulation of its legal ivory market exacerbating<br />
the presence of ivory products of illicit origin<br />
in the Chinese market”.<br />
• Nearly three-quarters of the trade since 2006 is<br />
represented by large-scale seizures, which indicates<br />
the strong presence of organized criminal<br />
activity behind the ivory trade.<br />
• There is a correlation between the 2008 ivory sale<br />
and the subsequent illicit ivory trade but that trade<br />
patterns in China and Japan strongly suggest that<br />
other factors either exacerbate or mitigate ivory<br />
consumption beyond the impact of <strong>CITES</strong> events.<br />
• Compliance with the requirements for internal<br />
trade (RC 10.10 (Rev. CoP14)) and the Action plan<br />
for the control of trade in African elephant ivory<br />
(Decision 13.26 (Rev. CoP15)) are “failing to produce<br />
positive results”.<br />
• Thailand’s legal allowance of trade in ivory tusks from<br />
domesticated Asian elephants is exploited to market<br />
African elephant ivory; and<br />
• law enforcement at the retail market level rarely, if<br />
ever, occurs.<br />
• SSN urges Parties to acknowledge that the 2008 approval of<br />
China and Japan as ivory trading partners has lapsed, and<br />
that no sales to these countries should be permitted from<br />
any Party without complete re-evaluation of their status.<br />
• SSN recommends that Parties adopt a Decision directing<br />
the SC to consider, at its next regular meeting, the adoption<br />
of trade suspensions for China and Thailand, with<br />
immediate effect, if these countries have failed to submit<br />
a report demonstrating their compliance with the requirements<br />
of RC10.10 (Rev. CoP15) by that date.<br />
• SSN further urges the CoP to direct the SC to consider<br />
what measures could be taken to assist in improving<br />
enforcement and detection in transit countries where no<br />
legal ivory markets exist.<br />
53.3 Proposed new<br />
resolution concerning the<br />
African Elephant Action<br />
Plan and African Elephant<br />
Fund<br />
Cop16 Doc. 53.3<br />
• Decisions 14.76 and 14.79 direct African Elephant<br />
range States to establish an African Elephant Action<br />
Plan (AEAP) and African Elephant Fund (AEF).<br />
• AEAP was developed and approved by consensus of<br />
all 37 African elephant range States at CoP15.<br />
• AEF is a UNEP trust fund; AEF Programme Support<br />
Costs are equal to 7% of expenditures incurred.<br />
• AEF Steering Committee (AEFSC) identified need<br />
for secretarial and translation support for AEFSC; to<br />
date, support from UNEP not received.<br />
• Prepared by Nigeria and Rwanda.<br />
• Provides:<br />
• draft Resolution urging donors to provide necessary<br />
funding for implementation of AEAP and<br />
directing Secretariat to integrate funding for<br />
implementation of AEAP into its fundraising strategy;<br />
and<br />
• draft Decision directing SC to request UNEP to<br />
provide necessary secretarial and translation support<br />
to AEFSC.<br />
SUPPORT<br />
• AEAP is of critical importance given the current African<br />
elephant poaching crisis.<br />
• It is essential that AEF receive funds needed to ensure<br />
implementation of AEAP.<br />
• Draft Resolution will help to ensure that AEAP and AEF<br />
remain central to <strong>CITES</strong>’ agenda and long-term priorities,<br />
and that AEF is able to receive funding from external<br />
donors with assistance from Secretariat.<br />
• The proposed new Decision is also essential to ensure the<br />
effective functioning of the AEFSC.<br />
54. Rhinoceroses<br />
54.1 Report of the<br />
Working Group<br />
Cop16 Doc. 54.1<br />
• Decisions 15.71-15.73 direct:<br />
• Secretariat to examine implementation of RC<br />
9.14 (Rev. CoP15) on Conservation of and trade<br />
in African and Asian rhinoceros in certain range<br />
States; examine progress on curtailing illegal<br />
Continued<br />
• Prepared by Chair of SC WG on Rhinoceroses.<br />
• Reports on additional measures introduced in South<br />
Africa to regulate rhino hunting.<br />
• Recommends, inter alia, that:<br />
Continued<br />
SUPPORT<br />
• SSN urges SC WG on Rhinoceroses to meet early during<br />
<strong>CoP16</strong> to develop, from its recommendations, draft<br />
Decisions for adoption at <strong>CoP16</strong>. SSN recommends these<br />
include, inter alia, Decisions urging Parties to:<br />
Continued