Scientific Underpinnings of - START - National Consortium for the ...
Scientific Underpinnings of - START - National Consortium for the ...
Scientific Underpinnings of - START - National Consortium for the ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1.3 <strong>National</strong> Programs in Afghanistan<br />
The first step was to <strong>for</strong>ge a consensus between Afghan citizens, <strong>the</strong> Afghan government, and<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir international partners, that <strong>the</strong> overarching goal in Afghanistan was to create a legitimate<br />
and effective state capable <strong>of</strong> delivering services to <strong>the</strong> people and fulfilling its international<br />
obligations. This consensus was built around a vision, articulated by <strong>the</strong> government, and refined<br />
in a <strong>National</strong> Development Framework (NDF). This framework included three pillars:<br />
(1) Human Capital and Social Protection, (2) Physical Infrastructure, and (3) Trade and<br />
Investment, Public Administration and Rule <strong>of</strong> Law/Security, and articulated a series <strong>of</strong> crosscutting<br />
issues, such as gender equity, security and rule <strong>of</strong> law, and administrative and financial<br />
re<strong>for</strong>m. These three pillars were <strong>the</strong>n addressed through a series <strong>of</strong> twelve <strong>National</strong> Programs.<br />
The NDF underpinned <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong> Development Budget, which costed <strong>the</strong> programs. The vision<br />
and strategy laid out during <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> 2002 was subsequently framed within a comprehensive<br />
document, Securing Afghanistan’s Future, presented to an assembled group <strong>of</strong> 62 finance and<br />
<strong>for</strong>eign ministers from around <strong>the</strong> world on 31 st March and April 1 st 2004 in Berlin.<br />
<strong>National</strong> Programs were designed to overcome <strong>the</strong> fragmentation and confusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project<br />
model. They serve as implementation mechanisms to enable a government to per<strong>for</strong>m state<br />
functions throughout its territory in an effective and transparent manner. This is accomplished by<br />
mobilizing actors (including government, private sector and/or civil society) to per<strong>for</strong>m critical<br />
tasks, translating <strong>the</strong> vision and mission <strong>for</strong> each state function into credible outcomes. By<br />
providing a unified set <strong>of</strong> rules, clear decision rights and obligations were established, generating<br />
accountability. The design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> programs was intended to harness Afghan assets and to recast<br />
international assistance as catalytic to <strong>the</strong> state-building process. The end result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />
programs was an integrated architecture <strong>for</strong> facilitating good governance and development at<br />
various levels <strong>of</strong> government.<br />
<strong>National</strong> Programs seek to avoid recognized problems with traditional approaches to<br />
development assistance by harnessing national policy oversight to national capacity and<br />
combining it with extensive outreach and consultation to ensure transparent, effective,<br />
accountable aid delivery. The Afghan economic team, in partnership with a group <strong>of</strong> creative<br />
international actors, focused relentlessly on implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se programs during 2001–<br />
2004. <strong>National</strong> Programs in Afghanistan included those discussed below.<br />
<strong>National</strong> Solidarity Program (NSP)<br />
The first program to be designed by <strong>the</strong> Government, in partnership with <strong>the</strong> World Bank and<br />
UN Habitat, <strong>the</strong> NSP was designed to empower communities to manage <strong>the</strong> reconstruction<br />
process. 4 The government provided block grants <strong>of</strong> approximately $20,000 to every village in <strong>the</strong><br />
country against <strong>the</strong> requirement that each village elect a leadership council by secret ballot, hold<br />
participatory meetings to design recovery plans and projects, and post account documents in a<br />
public place. While <strong>the</strong> national government set <strong>the</strong> rules and managed financing, NGOs were<br />
contracted to manage <strong>the</strong> personnel and organizational issues, and an international firm was hired<br />
to provide management and oversight services. Thus <strong>the</strong> government provided a legal framework<br />
to empower a range <strong>of</strong> actors, including communities, while harnessing <strong>the</strong> considerable positive<br />
assets <strong>of</strong> international agencies, firms, and NGOs in a concerted, coherent fashion. Four years<br />
on, <strong>the</strong> program has seen more than 12,000 village development councils elected and more than<br />
19,000 project plans approved.<br />
17