23.10.2014 Views

CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Research - Pluto - University of ...

CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Research - Pluto - University of ...

CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Research - Pluto - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

would begin. A marker was created using<br />

AutoCAD 2004, exported as a “.stl” file,<br />

converted into a “.3dml” file using python, and<br />

then fabricated onto the substrate using<br />

LabVIEW (“fabricate solid GPIB.vi”, “fabricate<br />

solid GPIB 7.vi”). The marker is necessary to<br />

locate the voxels that are being created for the<br />

experiment. Next, the voxels were created by<br />

opening and closing the shutter using LabVIEW<br />

(“expose for interval.vi”). The voxels were<br />

separated by five microns, and they were spaced<br />

by using the piezoelectric Nanocube s<strong>of</strong>tware,<br />

which allows for 100 microns <strong>of</strong> movement in<br />

three dimensions. The vertical movement was<br />

not used while spacing the voxels. The<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> the voxels was originally taken<br />

with an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) and<br />

the later measurements were taken with a<br />

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).<br />

The secondary objective <strong>of</strong> support<br />

manufacturing for others required designs and<br />

instructions for the desired object to be<br />

fabricated. Once these designs were provided,<br />

the object was created in AutoCAD 2004, again<br />

exported as a “.stl” file, converted into a “.3dml”<br />

file using python, and then fabricated onto the<br />

substrate provided by the researcher who desires<br />

the fabrication using LabVIEW (“fabricate solid<br />

GPIB.vi”, “fabricate solid GPIB 7.vi”, “fabricate<br />

solid GPIB v2_1 no_display.vi”). The substrates<br />

provided were poly-di-methyl silane (PDMS),<br />

quartz and optical fiber, and 40 micron deep<br />

chambers on quartz. Preparation and cleaning <strong>of</strong><br />

the substrates was the same as before. The area<br />

<strong>of</strong> fabrication was much more difficult to find<br />

under the objective lens in comparison to the<br />

voxel volume-filling rate experiment.<br />

Results/Intended Results<br />

The voxel volume-filling rate experiment<br />

was designed to determine whether or not there<br />

was a limiting volume with respect to the<br />

exposure time. The plot in Table 1 shows data<br />

that has a fairly linear trend. This is the only true<br />

data that was extracted from the samples thus far.<br />

The support manufacturing with Dr. Deirdre<br />

Meldrum and her graduate student Pahnit<br />

Seriburi yielded unfortunate results. First,<br />

fabrication had to occur in a channel carved in<br />

PDMS that was 10 microns deep, 100 microns<br />

across, and 25 millimeters across. The vowels<br />

created were longer than originally thought, so as<br />

fabrication continued within the channel, the<br />

final structure that should have been 10 microns<br />

tall was closer to 12 microns tall, which<br />

defeated the purpose <strong>of</strong> fabricating in the<br />

channel. By fabricating the funnel 12 microns<br />

tall, the experiment that Pahnit Seriburi was<br />

attempting to run could not be started simply<br />

because the structure fabricated protruded over<br />

the top <strong>of</strong> the PDMS, which was going to be<br />

placed on top <strong>of</strong> a glass substrate. Also, when<br />

attempting to fabricate filters for the PDMS<br />

channel, the filters would not remain vertical, or<br />

were not sturdy enough to withstand the amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> fluid being forced through them. Continuing<br />

with this experiment, it was then decided to<br />

attempt to fabricate a mold <strong>of</strong> the funnel.<br />

However, the PDMS will not backfill within the<br />

resolution <strong>of</strong> the mold desired and created.<br />

Support manufacturing with Dr. Antao Chen<br />

and his graduate student Travis Sherwood did<br />

not produce the desired results from the<br />

fabrication aspect, but did present results<br />

involving the resilience <strong>of</strong> the polymer and the<br />

ability to remove the polymer from the substrate<br />

to place it on another. The fabrication <strong>of</strong> the<br />

micro-ring was difficult to produce because the<br />

desired location was to have the edge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

circle tangent to the edge <strong>of</strong> the core. The microrings<br />

were then moved on the substrate, removed<br />

from the substrate and placed on another<br />

substrate, and stretched like elastic bands, all<br />

with a micromanipulator.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Through the voxel volume-filling rate<br />

experiment, support manufacturing, and free<br />

exploration it has been determined that the power<br />

<strong>of</strong> the laser can be reduced and the resolution <strong>of</strong><br />

the objects fabricated has been refined by<br />

defining finer resolution in the program python.<br />

Other ways to help refine the resolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

final product is to slow the translation speed <strong>of</strong><br />

the Nanocube, optimizing the shutter reaction<br />

speed during all scans rather than some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

scans, post-bake the product once the fabrication<br />

has completed, and attempt to lower the power<br />

even further as long as it does not fall below the<br />

polymerization threshold. The voxel volumefilling<br />

rate has so far not returned any conclusive<br />

results.<br />

Being able to remove the micro-rings from<br />

the substrate shows that the polymer is not<br />

actually adhering to the substrate, rather there are<br />

weak bonds between the substrate and the<br />

created polymer. Also, the resilience <strong>of</strong> the<br />

polymer was tested and shows that it is fairly<br />

strong on the micro scale, and very elastic.<br />

62 <strong>CMDITR</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Undergraduate</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Vol. 1 No. 1 Summer 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!