13.09.2014 Views

Published Report (DOT/FAA/CT-94-36)

Published Report (DOT/FAA/CT-94-36)

Published Report (DOT/FAA/CT-94-36)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

presented in table 2. Aircraft executed 30-degree localizer<br />

intercepts approximately 3 nautical miles (nmi) from their<br />

respective GSI point.<br />

TABLE 2.<br />

DIA ILS RUNWAY TURN-ON ALTITUDES<br />

Runway Outer Marker Turn-On Glide Slope<br />

(nmi) Altitude (ft) Intercept (mi)<br />

16 4.5 10,000 14.<strong>36</strong><br />

17R 4.9 11,000 17.5<br />

17L 4.8 9,000 11.21<br />

Although minor differences between touchdown zone elevations are<br />

planned for the runways at DIA, the simulation used a common<br />

touchdown zone altitude for all three runways because of current<br />

limitations in the simulation capabilities of the Target<br />

Generation Facility (TGF). GSI points also varied from the<br />

actual DIA operation due to the common touchdown zone elevation.<br />

The MPAP TWG and representatives from the Northwest Mountain<br />

Region and DIA concurred that the differences were minimal and<br />

would not affect controller performance.<br />

Approach plates were produced based upon the simulated airport<br />

configuration (see appendix E). The approach plates included<br />

runway layouts, spacings, and arrival frequencies. All flight<br />

simulator approaches in the simulation were made using these<br />

approach plates.<br />

2.1.3 Blunders.<br />

Aircraft blunders were used to test the controllers' ability to<br />

maintain a 500 ft distance between aircraft during critical<br />

situations. During each run of the simulation, blunders<br />

transpired without warning to the controllers. A blunder<br />

occurred when one aircraft, established on the ILS localizer<br />

approach, made an unexpected turn towards a second aircraft on an<br />

adjacent approach course.<br />

In normal operations, the controller detects the deviation of the<br />

blundering aircraft, issues instructions to resolve the<br />

situation, and the pilot verbally responds and complies as<br />

instructed. However, in some situations, the blundering aircraft<br />

may be unable to correct its deviation and may pass through the<br />

NTZ, and cross the adjacent approach course. This inability to<br />

correct the blunder can arise from several causes (e.g.,<br />

communications, hardware failure, human error, etc.). To<br />

simulate this situation, pilots of blundering aircraft were<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!