14.11.2014 Views

NHMRC Glaucoma Guidelines - ANZGIG

NHMRC Glaucoma Guidelines - ANZGIG

NHMRC Glaucoma Guidelines - ANZGIG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>NHMRC</strong> GUIDELINES FOR THE SCREENING, PROGNOSIS, DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION OF GLAUCOMA<br />

Chapter 6 – Identifying those at risk of developing glaucoma<br />

Risk factors identified from patient history<br />

Age<br />

Advancing age is a major risk factor for the development of glaucoma. The prevalence of glaucoma<br />

is four to 10 times higher in the older age groups than in individuals in their forties (American<br />

Optometric Association [AOA] 2002). In the Australian Melbourne Visual Impairment Project, this<br />

difference was substantially larger. It was 17 times more likely that participants aged 80 years and<br />

older would have glaucoma, than participants aged less than 50 years (Weih, Manjan, McCarty et<br />

al 2001). Pooled data reported by Burr, Mowatt, Hernandez et al (2007) indicate that the overall<br />

prevalence of open angle glaucoma (OAG) was 0.3% (95% CI 0.1% to 0.5%) in people aged<br />

40 years, and increased to 3.3% (95% CI 2.5% to 4.0%) in people aged 70 years. Damage to the<br />

optic nerve from glaucoma is uncommon before the age of 50 years in Caucasians, however it<br />

appears to occur at least a decade earlier in people of African descent (AOA 2002).<br />

Evidence Statements<br />

• Evidence strongly indicates that Caucasians over the age of 50 years undertake regular ocular health checks.<br />

• Evidence indicates that individuals of African descent over the age of 40 years undertake regular ocular<br />

health checks.<br />

Point of note<br />

Caucasians over 50 years of age are at moderate risk, and those over 80 years of age are at high<br />

risk of developing glaucoma. A rational approach to screening for glaucoma is therefore required<br />

for Caucasians over the age of 50 years. For Caucasians without other significant risk factors<br />

for glaucoma, a glaucoma assessment could be included in the 45-49 year general health check<br />

(Medicare Item Number 717) and also in the Health Assessment for people aged 75 and over<br />

(Medicare Item Number 700 or 702) undertaken by general medical practitioners.<br />

Family history and genetics<br />

A family history of glaucoma puts an individual at greater risk of developing the disease (AOA 2002).<br />

In close relatives of individuals with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), the prevalence is three<br />

to six times that of the general population. The incidence of the disease in first-degree relatives is<br />

three to five times that found in the general population. The 22% lifetime risk for glaucoma found in<br />

relatives of patients with glaucoma is almost 10 times that of controls (AOA 2002).<br />

Burr et al (2007) conducted a meta-analysis of four studies that indicated an association between<br />

developing OAG and a positive family history, with the strongest association being observed<br />

between siblings. However, Burr et al (2007) expressed reservations about this association, noting<br />

that most of the studies relied on the verbal reporting of family history of glaucoma rather than<br />

clinical examination. Thus the results may be open to misclassification.<br />

Mutations in transcription factor genes have been found to be responsible for developmental<br />

disorders associated with childhood glaucoma (AOA 2002). The following genetic syndromes have<br />

high associations with childhood glaucoma: Nail Patella Syndrome with the LMX1B gene, Axenfeld<br />

Rieger Syndrome/Anterior segment dysgenesis with the PITX2 and FOXC1 genes and Aniridia<br />

with the PAX6 gene. Patients with these syndromes or mutations are usually followed closely for<br />

glaucoma (Mackey & Craig 2003). Congenital glaucoma is associated with Cyp1B1 mutations in<br />

50 National Health and Medical Research Council

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!