24.07.2014 Views

CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network

CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network

CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DOCUMENT BACKGROUND / CURRENT STATUS EFFECT OF DOCUMENT SSN VIEW<br />

Continued<br />

Continued<br />

Continued<br />

plantations should be considered as being artificially<br />

propagated in accordance with the definition in RC<br />

11.11 (Rev. CoP15).<br />

• Decision 15.94 directs PC to consider current definitions<br />

of artificially propagated plants and how they<br />

apply to trees in mixed species plantations and report<br />

at <strong>CoP16</strong>.<br />

• Decision 15.95 directs Secretariat to organize a workshop<br />

to discuss management of wild and plantationsource<br />

agarwood.<br />

of trees grown in monospecific or mixed plantations<br />

be considered as being artificially propagated<br />

in accordance with the definition contained in RC<br />

11.11 (Rev. CoP15)”.<br />

• Provides a draft Decision directing PC to consider<br />

current production systems of tree species, including<br />

mixed and monospecific plantations, and assess applicability<br />

of current definitions of artificial propagation in<br />

RC 10.13 and RC 11.11 and report to CoP17.<br />

• Recommends that Decision 15.95 be revised and<br />

extended.<br />

• SSN recommends that Parties agree to extend Decision<br />

15.95.<br />

67.2 Draft resolution on<br />

Implementation of<br />

the Convention for<br />

agarwood-producing<br />

taxa<br />

Cop16 Doc. 67.2<br />

• RC 11.11 (Rev. CoP15) on Regulation of trade in<br />

plants, inter alia, provides definitions of ‘‘under controlled<br />

conditions” and “artificially propagated”.<br />

• At CoP15, several decisions regarding agarwood were<br />

adopted; these, inter alia, direct:<br />

• PC to consider current definitions of artificially<br />

propagated plants and how they apply to trees<br />

in mixed species plantations and report at <strong>CoP16</strong><br />

(Decision 15.94); and<br />

• Secretariat to organize a workshop to discuss<br />

management of wild and plantation source agarwood<br />

(Decision 15.95).<br />

• Parties attending workshops in Kuwait (October 2011)<br />

and Indonesia (November 2011) concluded that: current<br />

definition of artificially propagated does not apply<br />

to mixed species plantations; definition of “under<br />

controlled conditions” should be amended to explicitly<br />

encompass conditions found in tree plantations for<br />

the purpose of plant production including their parts<br />

and derivatives.<br />

• Prepared by China, Indonesia, Kuwait, Thailand.<br />

• Provides a draft Resolution on agarwood that, inter alia,<br />

• establishes a definition of ‘‘under controlled conditions’<br />

and ‘artificially propagated’ for agarwood- producing<br />

taxa, that differs from that for all other taxa.<br />

• reduce the requirement that the environment be<br />

“intensively manipulated” to merely “manipulated”;<br />

• allow specimens sourced from wild seedling, saplings,<br />

cuttings, etc. to be considered “artificially<br />

propagated”; and<br />

• expand definition of artificially propagated agarwood<br />

producing plants to include those in gardens,<br />

state, private or community production plantations,<br />

either monospecific or mixed species.<br />

• encourages Parties to establish a registration system<br />

for artificially propagated trees, and a registration<br />

system for exporters of agarwood oil.<br />

OPPOSE<br />

• Draft Resolution would allow:<br />

• agarwood to be traded under less strict criteria with<br />

regards to “artificially propagated” and “under controlled<br />

conditions” than all other <strong>CITES</strong>-listed plant species;<br />

• the definition of ‘artificially propagated’ to be expanded<br />

for agarwood to include plantations with mixed species<br />

(see SSN View for <strong>CoP16</strong> Doc. 67.1); and<br />

• specimens sourced from wild seedlings, saplings, cuttings,<br />

etc. to be considered “artificially propagated”.<br />

• Current definitions in RC 11.11 (Rev. CoP15) are being<br />

successfully applied to other <strong>CITES</strong>-listed species.<br />

• Proposed definitions would weaken controls adopted to protect<br />

vulnerable species such as those producing agarwood.<br />

• At PC20 participants expressed concern that: “…defining<br />

specimens of artificially propagated agarwood-producing<br />

species too broadly would mean that controls would be<br />

reduced on many specimens exported and that, if the<br />

amended definition were applied to other plant species,<br />

there may be unforeseen consequences”.<br />

• SSN urges Parties to establish a transparent, international<br />

registration system for agarwood plantations and for<br />

exporters of agarwood oil.<br />

• SSN also urges the Parties to ensure that any Resolution<br />

on agarwood should also focus on strengthening Party<br />

capacities to formulate NDFs for agarwood producing<br />

species.<br />

www.ssn.org<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!