Proceedings - Translation Concepts

More documents

Recommendations

Info

MuTra 2006 – Audiovisual Translation Scenarios: Conference Proceedings Jenny Mattsson McEnery, Tony (2005): Swearing in English. Bad Language and Power from1586 to the Present. London & New York: Routledge. Munday, Jeremy (2001): Introducing Translation Studies. Theory and Applications. London & New York: Routledge. Sahlin, Ingrid (2001): Tal och undertexter i textade svenska tv-program - probleminventering och förslag till analysmodell. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. [English Title: Speech and Intralingual Subtitling in Swedish TV programmes. Problems Examined and a Suggested Model for Analysis] Schröter, Thorsten (2005): Shun the Pun, Rescue the Rhyme? The Dubbing and Subtitling of Language-Play in Film. PhD Thesis. Karlstad University Studies: Karlstad. Sinha, Amresh (2004): “The Use and Abuse of Subtitles”. In Egoyan, A. & Balfour, I. (eds): Subtitles-on the foreignness of film. Cambridge - London: Alphabet City Media. The Swedish Ministry of Culture (2003): Betänkande. Ett korrekt och välfungerande språk [English Title: A Correct and Well-Functioning Language] Toury, Gideon (1995): Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Verschueren, Jef (1999): Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold. Internet sources Bokenblom, Mathilda (2005): Slang, ba! En studie av slangordbildning samt en jämförande studie av slangordsangivelser hos elever med svenska som modersmål kontra elever med annat modersmål än svenska. Unpublished BA thesis, Svenska som andraspråk. Humanistiska institutionen, Örebro University. (7th February 2006) Karjalainen, Markus (2002): Where have all the Swearwords gone? An analysis of the loss of swearwords in two Swedish translation of J.D. Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye. Pro Graduation thesis, Department of English, University of Helsinki. (10 th January, 2005) Mediamätningar i Skandinavien, MMS, [Media Research in Scandinavia] (http://www.mms.se> (21st November, 2005) The Swedish Language Council (2006): (12 th January, 2006) 56
Sara Ramos Pinto (Lisbon) Contents EU-High-Level Scientific Conference Series MuTra 2006 – Audiovisual Translation Scenarios: Conference Proceedings Theatrical Texts vs Subtitling Linguistic variation in a polymedial context 1 Some specifics of theatrical texts 2 Some Specifics of Subtitling 3 Linguistic varieties and their rhetoric purpose 4 Methodology of the study 5 Presence and meaning of the sub-standard variety in Bernard Shaw’s Pygmalion and Alan Jay Lerner's My Fair Lady 6 The target texts: normalization and innovation 7 Concluding remarks 8 References Abstract This article discusses the problem of translating into Portuguese a sub-standard variety of British English into Portuguese within a polymedial context. The discourse develops its structure according to the channel selected and, since the two main communication channels are written and spoken, it is possible to identify the written and oral modes as two distinct variations. Investigating the way in which the oral mode is represented in the written mode is of particular relevance in subtitling because the two modes appear simultaneously. Different media have different functions requiring different priorities. In the translation process the translator needs to set priorities with different types of discourse imposing different kinds of limitations. So that priorities must be set in different ways. This article will present a comparative study of three translations rendered for the purpose of theatrical performance and five translations rendered for the purpose of subtitling of Bernard Shaw’s Pygmalion and Alan Jay Lerner’s My Fair Lady. I will try to understand how the variable “medium” influences the translator’s decisions with respect to the kind of linguistic varieties in the translation, ie which limitations were found and which new opportunities opened up. 1 Some specifics of theatrical texts Following Bassnet's (1990) and Aaltonen's (2003) writings, I will consider theatrical texts as different from dramatical texts in terms of distribution as well as aesthetics and ideologies. We are faced with two different visions of theater translation, which generate two different kinds of translation in accordance with two distinct notions of performability: one is close to the text itself, another to a specific performance style of a given company (Espasa 2000: 52). In a translation intended for performance the expectations of the audience have a great influence on the translator’s decisions, in a translation meant for publication, the gender conventions will certainly be much more important in the decisions taken by the translator. When translating or analyzing a translation rendered for theatrical performance, therefore, a number of aspects need to be taken into account as is described below. © Copyright 2006-2007 by MuTra 57
Page 1 and 2:
Marie Curie EU High Level Scientifi
Page 3:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I: Multiling
Page 6 and 7:
MuTra 2006 - Audiovisual Translatio
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11: MuTra 2006 - Audiovisual Translatio
Page 18 and 19: Eduard Bartoll (Barcelona) Contents
Page 38 and 39: Lena Hamaidia (Sheffield) EU-High-L
Page 42 and 43: 3 Marked Structures MuTra 2006 - Au
Page 46 and 47: Scene 2: I know Sign Language MuTra
Page 70 and 71: Stavroula Sokoli (Athens) EU-High-L
Page 78 and 79: EU-High-Level Scientific Conference
Page 96 and 97: I would like to raise five issues:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Francisco Utray Delgado (Madrid) U-
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
EU-High-Level Scientific Conference
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Sabine Braun (Surrey) Contents EU-H
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
6 The accent of the voice MuTra 200
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
show all

Proceedings - Translation Concepts

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?