24.07.2014 Views

CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network

CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network

CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DOCUMENT BACKGROUND / CURRENT STATUS EFFECT OF DOCUMENT SSN VIEW<br />

68<br />

47. Proposed revision of<br />

Resolution Conf. 13.7<br />

(Rev. CoP14) on Control<br />

of trade in personal and<br />

household effects<br />

Cop16 Doc. 47<br />

• Decision 14.138 (Rev. CoP15) directs Parties concerned<br />

to agree on which agarwood products and<br />

quantities should be exempted from <strong>CITES</strong> controls,<br />

for submission to <strong>CoP16</strong>.<br />

• Prepared by Indonesia and Kuwait.<br />

• Proposes including in the list of quantitative exemptions<br />

contained in paragraph b) ii) of RC 13.7 (Rev.<br />

CoP14) on Control of trade in personal and household<br />

effects, “Specimens of agarwood – up to 1 kg woodchips,<br />

60 ml oil, and 2 pieces of beads, (or prayer<br />

beads, necklaces, bracelets) per person”.<br />

OPPOSE<br />

• Only three range States (Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New<br />

Guinea) are currently exporting agarwood from the wild.<br />

Most range states have forbidden harvest from the wild to<br />

protect remaining trees.<br />

• Allowing exemptions for wild products of agarwood could<br />

undermine protection measures for wild populations.<br />

• If exemptions are adopted they should only be for products<br />

coming from artificially propagated specimens.<br />

48. Implementation of the<br />

Convention relating<br />

to captive-bred and<br />

ranched specimens<br />

Cop16 Doc. 48<br />

• Decisions 15.52 and 15.53 direct Secretariat to<br />

contract an appropriate expert to prepare a guide to<br />

advise Parties on appropriate use of source codes,<br />

and AC and PC to provide feedback to Secretariat on<br />

the guide.<br />

• SC62 developed and agreed to the draft Decisions in<br />

this document.<br />

• Submitted by SC.<br />

• Requests <strong>CoP16</strong> to agree that Decisions 15.52 and<br />

15.53 remain in effect following <strong>CoP16</strong>.<br />

• Proposes additional draft Decisions that, inter alia:<br />

• direct Secretariat to contract an expert to: identify<br />

problems associated with use of source codes C,<br />

D, F and R; develop draft checklists or guides for<br />

inspection of breeding and ranching facilities, and<br />

review of permit applications for captive-bred<br />

and ranched specimens;<br />

• direct AC to review the consultant’s report and<br />

provide recommendations to SC;<br />

• direct SC to review the report and recommendations<br />

of AC, make its own recommendations,<br />

consider proposing amendments to RC 12.8 (Rev.<br />

CoP13) on Review of Significant Trade in specimens<br />

of Appendix-II species or RC 14.3 on <strong>CITES</strong> compliance<br />

procedures, or propose a new Resolution<br />

to provide a process for reviewing trade in claimed<br />

captive-bred or ranched specimens; and<br />

• direct Secretariat to report to SC65 and SC66 on<br />

significant cases for which there is serious doubt<br />

as to whether traded specimens are truly captivebred<br />

or ranched.<br />

SUPPORT<br />

• SSN urges Parties to support these Decisions which will<br />

address problems of trade in specimens under C, D, F and<br />

R codes when such specimens do not appear to meet<br />

requirements for use of these codes.<br />

• SSN urges Parties to consider this to be a matter of high<br />

priority and urgency, as it affects trade in thousands of<br />

specimens annually.<br />

• Greater attention to this issue will assist exporting Parties<br />

to meet <strong>CITES</strong> requirements.<br />

• SSN recommends that the Parties consider amending<br />

the proposed Decisions to have AC and PC review and<br />

make recommendations regarding the guides for ranching<br />

and breeding facility inspections and review of permit<br />

applications.<br />

49. Great apes<br />

Cop16 Doc. 49<br />

• RC 13.4 on Conservation of and trade in great apes<br />

directs SC to, inter alia, consider measures such as<br />

technical missions, organized in cooperation with<br />

GRASP [UN Great Apes <strong>Survival</strong> Partnership] and<br />

other appropriate partnerships; and to report at each<br />

CoP on implementation of this Resolution, with recommendations<br />

for further action.<br />

Continued<br />

• Serves as report of SC; reports, inter alia, that:<br />

• Secretariat participated in several Great Apes and<br />

Integrity (GAPIN) meetings and used these meetings<br />

to seek information from great ape range<br />

States where technical missions could not be led;<br />

• Secretariat led (or will have led by <strong>CoP16</strong>) technical<br />

missions to Uganda, Cameroon, Gabon;<br />

Continued<br />

SUPPORT IN PART / OPPOSE IN PART<br />

• SSN supports proposed amendments to RC 13.4 but recommends<br />

that Parties reject proposed deletion of reference<br />

in RC 13.4 to the work of <strong>CITES</strong> Bushmeat WG as it<br />

is of great importance to the conservation of great apes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!