schedule of planning applications

More documents

Recommendations

Info

designated Special Conservation Area and will result in a significant loss of trees and bushes. Our rooms and bedrooms will overlook industrial huts with night illuminations, as will other residents in New Road and Chander Close, not pleasant greenery. F. The local infrastructure is not adequate to serve this proposed industry. The sewage and water pipes are very old and we already have to deal with blocked drains every 6 months or so. The ground between 321 New Road and 319 New Road regularly floods. Foul waste water and hazardous materials could further contaminate the ground. This will have an economic impact, as well as an environmental health impact. G. Furthermore ref the infrastructure, there will be traffic problems in both roads, such as access, safety issues, and extra traffic generation such as delivery lorries, waste lorries etc, causing more traffic jams up to Penny's Hill crossroads. H. The proposal provides insufficient parking spaces as there are already 4 vehicles, including a large refrigerated van for West Country Catering in the front of the property. Presumably these 4 vehicles may end up being parked in Chander Close. 3. Approval would create a precedent, meaning that it would be difficult to object to similar proposals in the residential areas of Ferndown. 4. The cumulative impact of the development when considered alongside all the other homes in this residential area will have hugely adverse implications for the whole area, as well as for the peace and health of everyone living here. W G & M F Price 430 New Road, Ferndown Mrs Daphne Phillips 432 New Road, Ferndown Object We live opposite, in an area of special character, a very pleasant residential road. The introduction of more deliveries on an already busy road would mean more noise and congestion. The proposed introduction of such a large number of animals could lead to nauseous smells wafted towards our property. I objected to the first proposal and am objecting to this proposal also. It is not a suitable position for a cattery to be sited and will blight the surrounding houses and cause more traffic problems along the road, which already has a regular build up on approaching the traffic lights. There have been many objections to this, and it has not been approved by the Parish Council. I sincerely hope you will not approve it, and take into account the 12
many objections you have received.I wish to object to the plan. New Road is residential, in the main and to add a cattery is not in keeping with the area. There will be more traffic on an already busy road. The construction of 22 units will be very disruptive to the residents, and once up and running it will cause a lot of problems, with extra refuse to be dealt with and the general upkeep of the units. Mr Roy Pulling 325 New Road, Ferndown Mr James Farrant 311 New Road, Ferndown Mr Wayne Barraball 43 Braemar Avenue, Hengistbury Head I am writing to reiterate my objections submitted when the first application was sent in. Although a fresh application has been submitted this in no way invalidates my original objections.I consider this proposal to be totally unsuitable for a close knit residential area and particularly bordering on a narrow service road which Chandler Close is. Chandler Close is totally unsuitable for commercial traffic such as delivery lorries and customers delivering and collecting cats for boarding. The road was never intended for such traffic which would be a hazard and nuisance to the residents affected. I strongly object to the application to create a cattery at 321 New Road. This is a residential area of special character and should be cherished and preserved as such. This proposal is totally out of keeping and utterly inappropriate. Many other neighbours have objected eloquently and I would simply like to reiterate the unacceptable traffic, noise, smell and potential health hazards this development would create. The plots in New Road and Chander Close were designed for spacious residential dwellings and should be protected by the Council for residential use only. I would like to confirm that I still strongly object to this planning application for the same reasons as previously stated. The well expressed views of the surrounding neighbours should be respected by the Planning Officer and the special character of this residential neighbourhood should be preserved by refusing permission for this commercial use. Additional Objection on behalf of neighbouring residents. Summary of letter received 5.4.13. Full letter on file. I still have serious concerns over the handling of this application and the information supplied; the neighbours have requested that I submit these to you. A number of the questions on the application form have not been filled in accurately and could have been identified by the case officer after a site visit e.g. the tree question. I believe that the application should 13
Page 1 and 2: Everyone 7 128 2346 rep_agd_ID Draf
Page 3 and 4: The development hereby permitted sh
Page 5 and 6: gives no details of the disposal of
Page 7 and 8: cannot turn in the turning space. R
Page 9 and 10: and service vehicles within the pro
Page 11: property. I presume that the applic
Page 15 and 16: when compared to personal knowledge
Page 17 and 18: note that my previous comments stil
Page 19 and 20: structures more visible from the ro
Page 21 and 22: Un-neighbourly form of development,
Page 23 and 24: garage/building extension. So we ca
Page 25 and 26: The cattery will be open for visito
Page 27 and 28: The Council’s Public Health Offic
Page 29 and 30: 1:500 Site Plan received 15.1.2013
Page 31 and 32: Reason: To prevent disturbance to t
Page 33 and 34: Notwithstanding details already sub
Page 35 and 36: http://www.environmentagency.gov.uk
Page 37 and 38: Road to the north east of Hinton Pa
Page 39 and 40: This view was taken for the scheme
Page 41 and 42: Impact on biodiversity A bat and bi
Page 43 and 44: 4 The development hereby approved s
Page 45 and 46: - Waste must remain in digester for
Page 47 and 48: Consultee Responses: County Highway
Page 49 and 50: The agent has also clarified that w
Page 51 and 52: This can be achieved by the landsca
Page 53 and 54: Corfe Mullen Parish Council Comment
Page 55 and 56: have the potential to affect specie
Page 57 and 58: Mr & Mrs M J Wigmore 19 Highmoor Ro
Page 59 and 60: Impact on the character and appeara
Page 61 and 62: 2 The development hereby permitted
Page 63 and 64:
Informatives: 1 Regard was had to t
Page 65 and 66:
However, after discussions with the
Page 67 and 68:
Site Description 31 Golf Links Road
Page 69 and 70:
Reason: To ensure that trees and th
Page 71 and 72:
use of our own garden. 8. Finally,
Page 73 and 74:
Residential area Hillside Road is a
Page 75 and 76:
disturbance. The use has been opera
Page 77 and 78:
Item Number: 7. Ref: 3/13/0190/HOU
Page 79 and 80:
Item Number: 8. Ref: 3/13/0209/FUL
Page 81 and 82:
extremely dangerous location at the
Page 83 and 84:
allow vehicles exiting from Lingmel
Page 85 and 86:
applications on the telegraph pole
Page 87 and 88:
arely 3 metres. Leigh Lane is very
Page 89 and 90:
access onto the carriageway when ta
Page 91 and 92:
Is there any reason why the drive c
Page 93 and 94:
Strategy, paragraphs 58 - 61 of the
Page 95 and 96:
contractors arrangements such as co
Page 97 and 98:
A PD maximum ridge height of 4m wit
Page 99 and 100:
Notwithstanding the proximity to th
Page 101 and 102:
Item Number: 10. Ref: 3/13/0276/HOU
Page 103 and 104:
2 The development hereby permitted
Page 105 and 106:
This proposal is for alterations an
Page 107 and 108:
3 The applicant(s) is (are) advised
Page 109 and 110:
the changes in order that the resta
Page 111 and 112:
• The premises were open beyond t
Page 113 and 114:
Conditions/Reasons:- 1 No amplified
Page 115:
accordance with the provisions of t
show all

schedule of planning applications

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?