03.09.2014 Views

Crisman Annual Report 2009 - Harold Vance Department of ...

Crisman Annual Report 2009 - Harold Vance Department of ...

Crisman Annual Report 2009 - Harold Vance Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Characterization <strong>of</strong> Rock Transport Properties in Tight Gas and Shale<br />

Objectives<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this work is to determine transport<br />

properties such as permeability, porosity, and<br />

fracture characteristics in very low permeability<br />

rocks such as tight gas sandstone and shale. Further,<br />

we would be characterizing stress-induced changes<br />

in permeability in these low permeability rocks.<br />

This would be done using the pulse permeameter<br />

and steady-state measurements using under<br />

triaxial stress. Generally, “Pressure Pulse Test”<br />

is recommended in tight gas and shale reservoirs<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> conventional “Steady State Permeability<br />

Test”. The “Pressure Pulse Permeameter” machine<br />

in Rock Mechanics Lab can be a good tool for<br />

determining rock properties.<br />

permeability/porosity check plugs to make sure the<br />

values are precise. After calibrations and validations,<br />

we will be ready to measure permeability/porosity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tight core samples.<br />

Approach<br />

During this month and the last month, we focused<br />

on the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the transducers and found out<br />

that a part <strong>of</strong> the measured leakage rate came from<br />

the fluctuations in the outputs <strong>of</strong> the transducers.<br />

The downstream differential transducer had a larger<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> fluctuations. We tested the leakage rate<br />

in different system pressures using impermeable<br />

core plugs and determined that the leakage rates<br />

in upstream and downstream transducers are<br />

consistent, which means the leakage comes from a<br />

point which connects both sections.<br />

Accomplishments<br />

To reduce the data fluctuation in the downstream<br />

part, we changed the downstream transducer, then<br />

calibrated and tested again. The leakage rate in the<br />

downstream part decreased from 1.6 psi/hr to ~ 1.1<br />

psi/hr. Then, since the shortest route that connects<br />

upstream and downstream sections to each other is<br />

the core holder, we inspected the core holder again<br />

and wrapped the outer diameter <strong>of</strong> the rubber sleeve<br />

inside the core holder with extra aluminum foil. It<br />

covered the torn parts <strong>of</strong> the previously wrapped<br />

foil, which had been generated due to shrinkage and<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> the rubber sleeve. With these changes<br />

made, we tested the leakage and the rates were<br />

now 0.3 psi/hr for upstream and 0.36 psi/hr for<br />

downstream, which are reasonable.<br />

Future Work<br />

Since the machine has had several changes and<br />

manipulations, for the next month we should calibrate<br />

the volumes and (if possible) test it with known<br />

Project Information<br />

1.2.6 Transport Properties Characterization <strong>of</strong> Tight Gas<br />

Shales<br />

Contacts<br />

Ahmad Ghassemi<br />

979.845.2206<br />

ahmad.ghassemi@pe.tamu.edu<br />

Vahid Serajian<br />

CRISMAN INSTITUTE<br />

22<br />

<strong>Crisman</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2009</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!