20.10.2014 Views

Chapter 2. Progress towards the EFA goals - Unesco

Chapter 2. Progress towards the EFA goals - Unesco

Chapter 2. Progress towards the EFA goals - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

2<br />

Education for All Global Monitoring Report<br />

In Chile,<br />

a programme<br />

aimed<br />

at achieving<br />

early childhood<br />

care for<br />

all 4-year-olds<br />

has targeted<br />

<strong>the</strong> poorest<br />

households<br />

Bolivia<br />

Nicaragua<br />

Haiti<br />

Côte d’Ivoire<br />

Madagascar<br />

Kenya<br />

Botswana<br />

Viet Nam<br />

Lesotho<br />

Philippines<br />

Zambia<br />

Niger<br />

Togo<br />

Rwanda<br />

Mongolia<br />

Uganda<br />

Egypt<br />

mo<strong>the</strong>r with no education carries a large handicap<br />

when it comes to early childhood care, regardless<br />

of age, gender or place of residence (Figures <strong>2.</strong>5<br />

and <strong>2.</strong>6). Living in one of Zambia’s poorest<br />

households cuts <strong>the</strong> chance of participating in<br />

early childhood care by a factor of 12 compared<br />

with children in <strong>the</strong> wealthiest households, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> factor rises to 25 in Uganda and 28 in Egypt<br />

(Nonoyama-Tarumi et al., 2008). Such figures<br />

demonstrate <strong>the</strong> degree to which early childhood<br />

provision is reinforcing inequalities associated<br />

with <strong>the</strong> home environment.<br />

Why do children from disadvantaged households<br />

face <strong>the</strong> highest barriers to entry? In some cases,<br />

it is because facilities are too far from <strong>the</strong>ir homes.<br />

In o<strong>the</strong>rs, facilities are accessible but unaffordable<br />

– a problem that has held back efforts to expand<br />

coverage in Egypt (UNESCO, 2008a). However,<br />

several countries have succeeded in expanding<br />

access. In Chile, a programme aimed at achieving<br />

early childhood care for all 4-year-olds has<br />

targeted <strong>the</strong> poorest income groups (Box <strong>2.</strong>4).<br />

Figure <strong>2.</strong>5: Children from rich families are more likely<br />

to participate in early childhood programmes<br />

Likelihood of 3- and 4-year-olds participating in early learning<br />

programmes, children from <strong>the</strong> richest 20% compared with children<br />

from <strong>the</strong> poorest 20%<br />

Egyptian children from<br />

<strong>the</strong> richest families are<br />

more than 25 times<br />

more likely than those<br />

from <strong>the</strong> poorest<br />

to participate in early<br />

childhood programmes<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Odds ratios for <strong>the</strong> likelihood of participation<br />

in early childhood programmes<br />

Notes: Using odds ratios (see glossary), this figure compares <strong>the</strong> likelihood<br />

of young children participating in early learning programmes, depending on<br />

<strong>the</strong> wealth status of <strong>the</strong>ir families. Specifically, odds ratios provide an estimate<br />

of <strong>the</strong> differences in probability of attending early childhood programmes between<br />

one reference group (<strong>the</strong> poorest 20%) and ano<strong>the</strong>r (<strong>the</strong> richest 20%), and <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

estimated from a logistic regression with five dependent variables: gender, age,<br />

place of residence, mo<strong>the</strong>r’s level of education and household wealth.<br />

Source: Nonoyama-Tarumi et al. (2008).<br />

Rich countries have also struggled to meet equity<br />

<strong>goals</strong>. There is extensive evidence from <strong>the</strong><br />

European Union that low-income families and<br />

immigrants have less access to good-quality early<br />

childhood care (Arnold and Doctoroff, 2003;<br />

Nusche, 2009; Sylva et al., 2007).<br />

Evidence from <strong>the</strong> United States also documents<br />

large disparities (Barnett et al., 2008). Families<br />

with incomes just above <strong>the</strong> poverty line face<br />

some of <strong>the</strong> greatest difficulties in gaining access,<br />

demonstrating <strong>the</strong> importance of targeting<br />

households at this level. Maternal education also<br />

has a marked bearing on United States pre-school<br />

participation: attendance rates of 4-year-olds are<br />

55% for children of mo<strong>the</strong>rs who have dropped<br />

out of secondary school but 87% for children of<br />

mo<strong>the</strong>rs with a college education (Barnett et al.,<br />

2008; Barnett and Yarosz, 2007).<br />

On a more positive note, several governments are<br />

scaling up early childhood care as part of wider<br />

anti-poverty initiatives. In <strong>the</strong> United Kingdom,<br />

Sure Start, a flagship strategy introduced in 1997<br />

to tackle child poverty, social exclusion and<br />

educational disadvantage, now reaches <strong>2.</strong>4 million<br />

families (Every Child Matters, 2009).<br />

Figure <strong>2.</strong>6: Children of educated mo<strong>the</strong>rs are more likely<br />

to attend pre-school programmes<br />

Likelihood of 3- and 4-year-olds participating in early learning<br />

programmes, children of mo<strong>the</strong>rs with secondary education<br />

or higher compared with children of mo<strong>the</strong>rs with no education<br />

Zambia<br />

Egypt<br />

Dominican Rep.<br />

India<br />

Lesotho<br />

Madagascar<br />

Côte d’Ivoire<br />

Cameroon<br />

Viet Nam<br />

Chad<br />

Niger<br />

Burundi<br />

Children in Burundi<br />

with educated mo<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

are ten times more likely<br />

to participate in early<br />

childhood programmes<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12<br />

Odds ratios for <strong>the</strong> likelihood of participation<br />

in early childhood programmes<br />

Notes: This figure compares <strong>the</strong> likelihood of young children participating in<br />

early learning programmes, based on <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r’s education level. The odds<br />

ratios are calculated in <strong>the</strong> same way as those in Figure <strong>2.</strong>5 for different<br />

reference groups: one consists of children with a mo<strong>the</strong>r with no education<br />

and ano<strong>the</strong>r of children with a mo<strong>the</strong>r having secondary education or higher.<br />

Source: Nonoyama-Tarumi et al. (2008).<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!