08.11.2014 Views

download the full article here - EISRJC

download the full article here - EISRJC

download the full article here - EISRJC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An inception meeting-workshop<br />

between LRD-PCARRD and <strong>the</strong> implementers<br />

were held to discuss <strong>the</strong> project’s concept,<br />

methodology, expected outputs, and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

pertinent issues. Concerns such as criteria for<br />

site and farmer selection, data to be ga<strong>the</strong>red<br />

for site characterization, data/information to be<br />

ga<strong>the</strong>red during regular monitoring activities,<br />

roles/responsibilities of project partners, etc.<br />

were discussed and firmed up.<br />

Selection of project sites<br />

Prior to project site selection, secondary<br />

data in terms of goat population and largest<br />

goat-producing municipalities in Cagayan Valley<br />

were ga<strong>the</strong>red from <strong>the</strong> Provincial Veterinary<br />

Office of <strong>the</strong> Isabela Provincial Government.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> secondary data,<br />

Echague and Alicia Isabela were <strong>the</strong> top two<br />

municipalities with <strong>the</strong> highest concentration<br />

of goat population. Field validation was<br />

undertaken to validate <strong>the</strong> secondary data<br />

ga<strong>the</strong>red and to determine <strong>the</strong> villages which<br />

will serve as focal and control sites. Echague<br />

Isabela was selected as <strong>the</strong> project focal sites<br />

while, Alicia Isabela was identified to serve as<br />

<strong>the</strong> control site. Meeting with <strong>the</strong> officers of<br />

Echague Goat Raisers/Producers Association<br />

was also done for possible collaboration.<br />

The selection of project sites/focal<br />

villages was based on <strong>the</strong> following general/<br />

indicative criteria: (a) high goat density, (b)<br />

goat production recognized as economically<br />

important, (c) accessibility, (d) high radiation<br />

effect, (e) presence of support system, among<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs. The final site selection criteria used by<br />

all implementers was decided on <strong>the</strong> project’s<br />

inception meeting-workshop.<br />

Selection of farmer-partners<br />

The farmer-partners were selected based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> following criteria:<br />

a. Willingness to participate in <strong>the</strong> project<br />

J.N. Nayga, et. al<br />

b. Smallholders with at least 5-doe level<br />

goats per family<br />

c. Positive receptivity to innovative<br />

technologies/development projects<br />

d. Have some knowledge and<br />

understanding of feeds, animal<br />

performance, production/management<br />

systems, e.g. deworming, housing,<br />

etc.<br />

e. Enterprising<br />

Characterization of focal sites, farm<br />

households, and selected farmer-partners<br />

Using structured questionnaires, <strong>the</strong><br />

focal sites, farm household, and selected<br />

farmer-partners were characterized. The<br />

characterization activity was conducted to:<br />

(a) generate baseline information/data for<br />

future impact assessment studies; (b) identify<br />

constraints in <strong>the</strong> system being practiced,<br />

as well as define researchable issues; and<br />

(c) provide basis in <strong>the</strong> selection of farmerpartners.<br />

The site selection focused on<br />

biophysical, socioeconomic, and institutional<br />

characteristics. The biophysical characteristics<br />

determined were climate, vegetation, soil type,<br />

topography, length of growing period, cropping<br />

pattern, among o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

The socioeconomic data ga<strong>the</strong>red were<br />

average farm size, tenure status, per capita<br />

income, average household size, average age<br />

and educational level, contribution of livestock<br />

to household income, access to market<br />

indicators, among o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

On institutional characteristics, data/<br />

information collected were on access to R&D<br />

institutions engaged in livestock R&D and R&D<br />

facilities, access to credit, farmers’ groups/<br />

cooperatives, marketing infrastructures,<br />

presence of product processing facilities,<br />

among o<strong>the</strong>rs. On <strong>the</strong> characterization of <strong>the</strong><br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!