pdf download - Software and Computer Technology - TU Delft
pdf download - Software and Computer Technology - TU Delft
pdf download - Software and Computer Technology - TU Delft
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.3 Basic Assumptions Model-Based Fault Diagnosis<br />
probability calculation of the LYDIA tool uses this assumption. Despite this, it is possible to reason<br />
about dependent faults. The inference mechanism of the MBD technique specifies a dependency<br />
between faults, the inference mechanism takes this into account.<br />
Other topics that are not yet fully solved by MBD technology are state <strong>and</strong> time.<br />
The previous part of this chapter briefly introduced the basics of MBD <strong>and</strong> the LYDIA approach<br />
to MBD. The remainder of this chapter introduces some more advanced topics. It is restricted to<br />
the parts that are necessary to achieve the goal of the project described in this thesis: presenting a<br />
proof-of-concept of a model-based approach to fault diagnosis, aimed at the Philips Cardio-Vascular<br />
X-Ray System. This proof-of-concept, that will be presented in the next chapter, requires that MBD<br />
achieves a higher diagnostic performance than the current approach. A higher diagnostic performance<br />
can be achieved by:<br />
1. Improving the diagnostic engine. Better <strong>and</strong> more sophisticated algorithms for solving<br />
a propositional model could increase the speed of diagnosis. This way, also larger-sized<br />
diagnostic problems become feasible. The work of [15] <strong>and</strong> [14] is in this area.<br />
2. Improving the model. If the model defines more relevant information, the diagnostic resolution<br />
<strong>and</strong> accuracy of diagnoses increase.<br />
3. Increasing the observability. A system that is in its use phase has a fixed observability.<br />
Part of the observations can be observed automatically, because it is available in some digital<br />
format. Other observations can only be made manually. Extra sensors could increase the<br />
observability of the system, <strong>and</strong> improve accuracy of diagnoses <strong>and</strong> diagnostic resolution.<br />
Considering the three points mentioned above, what are the important topics of model-based diagnosis,<br />
in respect to the work presented in this thesis?<br />
• ad 1. Currently, the time to produce a diagnosis is taking days, while a successful modelbased<br />
approach is able to produce diagnosis within milliseconds. Consequently, the proofof-concept<br />
does not require improvement of the diagnostic engine. A very slow algorithm<br />
already improves speed of diagnosis.<br />
• ad 2. Improving a model, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, is within the scope of this thesis. The next<br />
chapter discusses a case study of the model-based approach, <strong>and</strong> better models in this work<br />
allow for a proof of higher diagnostic performance. Section 4.4 introduces types of models,<br />
<strong>and</strong> ways to take on the modeling problem. In order to optimize the solution to the problem,<br />
Section 4.5 introduces a metric that can be used to estimate the quality of a model.<br />
• ad 3. Increasing observability is likely to increase diagnostic performance. Although, the<br />
Philips Cardio-Vascular System is fixed in respect to this work, a promising advantage is<br />
the following: the metric introduced in Section 4.5 allows to study which additional measurements<br />
have the highest effect on the accuracy. This way, it is possible to improve the<br />
diagnostic performance of systems in the design phase.<br />
So, improving the diagnostic engine is not important for this work, increasing observability is nice,<br />
but modeling is very important. Therefore, the next section introduces the modeling activity.<br />
38