25.07.2014 Views

pdf download - Software and Computer Technology - TU Delft

pdf download - Software and Computer Technology - TU Delft

pdf download - Software and Computer Technology - TU Delft

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Automated Fault Diagnosis<br />

3.1 Overview Techniques<br />

by a sequence of states [4]. The structure is what enables the system to generate the behavior [4].<br />

One of the ideas in system theory is that the structure is as important for implementing the function<br />

of a system as the individual behavior of components. The reason for this is that the interaction<br />

between individual components results in the intended behavior of the whole. These relations between<br />

structure <strong>and</strong> behavior are important to underst<strong>and</strong>, because when creating an approach to<br />

fault diagnosis, various viewpoints on these concepts can be used. Two very important viewpoint<br />

types are black box <strong>and</strong> white box. The definitions of these concepts that are used in this thesis are:<br />

Black Box: A model that describes the externally observable behavior, but does not state anything<br />

about the structure of the system, or behavior of internal components of the system.<br />

White Box: A model that describes the internally non-observable behavior as well as externally<br />

observable behavior. The behavior of the whole system is defined by the structure <strong>and</strong> the<br />

behavior of internal components.<br />

Many views on a system include more information than just system input <strong>and</strong> output, but do not<br />

provide a complete behavioral, or structural description of the system. These views are sometimes<br />

referred to as grey boxes, but terms like these are not well established. The problem with these<br />

terms is that it is not clear what is considered to be a ’complete’ white box, because a model is<br />

never complete. For this reason, in this thesis a model is called white box whenever it uses some<br />

structural or internal behavioral information. Otherwise, it is a black box model.<br />

3.1.4 Abductive Model versus Consistency-based Models<br />

The distinction between black box <strong>and</strong> white box models determines what information is used in<br />

the model. Another distinction determines how the information is stated. A distinction between a<br />

consistency-based <strong>and</strong> an abductive approach to fault diagnosis [18], is as follows:<br />

Abductive model: A model that defines a diagnosis as a set of abnormality assumptions that covers<br />

(or, in terms of logic, implies) the observations. [18, 24]<br />

Consistency-based model: A model that defines a diagnosis as a set of assumptions about a system<br />

component’s abnormal behavior such that observations of one component’s misbehavior are<br />

consistent with the assumption that all the other components are acting correctly [11, 25].<br />

The important difference between the two is that the former, an abductive model, defines effectto-cause<br />

relations between observables, while that latter defines cause-to-effect relations between<br />

observables (also called first principles). This requires different kinds of reasoning schemes.<br />

3.1.5 Effect-to-Cause versus Cause-to-Effect Reasoning<br />

In effect-to-cause reasoning, the effect ”there is no light” can be explained by the cause ”the light<br />

bulb is broken”, knowing that that when a light bulb is broken there is no light. In cause-to-effect<br />

reasoning, the fact ”the light bulb is broken” is the only cause that is consistent with the effect ”there<br />

is no light”. Let s be a symptom <strong>and</strong> f be a fault (e.g., the fault f denotes the cause ”the light bulb is<br />

broken”, <strong>and</strong> the symptom s denotes the effect ”there is no light”). In logic, the basic inference rule<br />

of abductive reasoning can be characterized by the following reasoning pattern [8]:<br />

s<br />

f → s<br />

⊢ f (3.1)<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!