download the full article here - EISRJC
download the full article here - EISRJC
download the full article here - EISRJC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
An inception meeting-workshop<br />
between LRD-PCARRD and <strong>the</strong> implementers<br />
were held to discuss <strong>the</strong> project’s concept,<br />
methodology, expected outputs, and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
pertinent issues. Concerns such as criteria for<br />
site and farmer selection, data to be ga<strong>the</strong>red<br />
for site characterization, data/information to be<br />
ga<strong>the</strong>red during regular monitoring activities,<br />
roles/responsibilities of project partners, etc.<br />
were discussed and firmed up.<br />
Selection of project sites<br />
Prior to project site selection, secondary<br />
data in terms of goat population and largest<br />
goat-producing municipalities in Cagayan Valley<br />
were ga<strong>the</strong>red from <strong>the</strong> Provincial Veterinary<br />
Office of <strong>the</strong> Isabela Provincial Government.<br />
On <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> secondary data,<br />
Echague and Alicia Isabela were <strong>the</strong> top two<br />
municipalities with <strong>the</strong> highest concentration<br />
of goat population. Field validation was<br />
undertaken to validate <strong>the</strong> secondary data<br />
ga<strong>the</strong>red and to determine <strong>the</strong> villages which<br />
will serve as focal and control sites. Echague<br />
Isabela was selected as <strong>the</strong> project focal sites<br />
while, Alicia Isabela was identified to serve as<br />
<strong>the</strong> control site. Meeting with <strong>the</strong> officers of<br />
Echague Goat Raisers/Producers Association<br />
was also done for possible collaboration.<br />
The selection of project sites/focal<br />
villages was based on <strong>the</strong> following general/<br />
indicative criteria: (a) high goat density, (b)<br />
goat production recognized as economically<br />
important, (c) accessibility, (d) high radiation<br />
effect, (e) presence of support system, among<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs. The final site selection criteria used by<br />
all implementers was decided on <strong>the</strong> project’s<br />
inception meeting-workshop.<br />
Selection of farmer-partners<br />
The farmer-partners were selected based on<br />
<strong>the</strong> following criteria:<br />
a. Willingness to participate in <strong>the</strong> project<br />
J.N. Nayga, et. al<br />
b. Smallholders with at least 5-doe level<br />
goats per family<br />
c. Positive receptivity to innovative<br />
technologies/development projects<br />
d. Have some knowledge and<br />
understanding of feeds, animal<br />
performance, production/management<br />
systems, e.g. deworming, housing,<br />
etc.<br />
e. Enterprising<br />
Characterization of focal sites, farm<br />
households, and selected farmer-partners<br />
Using structured questionnaires, <strong>the</strong><br />
focal sites, farm household, and selected<br />
farmer-partners were characterized. The<br />
characterization activity was conducted to:<br />
(a) generate baseline information/data for<br />
future impact assessment studies; (b) identify<br />
constraints in <strong>the</strong> system being practiced,<br />
as well as define researchable issues; and<br />
(c) provide basis in <strong>the</strong> selection of farmerpartners.<br />
The site selection focused on<br />
biophysical, socioeconomic, and institutional<br />
characteristics. The biophysical characteristics<br />
determined were climate, vegetation, soil type,<br />
topography, length of growing period, cropping<br />
pattern, among o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />
The socioeconomic data ga<strong>the</strong>red were<br />
average farm size, tenure status, per capita<br />
income, average household size, average age<br />
and educational level, contribution of livestock<br />
to household income, access to market<br />
indicators, among o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />
On institutional characteristics, data/<br />
information collected were on access to R&D<br />
institutions engaged in livestock R&D and R&D<br />
facilities, access to credit, farmers’ groups/<br />
cooperatives, marketing infrastructures,<br />
presence of product processing facilities,<br />
among o<strong>the</strong>rs. On <strong>the</strong> characterization of <strong>the</strong><br />
45