31.07.2014 Views

Annual Report 2006

Annual Report 2006

Annual Report 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Taxonomic analysis of <br />

species, as the causal pathogens<br />

of soybean sudden death<br />

syndrome and dry bean root-rot<br />

The etiological agents of soybean sudden<br />

death syndrome (SDS) have been reported as <br />

or its forma specialis, f. sp. On<br />

the other hand, the causal pathogens of dry<br />

bean or mung bean root-rot have been known<br />

as f. sp. Soybean SDS<br />

pathogens isolated from the US, Argentina and<br />

Brazil, dry bean root-rot pathogens from the US<br />

and Japan, and mung bean root-rot pathogen<br />

from Canada were investigated. Detailed<br />

phenotypic comparisons of macro- and<br />

microscopic features, and phylogenetic analyses<br />

of multilocus DNA sequence data indicated that<br />

the soybean SDS and dry bean root-rot<br />

pathogens comprised six morphologically and<br />

phylogenetically distinct species (Fig. 5).<br />

Soybean SDS in North and South America (US,<br />

Argentina and Brazil) was found to be caused<br />

by four species: <br />

and an undescribed<br />

species of By way of contrast, dry or<br />

mung bean root-rot in North America (US and<br />

Canada) and Japan is caused by two closely<br />

related species, and <br />

The SDS species do not form an exclusive<br />

group within the molecular phylogeny, indicating<br />

they may not have a monophyletic origin.<br />

Artificial inoculation tests on a susceptible<br />

variety of soybean, using the isolates from<br />

soybeans, dry beans and mung beans, revealed<br />

that all six species can induce typical SDS<br />

symptoms on the inoculated soybean plants.<br />

Genome-wide gene expression<br />

analysis of <br />

pv. <br />

To survey genes regulated by HrpG or<br />

HrpX, we constructed a DNA macroarray<br />

system consisting of 2,384 of genomic DNA<br />

fragments of strain T7174 (MAFF311018) of<br />

It comprised about 95.5% of the whole<br />

genome DNA. Using this macroarray system, it<br />

was confirmed that the gene cluster (about<br />

87k to 120k region of the Xoo genome) was up<br />

regulated in wild type strain under inducing<br />

medium, while it was not up regulated<br />

in the ∆ and ∆ mutants (Fig. 6).<br />

Moreover, it was revealed that thirteen<br />

genomic regions were regulated by HrpG or<br />

HrpX. To check that expression of genes within<br />

these regions were really controlled by the<br />

HrpG or HrpX, a real-time quantitative RT-PCR<br />

system was used. Finally, six genes (XOO0037,<br />

XOO0078, XOO1388, XOO2263, XOO4042 and<br />

XOO4134) were newly identified. In addition,<br />

Fig. 5<br />

Four soybean SDS pathogens (A-C, F) and two<br />

dry bean root-rot pathogens (D, E)<br />

A: <br />

B: <br />

C: <br />

D: <br />

E: <br />

F: (undescribed species).<br />

Fig. 6<br />

Schematic representation of regions with up- and down<br />

-regulated gene expression in inducing condition<br />

( / wild type strain)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!