14.11.2014 Views

NHMRC Glaucoma Guidelines - ANZGIG

NHMRC Glaucoma Guidelines - ANZGIG

NHMRC Glaucoma Guidelines - ANZGIG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>NHMRC</strong> GUIDELINES FOR THE SCREENING, PROGNOSIS, DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION OF GLAUCOMA<br />

Chapter 10 – Laser therapy and surgery<br />

Evidence Statement<br />

Evidence supports using intra-operative and post-operative anti-fibrotics to reduce the risk of failure for<br />

patients undergoing incisional surgery.<br />

<strong>Glaucoma</strong> drainage devices<br />

There is no evidence to support the clinical superiority of one aqueous shunt over another<br />

regarding safety or efficacy in reducing IOP. Ophthalmologists should thus base their choice<br />

of device on their own experience, and continue to utilise the shunt with which they are most<br />

comfortable. Tube surgery produces significant long-term IOP control with results suggesting that<br />

IOP control lasts longer than with trabeculectomy (Molteno comparison). Tube surgery tends to<br />

be limited to eyes at higher risk of failure with trabeculectomy or those in which trabeculectomy<br />

has failed. Tube surgery should be considered for the primary procedure in cases of Iridocorneal<br />

Endothelial syndrome, various forms of uveitic (inflammatory) glaucoma, aphakic glaucoma and<br />

in patients whom trabeculectomy is likely to fail (Doe, Budenz, Gedde et al 2001). Such situations<br />

include some severely traumatised eyes and secondary paediatric glaucomas (Molteno et al 2001).<br />

To date there have been no randomised studies which directly compare tube surgery<br />

and trabeculectomy.<br />

Evidence Statements<br />

• Evidence strongly supports using tube surgery for long-term intraocular pressure control. This is an<br />

appropriate first-choice surgery in patients:<br />

−−with eyes at higher risk of failure from trabeculectomy<br />

−−who have failed trabeculectomy<br />

−−with Iridocorneal Endothelial syndrome<br />

−−with various forms of uveitic (inflammatory) glaucoma, or<br />

• with aphakic glaucoma.<br />

Cataract surgery<br />

Results for cataract surgery in glaucoma have been variable and largely dependent on the outcome<br />

measure used. Friedman, Jampel, Lubornski et al (2002) report good evidence that long-term IOP<br />

control is greater with combined procedures than with cataract extraction alone. They report fair<br />

to moderate evidence that trabeculectomy alone lowers long-term IOP more than combined<br />

extra-capsular cataract extraction and trabeculectomy. Friedman and Vedula (2006) indicated that<br />

there was no evidence of benefit with lens extraction in terms of progression of VF loss, visual<br />

acuity or medication use. It was noted that the studies had significant limitations that affected<br />

the ability to draw conclusions, for instance small sample sizes and unit analysis error (where<br />

both eyes were used in some patients). In eyes previously damaged by creeping angle closure,<br />

goniosynechiolysis and trabeculotomy are combined with cataract extraction (plus intraocular<br />

lenses implantation). This works well to reduce IOP and prevent synechasie reformation<br />

(Japanese <strong>Glaucoma</strong> Society [JGS] 2004). Trabeculectomy accelerates the development of cataracts<br />

(AGIS 2000) and promotes tendencies for angle closure due to ciliary block or lens/anterior<br />

segment disproportion. The latter occurs when the increase in lens size from ageing or cataract<br />

leads to crowding and displacement of the ciliary processes and iris, exacerbating plateau iris, iris<br />

to angle proximity and ciliary block, even in the presence of iridotomy. In subjects with persistent<br />

angle narrowing after iridotomy and/or iridoplasty, careful consideration is required regarding the<br />

National Health and Medical Research Council 151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!