23.10.2014 Views

CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Research - Pluto - University of ...

CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Research - Pluto - University of ...

CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Research - Pluto - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

absorbance is proportional to concentration, the<br />

slopes for the different time intervals were<br />

normalized per chromophore by dividing by<br />

initial absorbance.<br />

Results<br />

Ideally, conditions for the 1-, 2-, 4-, 10-<br />

minute intervals would dictate that the<br />

normalized slopes would be identical, with a<br />

better resolution <strong>of</strong> the decomposition curve for<br />

1-minute intervals. However, going from 1-<br />

minute to 10-minutes, the slope <strong>of</strong>ten increased<br />

by a whole order <strong>of</strong> magnitude. Reasons for this<br />

could be temperature (during the 10-minute<br />

intervals, the temperature in the UV light-box<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten went above 50°, while in the 1-minute<br />

intervals, the temperature rarely rose above 33°),<br />

or the multiple starts and stops during testing<br />

(each time the plate was taken out <strong>of</strong> the UV<br />

light-box so it could be scanned on the<br />

spectrophotometer, the crosslinking reaction<br />

came to a stop and had to start back up again<br />

with a smaller concentration <strong>of</strong> chalcone than<br />

before.) Regardless, though the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the<br />

slope increased considerably from 1- to 2- to 4-<br />

minutes, only a 12—25% difference was evident<br />

between 4- and 10-minutes.<br />

Between the plates with chalcone and plates<br />

without, except EZ-FTC, chalcone seemed to<br />

increase the decomposition by a whole order <strong>of</strong><br />

magnitude.<br />

Though each chromophore has a different<br />

extinction coefficient, making cross-comparison<br />

difficult, even a cursory visual evaluation<br />

showed the chromophores with ethylene linkages<br />

to be less stable that the SHJ chromophores<br />

without ethylene linkages, both with chalcone<br />

and without. The absorbances <strong>of</strong> the ethylenelinked<br />

compounds seemed to drop to half within<br />

20—30 minutes, while the compounds lacking<br />

ethylene linkages appeared to decompose<br />

minimally. EZ-FTC, in particular, not only<br />

showed a steep decomposition that appeared to<br />

be at least an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude greater than<br />

SHJ1, but also showed an abnormally high<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> unlinked chalcone (implying that EZ-<br />

FTC absorbed and reacted with the UV light<br />

before the chalcone could). As EZ-FTC<br />

decreased, a new peak near 400nm also appeared<br />

(this behavior seems like it may be a mild<br />

analogue to the instability found in D. Casmier’s<br />

thiazole-forward molecules.)<br />

Conclusions<br />

Due to the time limitations on the research,<br />

some data was not satisfactory or completely<br />

consistent. However, it seems that with or<br />

without chalcone, chromophores lacking<br />

ethylene linkages are markedly more stable than<br />

the conventional EZ-FTC-style chromophores<br />

with ethylene linkages. More rigorous and<br />

extensive testing and re-testing will be required<br />

to say definitively, possibly using inert-gas<br />

atmosphere, temperature-controlled conditions,<br />

and real-time absorbance monitoring that does<br />

not require taking the chromophore out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

UV light-source.<br />

In light <strong>of</strong> the inherent instability which<br />

seems to exist with UV-exposure <strong>of</strong> ethylenelinked<br />

chromophores and hydroxyl-chalcone, I<br />

recommend that future photo-crosslinking<br />

studies look into using chromophores that do not<br />

include the vulnerable ethylene linkage.<br />

References<br />

1. Lu, J. and J. Yin. 2003. J. Polym. Sci.<br />

41:2:303-312.<br />

2. Ramireddy, A.V., K. Subramanian, V.<br />

Krishnasamy and J. Ravichandran, 1996. J.<br />

Eur. Polym. 32,:8:919-926.<br />

<strong>CMDITR</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Undergraduate</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Vol. 1 No. 1 Summer 2004 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!