30.08.2014 Views

Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.6 Stat.900 Version 174 Release Notes

Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.6 Stat.900 Version 174 Release Notes

Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.6 Stat.900 Version 174 Release Notes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Version</strong> 167<br />

Issues Resolved<br />

<br />

The value of purchases recorded using VAT/Tax class - Purchases (Against Form - H<br />

Deemed Export) was not being captured in Form UPVAT - XXIV.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

On exporting the data of Annexure B by setting the option - Print with Item Details to Yes<br />

in Export Report screen, the Quantity/Measurement details were being captured<br />

incorrectly.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

In a purchase invoice, if VAT, excise duty and additional expense ledgers were selected, the<br />

values were getting captured incorrectly in Form UPVAT - XXIV.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

On selecting input additional tax ledger predefined with appropriate VAT/Tax classification in<br />

purchase invoice of composite VAT enabled Company, the additional tax amount was not<br />

being displayed.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

<strong>Version</strong> 166<br />

Issues Resolved<br />

<br />

The credit note passed in voucher mode using the flag - Change in Agreed Consideration<br />

was not reflecting in the row 7a(i) in Form UPVAT - XXIV.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

<br />

If a stock item with the option- Additional Tax Exempted enabled was selected in a purchase/sales<br />

transaction and Annexure A/Annexure B was generated with the option - Print<br />

with Item Details set to Yes, the item - wise bifurcation was capturing the additional tax<br />

amount.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

<strong>Version</strong> 165<br />

Issues Resolved<br />

<br />

While recording an Interstate Purchase transaction, if the CST value was entered manually<br />

instead of accepting the auto-calculated value, then incorrect assessable value was being displayed<br />

in column 7A(a) of UPVAT -XXIV. This behaviour was observed when CST ledger<br />

was created under Purchase Accounts with Method of calculation - On Total Sales and VAT/<br />

Tax Classification as Interstate Purchase @ 2% against Form C.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

<strong>Tally</strong>.<strong>ERP</strong> 9 <strong>Release</strong> <strong>Notes</strong> for <strong>Stat.900</strong><br />

©<strong>Tally</strong> Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!