13.09.2014 Views

Published Report (DOT/FAA/CT-94-36)

Published Report (DOT/FAA/CT-94-36)

Published Report (DOT/FAA/CT-94-36)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.3.6 Site Coordinators.<br />

’<br />

A site coordinator was assigned to each flight simulator location<br />

to coordinate efforts with the test director at the <strong>FAA</strong> Technical<br />

Center and to support pilots during their participation in the<br />

simulation. Site coordinators acted as observers and did not aid<br />

the aircrews during their approaches. Their responsibilities<br />

included briefing aircrews, providing pilots with flight<br />

information prior to each approach, documenting approach<br />

information, and administering questionnaires to the pilots.<br />

2.3.7 Fliuht Simulator Pilots.<br />

Sixty current air carrier and air taxi pilots were assigned to<br />

fly the flight simulators. Two pilots were assigned to each<br />

flight simulator during each run of the simulation. Pilots<br />

rotated between roles (i.e., captain, first officer, observer)<br />

throughout the day.<br />

2.4 SIMULATION PROCEDURES.<br />

The simulation was conducted November 18 through November 20 and<br />

November 30 through December 17, 1992. Three, 2-hour runs were<br />

scheduled for each day. During the final week of the simulation,<br />

an additional l-hour run was conducted daily. Practice trials<br />

were scheduled for the entire first run on November 18 and the<br />

first hour of the first run on November 30 to acquaint<br />

controllers with the displayed triple approach operations and the<br />

radar/FMA configuration. Runs were not scheduled for Saturdays<br />

and Sundays.<br />

Controllers staffed their positions and issued appropriate<br />

control instructions to maintain separation between blundering<br />

and evading aircraft. With the exception of the pilots of<br />

blundering aircraft during no-response blunders, pilots would<br />

verbally respond and comply as instructed. Aircraft that<br />

blundered, or were vectored off their ILS as a result of a<br />

blunder, were removed from the traffic.<br />

3. DATA ANALYSIS.<br />

This section discusses the various qualitative and descriptive<br />

statistical approaches that were used to analyze the DIA<br />

simulation data.<br />

3.1 DATA COLLE<strong>CT</strong>ION.<br />

The controllers‘ ability to resolve blunders, including factors<br />

that potentially affected their performance, was examined using<br />

descriptive statistical and qualitative analyses. Data files<br />

included the following:<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!