20.10.2014 Views

Chapter 2. Progress towards the EFA goals - Unesco

Chapter 2. Progress towards the EFA goals - Unesco

Chapter 2. Progress towards the EFA goals - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PROGRESS TOWARDS THE <strong>EFA</strong> GOALS<br />

Youth and adult literacy<br />

Figure <strong>2.</strong>30: In developing countries, illiteracy can affect<br />

from one to three out of four adults<br />

Adult (15 and over) illiteracy rates in countries with rates of 25%<br />

or more in selected regions, 2000–2007 1<br />

Arab States (19)<br />

Iraq<br />

Egypt<br />

Sudan* ,2<br />

Yemen<br />

Mauritania<br />

Morocco<br />

India<br />

Nepal<br />

Pakistan*<br />

Bangladesh<br />

Bhutan*<br />

Afghanistan*<br />

Kenya*<br />

Uganda<br />

U. R. Tanzania<br />

Nigeria<br />

Malawi<br />

Madagascar*<br />

Zambia<br />

Cameroon*<br />

Angola*<br />

D. R. Congo*<br />

Ghana<br />

Rwanda*<br />

Eritrea<br />

Burundi*<br />

Liberia<br />

Togo *<br />

Côte d’Ivoire*<br />

C. A. R. *<br />

Mozambique<br />

Senegal*<br />

Benin<br />

Sierra Leone<br />

Ethiopia<br />

Chad<br />

Guinea*<br />

Burkina Faso*<br />

Niger*<br />

Mali*<br />

South and West Asia (9)<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa (41)<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />

Adult illiteracy rates (%)<br />

Regional<br />

average<br />

29%<br />

Regional<br />

average<br />

36%<br />

Regional<br />

average<br />

38%<br />

Notes: For countries indicated with *, national observed literacy data are used.<br />

For all o<strong>the</strong>rs, UIS literacy estimates are used. The estimates were generated using<br />

<strong>the</strong> UIS Global Age-specific Literacy Projections model. Figures in paren<strong>the</strong>ses after<br />

region names indicate <strong>the</strong> number of countries with publishable data in <strong>the</strong> region.<br />

1. Data are for <strong>the</strong> most recent year available during <strong>the</strong> period specified. See <strong>the</strong><br />

web version of <strong>the</strong> introduction to <strong>the</strong> statistical tables for a broader explanation<br />

of national literacy definitions, assessment methods, and sources and years of data.<br />

<strong>2.</strong> Data do not include all geographic regions.<br />

Source: Annex, Statistical Table <strong>2.</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> number of adult illiterates in <strong>the</strong> world fell by<br />

13%. Given that population growth pushed <strong>the</strong> adult<br />

population up by around 30% in <strong>the</strong> same period,<br />

<strong>the</strong> net effect is clearly positive. Adult literacy levels<br />

increased more rapidly than in <strong>the</strong> 1990s (Qiao,<br />

2007), growing by 10% to reach 84% in 2000-2007.<br />

Box <strong>2.</strong>20: A new generation of literacy statistics<br />

New approaches to literacy measurement are attempting<br />

to address long-standing data problems. One prominent<br />

example is <strong>the</strong> Literacy Assessment and Monitoring<br />

Programme (LAMP).<br />

Conventional approaches to literacy measurement are often<br />

fundamentally flawed. Asking people to report whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are literate is of limited use in assessing real capabilities.<br />

Similarly, testing literacy by reference to words, objects and<br />

experiences that have no relevance in <strong>the</strong> lives of <strong>the</strong> people<br />

being surveyed can understate achievement levels.<br />

The LAMP approach tests literacy in three domains:<br />

continuous texts (prose), non-continuous texts (documents)<br />

and numeracy. Results reflect a continuum of achievement,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> tests are designed to be meaningful to respondents.<br />

Data generated through <strong>the</strong> tests are intended for national<br />

and cross-national comparisons. Developed by <strong>the</strong> UIS<br />

and administered through ministries of education, LAMP<br />

surveys are in <strong>the</strong> pilot stage in several countries.<br />

Sources: UIS (2009c, 2009d).<br />

The broadly positive global canvas hides some<br />

less encouraging developments (Figure <strong>2.</strong>31).<br />

Almost all <strong>the</strong> decline in <strong>the</strong> number of illiterate<br />

adults in <strong>the</strong> developing world took place in just<br />

one region, East Asia and <strong>the</strong> Pacific. In South<br />

and West Asia, population growth cancelled<br />

out <strong>the</strong> decline in numbers of illiterate adults.<br />

In sub-Saharan Africa, <strong>the</strong> number of illiterates<br />

increased by 19.5 million. The Arab States also<br />

experienced an increase. Some countries<br />

witnessed large absolute increases in <strong>the</strong><br />

number of illiterate adults: over 1 million in<br />

Burkina Faso, <strong>the</strong> Philippines, Senegal, <strong>the</strong><br />

United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam,<br />

and 4 million in Bangladesh and Ethiopia<br />

(see annex, Statistical Table 2).<br />

The idea that countries are powerless to<br />

combat adult illiteracy is refuted by <strong>the</strong><br />

experience of countries that have achieved rapid<br />

progress. The following are examples of positive<br />

change between 1985–1994 and 2000–2007:<br />

Much of <strong>the</strong> illiteracy reduction in East Asia<br />

can be traced to China. The number of<br />

adult illiterates <strong>the</strong>re fell by 114 million<br />

or 62% between <strong>the</strong> two periods, with an<br />

average increase in <strong>the</strong> number of adult<br />

literates of 4 million between 1990 and 2000<br />

(NCEDR, 2008).<br />

Adult literacy<br />

levels grew by<br />

10% to reach 84%<br />

in 2000-2007<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!