30.08.2014 Views

Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.6 Stat.900 Version 174 Release Notes

Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.6 Stat.900 Version 174 Release Notes

Tally.ERP 9 Series A Release 3.6 Stat.900 Version 174 Release Notes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In an invoice, if one item amongst the multiple stock items selected had alternate unit of<br />

measure, the cleared quantity of this item was being displayed in alternate units instead of<br />

primary unit in the XML file generated for ER-1 e-return.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

2.2 Payroll<br />

<br />

There was a mismatch in the gross income value captured in income tax Annexure - II<br />

and ITR-I.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

<br />

In Form 16, the TDS paid for multiple quarters of the Financial Year on a particular date of<br />

Next Financial Year was getting captured as payment for the quarter in which the entries were<br />

recorded.<br />

For example: Total of TDS paid for December and January in March was reflecting as<br />

amount paid for March in Form 16.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

2.3 Service Tax<br />

<br />

While recording sales invoice, if the selected taxable income/expense ledger was predefined<br />

with a taxable percentage of 75% without notification number, the tax rate was changing to<br />

25% if the option - Allow alteration of Taxable Percentage was enabled in Service Tax<br />

Configuration screen.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

2.4 Value Added Tax<br />

Bihar<br />

The value of entries recorded using VAT/Tax class - Sales @ 13.5% was not reflecting in<br />

Part 2 - Turnover of Sales column of Form RT-I.<br />

This issue have been resolved.<br />

<br />

The value of entries recorded in credit note by selecting Others in Used for field was not<br />

getting captured in box 4 of Form RT-I.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

Delhi<br />

In Annexure 2A and 2B, the consignee name and address details were being captured in<br />

place of buyer name and address.<br />

This issue has been resolved.<br />

<strong>Tally</strong>.<strong>ERP</strong> 9 <strong>Release</strong> <strong>Notes</strong> for <strong>Stat.900</strong><br />

©<strong>Tally</strong> Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!