CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network
CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network
CITES CoP16 Digest - Species Survival Network
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
DOCUMENT BACKGROUND / CURRENT STATUS EFFECT OF DOCUMENT SSN VIEW<br />
Continued<br />
Continued<br />
46. Personal and household<br />
effects<br />
Cop16 Doc. 46<br />
had not been received.<br />
• Decision15.58 directs Secretariat to: develop an<br />
internet portal on the <strong>CITES</strong> website to disseminate<br />
information related to e-commerce of <strong>CITES</strong>-listed<br />
species; encourage INTERPOL to establish a secure<br />
interactive website or electronic forum containing<br />
information and intelligence regarding Internetrelated<br />
wildlife crime.<br />
• RC 11.3 (Rev. CoP15) on Compliance and enforcement<br />
requests Parties to, inter alia, “submit information to<br />
the Secretariat on methodologies used by agencies<br />
[other than INTERPOL] that may assist in the evaluation<br />
of mechanisms to regulate legal commerce of<br />
<strong>CITES</strong>-listed species via the Internet.”<br />
• Decision 14.64 (Rev. CoP15) directs the SC WG on<br />
Personal and Household Effects to, inter alia:<br />
• clarify the relationship between 'tourist souvenirs',<br />
‘hunting trophies’ and 'personal and household<br />
effects';<br />
• clarify the interpretation of Article VII, para 3 (b), of<br />
the Convention;<br />
• assess whether there are specific species or types<br />
of personal or household effects which, in view<br />
of conservation concerns, would require different<br />
treatment under RC 13.7 (Rev. CoP14) on Control<br />
of trade in personal and household effects;<br />
• collate information about how each Party has<br />
implemented RC 13.7 (Rev. CoP14), particularly<br />
regarding requirements for export permits, and<br />
assess whether this indicates the need to amend<br />
the Resolution; and<br />
• report at each SC until <strong>CoP16</strong> and at <strong>CoP16</strong>.<br />
• the Secretariat has written to INTERPOL.<br />
• The Secretariat:<br />
• encourages Parties to submit requested information;<br />
and<br />
• considers Decision 15.58 implemented.<br />
• Prepared by the Chair of the SC WG on Personal and<br />
Household Effects.<br />
• Reports that the WG has not identified any specific<br />
species or types of personal and household effects<br />
requiring different treatment under RC 13.7 (Rev.<br />
CoP14) and efforts to obtain information from the<br />
Parties on implementation of RC 13.7 (Rev. CoP14)<br />
have been unsuccessful.<br />
• Provides ‘Guidelines for Interpretation of Personal and<br />
Household Effects’ for adoption as an Annex to RC<br />
13.7 (Rev. CoP14).<br />
www.ssn.org<br />
SUPPORT<br />
• SSN recommends that Parties support adoption of the<br />
Guidelines as they may help implementation of a very difficult<br />
exemption.<br />
• SSN recommends the following amendments to the<br />
Guidelines to improve clarity:<br />
• amend paras 2 and 3 to make clear that the<br />
exemption would NOT apply to a specimen being<br />
imported into the person’s State of usual residence:<br />
“2. Article VII, para 3 (a), excludes Appendix I specimens<br />
…acquired outside the person’s country of<br />
usual residence and are being imported to the person’s<br />
State of usual residence…..”<br />
“3. Article VII, para 3 (b), excludes Appendix II specimens<br />
…removal from the wild occurred, is being imported to<br />
the person’s State of usual residence, AND where that<br />
country ….”; and<br />
• amend para 15 to bring the legal status of the specimen<br />
considered for exemption in the exporting State<br />
closer into line with the Convention text:<br />
• “Tourist souvenirs … will be exempted as personal<br />
effects if both the country of import and export implements<br />
the personal and household effects exemption...”<br />
The reason for this suggested change is that not requiring<br />
an export permit for a specimen may not be the same<br />
thing as recognizing the personal effects exemption (i.e.<br />
the specimen could be considered as not requiring an<br />
export permit because it falls under another Article VII<br />
exemptions (for example pre-Convention specimens).<br />
67