CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Research - Pluto - University of ...
CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Research - Pluto - University of ...
CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Research - Pluto - University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Future Work<br />
The overall lesson learned was that the EOF<br />
along the bottom had much more effect than the<br />
EF on the microbeads. This is highly relevant to<br />
micr<strong>of</strong>luidics, because small channels have<br />
higher surface area/volume ratios, increasing the<br />
contribution <strong>of</strong> the EOF. Further work to<br />
increase bead velocity in such a system should<br />
therefore focus on maximizing EOF instead <strong>of</strong><br />
EF. In addition, one could use positively<br />
charged beads, so that the effects <strong>of</strong> EF and EOF<br />
would add, instead <strong>of</strong> opposing each other.<br />
These effects are maximized at opposite ends <strong>of</strong><br />
the pH spectrum, but an optimum pH could be<br />
found that produces the greatest net effect. On<br />
the other hand, EF may become negligible<br />
compared to EOF in smaller channels, so it may<br />
be practical to use uncharged beads (they would<br />
have the added benefit <strong>of</strong> not adhering to the<br />
surface itself, which was a problem with the<br />
charged beads). Others have designed<br />
micropumps that work on the principle <strong>of</strong><br />
EOF—it may be practical to use such a pump to<br />
pressurize the entire system and control motion<br />
with valves, instead <strong>of</strong> spanning the channels<br />
with voltage and using EOF to move beads<br />
directly and selectively.<br />
42 <strong>CMDITR</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Undergraduate</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Vol. 1 No. 1 Summer 2004