Published Report (DOT/FAA/CT-94-36)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4. Identify which of the following alerted you to the occurrence: ( ) Self-Identified ( ) Pilot ( ) Other Controller ( ) Other 5. Were you distracted by anything which influenced the occurrence (presence of visitors, speaker volume, loud talking from others, etc.)? Explain 6. Brief explanation of traffic complexity: 11. CAUSAL FA<strong>CT</strong>ORS/RECOMMENDATIONS: Identify any of which you believe contributed to the incident: the following 1. Operational Factors: ( ) Equipment ( ( ) Traffic Volume ( Pilot Action ( Lack of Cooperation ( Oversight Other Explain all the items checked : F-6
111. STATEMENT: 1. From your knowledge of the incident, provide a narrative summary: 2. To prevent recurrence of a similar operational error/deviation, I recommend the following: F-7
Page 1 and 2:
1 DOT/FAA/CT-94/3 6 FAA Technical C
Page 3:
1. Title and Subtitle Technical Rep
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SU
Page 9:
Figure 1 2 3 4 5 6 LIST OF ILLUSTRA
Page 12 and 13:
An evaluation of NBO's and NTZ entr
Page 14 and 15:
One specific effect of high density
Page 16 and 17:
Technical Center. Indicated air spe
Page 18 and 19:
-: zg cui r - I -----1 s: i I - OM
Page 20 and 21:
sometimes instructed to disregard c
Page 22 and 23:
ILS Localizer Cen tex line A Note:
Page 24 and 25:
The Simulation Pilot Subsystem cons
Page 26 and 27:
provided by ARTS displays, FMA's pr
Page 28 and 29:
Controllers also submitted a report
Page 30 and 31:
a. NTZ transgression frequency: b.
Page 32 and 33:
3.3.1.1 No-Controller Intervention
Page 34 and 35:
analyses and the TWG operational as
Page 36 and 37:
I [OOOO l'OS66) [OOS6'0SP6) [0006'0
Page 38 and 39:
[OOSS' OSPS) [OOOS'OS6P) [OOSP' OSP
Page 41 and 42:
TABLE 8. TCV DATA, TWA621/AAL204 Bl
Page 43 and 44:
directed not to respond), the 17R c
Page 45 and 46: 4.2.6 Blunder Resolution Performanc
Page 47 and 48: [LSI [ssl [ESI L 35
Page 49 and 50: 4.4.2 Post-Simulation Controller Ou
Page 51 and 52: 4.5.2 Phraseoloav. The second state
Page 53 and 54: number of causes of accidents durin
Page 55 and 56: 1 ACC X 8 WCB's x 102 Itat risk" WC
Page 57 and 58: 5.3.2 Technical Observer Assessment
Page 59 and 60: BIBLIOGRAPHY Bilicki, H. W., TGF an
Page 61 and 62: GLOSSARY Aimort Surveillance Radar
Page 63 and 64: Outer Marker (OM) - A marker beacon
Page 65: APPENDIX A MULTIPLE PARALLEL APPROA
Page 69: APPENDIX B SIMULATION USING THE FDA
Page 72 and 73: Thus, the controller,s ability to d
Page 75: TECHNICAL OBSERVERS REPORT DIA SIMU
Page 79 and 80: FDADS SIMULATION AT DENVER A demons
Page 81: isk blunders, but only 2 TCV's. The
Page 85 and 86: ILS 10L DENVER INTERNATlONAL AIRPOR
Page 87: ILS 17L 1 DENVER TOWER 1205 1 DENVE
Page 91 and 92: POST-RUN CONTROLLER QUESTIONNAIRE D
Page 93 and 94: POST-SIMULATION CONTROLLER QUESTION
Page 95: CONTROLLER TEST CRITERION VIOLATION
Page 101 and 102: PILOT BREAK-OUT QUESTIONNAIRE DIA S
Page 103 and 104: 2.0 GENERAL COMMENTS I 2.1 Please p
Page 105: APPENDIX H CONTROLLER REPORT
Page 109: APPENDIX I TECHNICAL OBSERVER REPOR
Page 112 and 113: The Technical Observers believe tha
Page 115 and 116: .. v) CI t E" E 8 - a c .- 0 CI 5 2
Page 117: c X > 0 4 L 5-3
Page 121 and 122: MULTIPLE PARALLEL APPROACH PROGRAM
Page 123: APPENDIX L RISK ANALYSIS OF BLUNDER
Page 126 and 127: 2.0 BASIC RISK COMPUTATION 2.1 DEFI
Page 128 and 129: a fatal accident during an approach
Page 130 and 131: 3.4 ESTIMATING COLLISION RISK The f
Page 132 and 133: 4.0 DETERMINATION OF ALIGNMENT WIND
Page 134 and 135: The roots of the quadratic equation
Page 136 and 137: e estimated as the ratio of the num
Page 138: This is a very high rate, which wou
show all

Published Report (DOT/FAA/CT-94-36)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?