07.09.2014 Views

The ASA Handbook - Swimming.Org

The ASA Handbook - Swimming.Org

The ASA Handbook - Swimming.Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annual General Meeting<br />

9. Supplemental Question the South West. <strong>The</strong> South West were happy with the response but<br />

stated their interest was in keeping people in the programme to level 7 and beyond. Most Learn<br />

to Swim is through leisure centres and there is a conflict as they want to hold on to them rather<br />

than pass onto clubs. <strong>The</strong> South West sought assurance on this question.<br />

Response:<br />

Jon Glenn – Head of Schools <strong>Swimming</strong> assured the members that this was not the case and<br />

that the <strong>ASA</strong> is working with Learn To Swim providers to ensure that swimmers have an<br />

opportunity to join clubs and that a seamless pathway is established between Learn to Swim<br />

providers and clubs working in partnership. A subject area that was covered in the conference<br />

workshops.<br />

<strong>The</strong> response was accepted.<br />

10. South West - Page 47: Key Performance Indicators - Governance Structures and Partnerships -<br />

Starred Item B3<br />

What is the source of the 74.80% satisfaction survey? Could more ‘in depth’ details such as levels<br />

of satisfaction etc be provided?<br />

Response:<br />

This is a Sport England survey. <strong>The</strong> results are circulated to the Board and to regions.<br />

Paul Davies – Strategic Lead Grow.<br />

10.1. Supplemental question by the South West. Clarification was sought on the source of satisfaction<br />

survey in relation to the 74.8% result particularly as a detailed survey had been undertaken 2<br />

years previously by Dr Leigh Robinson which had shown much lower results.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Chief Operating Officer confirmed that the survey was carried out by Sport England and does<br />

take into account people who go swimming including Masters swimmers and general<br />

swimmers. It is a far more wide ranging survey and does help us as a sport to prioritise our<br />

strategic plans.<br />

<strong>The</strong> response was accepted.<br />

11. APPROVAL OF THE ANNUAL REPORT<br />

11.1. <strong>The</strong>re being no further questions on the annual report the members were asked to approve the<br />

annual report.<br />

Voting unanimous.<br />

12. FINANCIAL REPORT<br />

12.1. <strong>The</strong> Chairman advised members of an amendment on page 2 which read “directors” and should<br />

read “members” and that Starred Items C2 and C4 had been withdrawn.<br />

12.2. South West Page 58, Table 10 Starred Item C1 –<br />

Is it possible to have more information regarding Community <strong>Swimming</strong> Ltd?<br />

Response:<br />

Community <strong>Swimming</strong> Ltd is a charity owned by the <strong>ASA</strong> but is not a subsidiary of the <strong>ASA</strong>. <strong>The</strong><br />

aim of the company is to open up swimming and leisure provision in facilities which are not<br />

normally available to the general public. At present it is operating 655 learn to swim classes per<br />

week in LA Fitness sites for both members and non-members of LA Fitness. <strong>The</strong>re is a contract<br />

between Community <strong>Swimming</strong> Limited and the <strong>ASA</strong> for the provision of services for which the<br />

<strong>ASA</strong> receives a management fee.<br />

Jane Nickerson – Chief Operating Officer<br />

12.3. Supplemental Question by the South West. <strong>The</strong> South West region thanked officers for the<br />

clarification but raised a further question following a visit to the Charity Commission website and<br />

stated that the website indicated that information had only been submitted in September.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Chief Operating Officer was able to confirm that the reason for the lateness had been due to<br />

access codes issued by the Charity Commission not being given early enough for which they had<br />

accepted responsibility. <strong>The</strong>refore we were not anticipating any concerns being expressed for<br />

late notification from the Charity Commission.<br />

<strong>The</strong> response was accepted.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!