13.09.2014 Views

Published Report (DOT/FAA/CT-94-36)

Published Report (DOT/FAA/CT-94-36)

Published Report (DOT/FAA/CT-94-36)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.7 TECHNICAL OBSERVER STATEMENT.<br />

The technical observers unanimously agreed that controllers<br />

appeared to separate aircraft with relative ease. In their<br />

report, the technical observers stated that during the<br />

simulation, the controllers had little difficulty detecting and<br />

resolving blunders. In some cases, controller response times<br />

were actually slower, as the controllers took time to evaluate<br />

the situation prior to issuing instructions to the evading<br />

aircraft. Alert algorithms and runway spacings appeared to be<br />

factors which allowed controllers to take extra time when<br />

evaluating certain situations.<br />

In conclusion, the technical observers unanimously agreed,<br />

ll...triple simultaneous approaches at the DIA airport can be<br />

safely accomplished using the 4.8 second update radar and the<br />

final monitor aid.<br />

4.8 RISK ASSESSMENT.<br />

The analyses above have assessed the controllers' ability to<br />

resolve blunders during simultaneous parallel ILS approaches. It<br />

was observed that the controllers were not always able to<br />

maintain the test criterion miss distance of more than 500 ft<br />

between the blundering aircraft and aircraft on adjacent<br />

approaches. To properly evaluate the proposed operations, the<br />

effect of implementing the proposed operation on the level of<br />

risk found in today's operational environment must be determined.<br />

Ideally, the probability of an accident during the approach<br />

operation could be computed and compared to an acceptable<br />

probability. However, since the majority of approach operations<br />

are conducted to single approaches, no recorded accident has ever<br />

been attributable to a blunder occurring during multiple approach<br />

operations. Accordingly, little effort has been made to record<br />

and track blunder occurrences.<br />

A way to complete the risk analysis without operational blunder<br />

data is to determine a target risk value, and then to compute a<br />

blunder rate which would result in the target risk value. This<br />

would provide insight to the safety level of the operation, and<br />

allow the <strong>FAA</strong> to assess the acceptability of the operation. The<br />

computed blunder rate should not be used as the sole determining<br />

factor of whether the operation meets the target risk value.<br />

The total number of air carrier accidents as well as the number<br />

of fatal accidents on final approach has been extracted from the<br />

National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) data for the time<br />

period, 1983-1989. This number, together with the total number<br />

of ILS approaches during the time period, lead to an estimated<br />

fatal accident rate during ILS operations performed during IMC of<br />

4 x fatal accidents (ACC) per approach (APP). There are a<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!