schedule of planning applications
schedule of planning applications
schedule of planning applications
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
However, after discussions with the owner/developer<br />
we do not feel that he intends to amend the height <strong>of</strong><br />
the partly constructed building at the back <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property and abutting our boundary.<br />
When I suggested that a proposal is accepted or<br />
refused by EDDC he did not appear to consider the<br />
point.<br />
What concerns us is that if he carries on and finishes<br />
the addition as it is, it could be years, if at all, he is<br />
made to comply and reduce the height.<br />
Further comments received 2.4.13:<br />
We are finding the above <strong>applications</strong> very confusing<br />
due to the fact that:<br />
1. The owner/developer constructed the single storey<br />
extension above the rear <strong>of</strong> the garage to a height <strong>of</strong><br />
4m plus, under what he thought was permitted<br />
development. Your website advice allows 3.5m as it is<br />
only 1.2m from his boundary and ours.<br />
2. Since then he has made several <strong>applications</strong> to<br />
you, the latest <strong>of</strong> which shows the height to be 2.5m,<br />
which is now displayed on your website.<br />
We also note that the front upstairs is being turned<br />
into a bay window which will look straight into our<br />
bedroom's French windows giving no privacy within<br />
the room.<br />
Further comments received 9.4.13:<br />
Further to our last letter, the construction which has<br />
now been built without the benefit <strong>of</strong> any <strong>planning</strong><br />
permission to date, is totally unacceptable and has<br />
come to overwhelm our garden and property.<br />
The structure <strong>of</strong> the whole, 4ft from our boundary has<br />
become over development on a large scale and, apart<br />
from anything else, is bound to create a drainage<br />
problem on our land and it is impossible to screen<br />
such a mass.<br />
We feel it essential that the project goes before Parish<br />
and District Committees, which would give us an<br />
opportunity to be represented.<br />
We do feel that there should be a duty <strong>of</strong> care towards<br />
our existing property as well as to the applicants.<br />
Further letter received 18.4.13:<br />
I find it quite difficult how this matter can still be a<br />
Proposal, when we have already been over powered<br />
by the size and shape <strong>of</strong> the edifice for months, and<br />
the construction we have witnessed bears little<br />
relationship to any <strong>of</strong> the drawings we have seen to<br />
date.<br />
However, in reply to your letter <strong>of</strong> 11.4.13, our<br />
65
Change language