14.11.2014 Views

NHMRC Glaucoma Guidelines - ANZGIG

NHMRC Glaucoma Guidelines - ANZGIG

NHMRC Glaucoma Guidelines - ANZGIG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>NHMRC</strong> GUIDELINES FOR THE SCREENING, PROGNOSIS, DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION OF GLAUCOMA<br />

Chapter 3 – Implementation strategies<br />

■ Chapter 3<br />

Implementation strategies<br />

Introduction<br />

Guideline implementation has been increasingly recognised over the past few years as a research<br />

area in its own right. Implementation strategies should reflect the purpose of the guideline, the end<br />

users, the benefit that is anticipated from application of the guideline, barriers to guideline uptake<br />

and incentives that could improve compliance with guideline recommendations (Barosi 2006).<br />

The way in which a guideline is constructed, worded and organised makes a difference to its<br />

uptake. <strong>Guidelines</strong> with visual components are more readily implemented than written guidelines<br />

(Prior, Guerin & Grimmer-Somers 2008).<br />

Health care providers’ readiness to adopt guideline recommendations reflects their capacity and<br />

willingness to reflect on, and change their behaviours. This assumes that they know what they need<br />

to know, are able to measure their performance, embrace new concepts, and reflect on changes to<br />

their practice in terms of improved patient health outcomes, and/or more cost effective practices.<br />

Guideline implementation and evaluation of guideline effectiveness often involves iterative<br />

and interlinked qualitative and quantitative research designs. These are needed to tease out<br />

the complexities of the current best evidence versus current clinical practice, behaviour change<br />

and intention to change, barriers to change, incentives required for change and maintenance of<br />

changed behaviours. The novelty of guideline implementation research supports the lack of clear<br />

evidence for any fool-proof strategy of comprehensively putting a guideline in place.<br />

A recent synthesis of systematic reviews identified the effectiveness of a range of published<br />

strategies used to imp lement guidelines (Prior et al 2008). This review highlighted that<br />

multipronged implementation strategies are required for greatest effectiveness in guideline uptake.<br />

Effective strategies are:<br />

• Educational; such as continuing medical education, educational meetings and interactive<br />

educational sessions (either face to face, using multimedia or the internet) and educational<br />

outreach (academic detailing) that typically consist of practice visits by educators, audit,<br />

feedback and peer review.<br />

• Long-term; reminders, decision support systems and local opinion leaders maintain health<br />

care provider interest after a guideline has been implemented.<br />

• Patient centric; patient-specific interventions designed to influence health care provider<br />

behaviour via information provided to patients, although the best way to influence patients<br />

directly is yet to be determined.<br />

Specific interventions may be more effective for health care providers at different stages of<br />

behaviour change (Procheska, DiClemente & Narcross 1992a; Procheska, Narcross, Fowler et al<br />

1992b) particularly when introducing guideline-based recommendations which require radical<br />

changes in practice behaviours (Michie, Johnston & Araham 2005).<br />

National Health and Medical Research Council 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!