03.09.2014 Views

Crisman Annual Report 2009 - Harold Vance Department of ...

Crisman Annual Report 2009 - Harold Vance Department of ...

Crisman Annual Report 2009 - Harold Vance Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Aquifer Management for CO 2<br />

Sequestration<br />

Objectives<br />

Among various possible solutions to mitigate the<br />

increasing concentration <strong>of</strong> “greenhouse gases” in<br />

the atmosphere, geological sequestration seems the<br />

most attractive and promising one. This research<br />

explores carbon dioxide sequestration in deep saline<br />

aquifers, and will study issues related to aquifer<br />

pressurization, monitoring, and risk mitigation using<br />

a numerical reservoir simulator that models the<br />

multiphase flow physics <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />

process using the<br />

Peng-Robinson equation <strong>of</strong> state (EOS).<br />

Approach<br />

Simulations clearly indicated that bulk CO 2<br />

injection<br />

into a single well could rarely inject the volume <strong>of</strong><br />

CO 2<br />

produced by the power plant in a typical aquifer,<br />

and that multiple wells would be required. In an<br />

array <strong>of</strong> injection wells, the aquifer volume allotted<br />

to each injection well is limited by interference with<br />

other injection wells. Therefore, modeling <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />

injection must consider a closed outer boundary,<br />

and bulk injection in a closed system will pressurize<br />

the aquifer. Simulations confirm this conclusion.<br />

An analytical model developed for this study extends<br />

a previously published one for an open aquifer to<br />

a closed aquifer. A spreadsheet model provides<br />

similar results to detailed simulation in a fraction <strong>of</strong><br />

the time, enabling systematic determination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

aquifer volume and the number <strong>of</strong> wells required to<br />

sequester the target amount <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />

. Results indicate<br />

that, depending on the aquifer properties, the<br />

sequestration operation would require thousands <strong>of</strong><br />

square miles <strong>of</strong> aquifer area or hundreds <strong>of</strong> wells or<br />

both. In either case, the aquifer must be pressurized,<br />

and CO 2<br />

would accumulate at the top <strong>of</strong> the aquifer,<br />

leading to an unacceptable risk <strong>of</strong> leakage.<br />

Over 30 years <strong>of</strong> simulations on injection have<br />

demonstrated the value <strong>of</strong> regular pressure fall<strong>of</strong>f<br />

monitoring <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />

injection wells. Fall<strong>of</strong>f responses<br />

provide ongoing indications <strong>of</strong> the dry zone and<br />

two-phase zone radii over time and quantification<br />

<strong>of</strong> the zone mobility values. For the case studied,<br />

these responses also provided reasonable estimates<br />

for the ongoing average aquifer pressure used<br />

for material balance analysis. In turn, analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> average pressure over time can indicate if the<br />

behavior is that <strong>of</strong> an open or closed aquifer and an<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> the aquifer size. Alternatively, average<br />

pressure over time can signal the presence <strong>of</strong> an leak<br />

and provide an estimation <strong>of</strong> how much fluid may<br />

be leaking from the aquifer and whether the leak is<br />

predominantly CO 2<br />

or brine. These results suggest<br />

that bulk CO 2<br />

injection is neither economically nor<br />

environmentally acceptable.<br />

To avoid pressurization and to reduce the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> wells required to sequester the CO 2<br />

, brine should<br />

be produced from the aquifer as a volume equal to<br />

that <strong>of</strong> the injected CO 2<br />

. This approach addresses<br />

the pressurization risk, but not the problem <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />

accumulating at the top <strong>of</strong> the aquifer.<br />

Significance<br />

An engineered system is proposed to both<br />

avoid aquifer pressurization and accelerate CO 2<br />

dissolution and trapping. This system would position<br />

a horizontal brine injection well above and parallel<br />

to a horizontal CO 2<br />

injection well with the brine<br />

production wells drilled parallel to the CO 2<br />

injection<br />

well at a specified lateral spacing. Simulations show<br />

that this configuration prevents CO 2<br />

accumulation at<br />

the top <strong>of</strong> the aquifer during injection, where 90% <strong>of</strong><br />

the CO 2<br />

is permanently dissolved or trapped during<br />

injection after 50 years, including the 30 years <strong>of</strong><br />

injection. This approach would greatly reduce the<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />

leakage both during and forever after<br />

injection.<br />

CRISMAN INSTITUTE<br />

Project Information<br />

4.1.8 Aquifer Management for CO 2<br />

Sequestration<br />

Related Publications<br />

Anchliya, A.: <strong>2009</strong>. Aquifer Management for CO 2<br />

Sequestration. MS thesis. Texas A&M U., College Station,<br />

Texas.<br />

Anchliya, A., Ehlig-Economides, C.A. Aquifer Management<br />

to Accelerate CO 2<br />

Dissolution and Trapping. Paper<br />

SPE 126688, presented at the <strong>2009</strong> SPE International<br />

Conference on CO 2<br />

Capture, Storage, and Utilization, San<br />

Diego, California, 2-4 November.<br />

Contacts<br />

Christine Ehlig-Economides<br />

979.458.0797<br />

c.economides@pe.tamu.edu<br />

Abhishek Anchliya<br />

82<br />

<strong>Crisman</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2009</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!