03.09.2014 Views

Crisman Annual Report 2009 - Harold Vance Department of ...

Crisman Annual Report 2009 - Harold Vance Department of ...

Crisman Annual Report 2009 - Harold Vance Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CO 2<br />

Mobility Control using Cross-Linked Gel and CO 2<br />

Viscosifiers<br />

Objectives<br />

1. Investigate and test different approaches in the<br />

laboratory to control CO 2<br />

mobility during CO 2<br />

flooding to increase the overall efficiency.<br />

2. Develop a simulation model which would<br />

incorporate the CO 2<br />

viscosity relationship<br />

with pressure, then use this model to predict<br />

viscosified CO 2<br />

flooding efficiency in comparison<br />

with pure CO 2<br />

flooding.<br />

Accomplishments<br />

The visualization <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />

flow within core using CT-<br />

Scanning provides us with a more direct observation<br />

for the CO 2<br />

flood fronts in the core. We have studied<br />

two approaches to control CO 2<br />

mobility: HPAM/<br />

Cr(III) gel conformance control treatment, and the<br />

direct increase <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />

viscosity using viscosifier<br />

chemicals (PVAc or Polysiloxanes).<br />

For the study <strong>of</strong> gel conformance control, crosslinked<br />

HPAM/Cr(III) gel was applied to fractured cores<br />

in order to get incremental oil recovery. We have<br />

tested 10,000 ppm <strong>of</strong> high concentration gel and<br />

found out it had a better stability when compared<br />

with the 3,000 ppm gel we used previously. The<br />

10,000 ppm gel appeared to be more stable and<br />

also gave a higher pressure drop in CO 2<br />

flooding,<br />

which means better mobility control.<br />

For the study <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />

viscosifiers, a controlled CO 2<br />

flooding experiment using pure CO 2<br />

was conducted<br />

and the expected low recovery was obtained due to<br />

rapid breakthrough <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />

through the fracture. The<br />

first low molecular weight viscosifier was studied<br />

and we observed significant differences in CO 2<br />

flood<br />

front images. A more uniform, piston-like CO 2<br />

flood<br />

front was formed in the viscosifier case, suggesting<br />

a reduction in CO 2<br />

viscosity. Higher oil recovery was<br />

also observed using viscosified CO 2<br />

.<br />

A black-oil pseudo-miscible model for an oil field in<br />

Peru was developed using data from one <strong>of</strong> the wells.<br />

To account for the increase in CO 2<br />

viscosity, new<br />

viscosity/pressure relationships were integrated into<br />

the simulation model. We are currently simulating<br />

viscosified cases to develop cost benefit relations.<br />

Future Work<br />

More viscosifier chemical structures will be studied<br />

to compare the efficiency differences between low<br />

78<br />

and high molecular weight viscosifiers. The injection<br />

scheme will be altered to reflect field sequence <strong>of</strong><br />

events: we will begin with pure CO 2<br />

until no more<br />

oil is recovered, and then we will begin injecting<br />

viscosified CO 2<br />

to determine the incremental<br />

recovery caused by viscosified CO 2<br />

after pure CO 2<br />

injection. We will also develop simulation tools<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> accounting for viscosified CO 2<br />

cases.<br />

End <strong>of</strong> Coreflood for 3000 ppm gel:<br />

End <strong>of</strong> Coreflood for 10,000 ppm gel:<br />

Gel Strength Study - (red/yellow color shows gel distribution after CO 2<br />

flooding, blue color is the sandstone matrix. The sandstone core is fractured<br />

both horizontally and vertically. CO 2<br />

injection from right to left.)<br />

Pure CO 2<br />

flood image (after 1.6 PV CO 2<br />

injected)<br />

Viscosified CO 2<br />

flood image (after 1.3 PV CO 2<br />

injected)<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> pure CO 2<br />

flood front and viscosified CO 2<br />

flood front. The<br />

pure CO 2<br />

flood case has most <strong>of</strong> the CO2 concentrated in the fracture<br />

region. A more stable piston-like displacement is observed in the viscosified<br />

CO 2<br />

case.<br />

Project Information<br />

3.4.4 Application <strong>of</strong> X-Ray CT for Investigating Fluid Flow<br />

and Conformance Control during CO 2<br />

Injection in Highly<br />

Heterogenous Systems<br />

Contacts<br />

David Schechter<br />

979.845.2275<br />

david.schechter@pe.tamu.edu<br />

Shuzong Cai<br />

CRISMAN INSTITUTE<br />

<strong>Crisman</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2009</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!