14.11.2014 Views

NHMRC Glaucoma Guidelines - ANZGIG

NHMRC Glaucoma Guidelines - ANZGIG

NHMRC Glaucoma Guidelines - ANZGIG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>NHMRC</strong> GUIDELINES FOR THE SCREENING, PROGNOSIS, DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION OF GLAUCOMA<br />

Chapter 8 – Monitoring: long-term care<br />

• the patient is intolerant of the prescribed medical regimen<br />

• the patient does not adhere to the prescribed medical regimen<br />

• contraindications to individual medicines develop, and/or<br />

• stable optic nerve status and low IOP occurs for a prolonged period in a patient on pressurelowering<br />

medications. Under these circumstances, a carefully monitored attempt to reduce the<br />

medical regimen may be appropriate (AOA 2002).<br />

Downward adjustment of target pressure should be made in the event of progressive optic disc<br />

or VF change. Upward adjustment of target pressure should be considered if the patient has been<br />

stable, and/or if the patient either requires less medication because of side effects, or personal<br />

choice. Whenever regimen changes are implemented, a follow-up visit is indicated within two to<br />

eight weeks to assess the response, as well as side effects from washout of the old medication,<br />

and onset of maximum effect of the new medication (AAO 2005c).<br />

Monitoring recommendations in specific populations<br />

Patients with ocular hypertension or suspected glaucoma<br />

A number of systematic reviews have discussed the importance in the reduction of IOP in patients<br />

with OH to slow the progression to glaucoma (Collaborative Normal-Tension <strong>Glaucoma</strong> Study<br />

[CNTGS] 1998; Kass, Huerer, Higginbotham et al 2002). The purpose of the follow-up examination<br />

is to periodically evaluate the status of the patient’s IOP, VF, appearance of optic disc and retinal<br />

nerve fibre layer, and to determine if there is evidence of development of glaucomatous damage<br />

(AOA 2005a). These guidelines report consensus of the Working Committee in the absence of<br />

conclusive scientific evidence. The interaction between person and disease is unique for every<br />

patient, and thus management should be individualised. The importance of assessing risk factors<br />

has been previously identified, therefore the recommendations are provided according to risk,<br />

current intervention (if any) and success of achieving target IOP under active management.<br />

Table 8.2 summarises monitoring recommendations for patients with suspected glaucoma.<br />

Any patient who shows evidence of optic nerve deterioration based on optic nerve head appearance,<br />

increased optic disc cupping with rim loss, retinal nerve fibre layer loss, or VF changes consistent<br />

with glaucomatous damage, should be diagnosed as having developed OAG, and treated and<br />

monitored as described for established OAG.<br />

Point of note<br />

Clinical judgement on a case-by-case basis is essential.<br />

For newly diagnosed patients with glaucoma, and those who have undergone significant changes in<br />

treatment, assess the visual field two to three times per year, in the first two years, and then one to<br />

two times per year thereafter depending upon other risks, signs and symptoms.<br />

Image the optic nerve every one to two years in glaucoma suspects and annually in glaucoma<br />

patients. A significant exception is for patients with substantial glaucomatous optic disc damage,<br />

with little remaining nerve tissue, and vertical cup:disc ratios (0.9 – 1.0). In these cases optic nerve<br />

imaging has little chance of detecting change in the remaining few fibres; there may not be a need<br />

to image at all.<br />

Many field abnormalities on initial testing may not reproduce on subsequent tests.<br />

There are a number of techniques which can be used to assess the visual field.<br />

National Health and Medical Research Council 99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!