schedule of planning applications

More documents

Recommendations

Info

now have a block of flats We most strongly object because of the smell and noise. J M & C Kelly 28 Chander Close, Ferndown Object Major reasons why we think planning should be denied are: 1. The property would then have dual residential and commercial business use. It would appear this could allow future use of the premises to be used for a full commercial business in a residential area. They are already running a catering business from 321 New Road with facilities located at that address. Surely this is an Environmental Health issue. This would affect the New Road residential status and more critically Chander Close which is quiet residential backwater. 2. We feel that a cattery location is more suited to a rural area away from peoples' homes which would be affected by an increase in traffic: a) Initial building work. The turning area in Chander Close was affected by parked cars and lorries for almost 12 months while alterations were made to the applicant's house. They were using the back entrance into the garden and the road was constantly blocked. We are concerned that in future they will try to make this a vehicle entrance as they have erected double gates which have been given prominence on the plans. b) The cages appear to be open and will no doubt raise smell and noise considerations and also attract other cats and we already have foxes in the area. c) It is also noted that fluorescent illumination is to be installed for all night lighting which would affect close neighbours. 3. Access to the Cattery is stated to be off New Road which is also the access for their catering business. We do not understand what it means by application for three new parking spaces. They already have four vehicles parked in their drive - a large refrigerated van, a Freelander, a Peugeot and a Mini. Are these four vehicles staying in their drive and three additional spaces being catered for in their front garden? With the Cattery so near to Chander Close we feel that they will use this back garden gate as an access. This access is used at present for the delivery of large Calor Gas cylinders which are used for their catering business. Their garage is full of refrigerators and other equipment used in connection with their refrigerated van and their catering business, which appears to be run from residential only premises. 4. Chander Close is very narrow and large lorries 6
cannot turn in the turning space. Rubbish disposal lorries have to back up the road to enable them to drive out again. 5. Finally, although your notes state that statements of loss of value of property should be avoided this is very difficult to ignore. We would not have bought this property two years ago and spent savings on renovating it if there had been an existing Cattery there, so it does beg the question - will anybody else? Further comments received 26.3.13 Our additional concerns are as follows: 1. The majority of the proposed structure, some 7 units of the cattery back on to Chander Close with 8 more in close proximity. This will be directly opposite and some 25 metres from our front lounge window. We have studied the plans and find them to be a confusing mixture of yards, feet and metres and some not to scale. By measurement of the plans over 50% of the structure is nearer to our home than their own house. I would estimate by some 8 metres. The neighbours on either side of us, 30 and 26, are in a similar situation. Additionally, the neighbours adjacent to the applicant's house look to be in a similar situation, if not worse. 2. The height of the structures indicated on the plans is also confusing. With the addition of foundations and flooring we are looking at more than 2 metres high, well above the rear fencing. The existing blue painted hut is at least 1 metre above the rear fence at present (personally measured) colour-wise it will not blend with the proposed appearance of the installation. 3. Presently there are trees/shrubs creating partial screening. It would be surprising if these were not removed during a construction phase. Would these be replaced by trees/shrubs of a similar height? 4. I have also had the opportunity to view the rear garden from one of their direct neighbours and can only express my horror at the size of the structure taking up some 50% of the applicant's residential garden. 5. Comments by the applicant state that the Chander Close gates will not be used for a cattery. We trust this will include the construction stage if agreed. Use by the catering business should also be prevented as this entrance has been extensively used in the past during house reconstruction. 6. No mention of washing up facilities for the cattery. Will this be done in the same kitchen as is used in the preparation of food for the catering business. 7. Significantly, the question of the accumulation of 7
Page 1 and 2: Everyone 7 128 2346 rep_agd_ID Draf
Page 3 and 4: The development hereby permitted sh
Page 5: gives no details of the disposal of
Page 9 and 10: and service vehicles within the pro
Page 11 and 12: property. I presume that the applic
Page 13 and 14: many objections you have received.I
Page 15 and 16: when compared to personal knowledge
Page 17 and 18: note that my previous comments stil
Page 19 and 20: structures more visible from the ro
Page 21 and 22: Un-neighbourly form of development,
Page 23 and 24: garage/building extension. So we ca
Page 25 and 26: The cattery will be open for visito
Page 27 and 28: The Council’s Public Health Offic
Page 29 and 30: 1:500 Site Plan received 15.1.2013
Page 31 and 32: Reason: To prevent disturbance to t
Page 33 and 34: Notwithstanding details already sub
Page 35 and 36: http://www.environmentagency.gov.uk
Page 37 and 38: Road to the north east of Hinton Pa
Page 39 and 40: This view was taken for the scheme
Page 41 and 42: Impact on biodiversity A bat and bi
Page 43 and 44: 4 The development hereby approved s
Page 45 and 46: - Waste must remain in digester for
Page 47 and 48: Consultee Responses: County Highway
Page 49 and 50: The agent has also clarified that w
Page 51 and 52: This can be achieved by the landsca
Page 53 and 54: Corfe Mullen Parish Council Comment
Page 55 and 56: have the potential to affect specie
Page 57 and 58:
Mr & Mrs M J Wigmore 19 Highmoor Ro
Page 59 and 60:
Impact on the character and appeara
Page 61 and 62:
2 The development hereby permitted
Page 63 and 64:
Informatives: 1 Regard was had to t
Page 65 and 66:
However, after discussions with the
Page 67 and 68:
Site Description 31 Golf Links Road
Page 69 and 70:
Reason: To ensure that trees and th
Page 71 and 72:
use of our own garden. 8. Finally,
Page 73 and 74:
Residential area Hillside Road is a
Page 75 and 76:
disturbance. The use has been opera
Page 77 and 78:
Item Number: 7. Ref: 3/13/0190/HOU
Page 79 and 80:
Item Number: 8. Ref: 3/13/0209/FUL
Page 81 and 82:
extremely dangerous location at the
Page 83 and 84:
allow vehicles exiting from Lingmel
Page 85 and 86:
applications on the telegraph pole
Page 87 and 88:
arely 3 metres. Leigh Lane is very
Page 89 and 90:
access onto the carriageway when ta
Page 91 and 92:
Is there any reason why the drive c
Page 93 and 94:
Strategy, paragraphs 58 - 61 of the
Page 95 and 96:
contractors arrangements such as co
Page 97 and 98:
A PD maximum ridge height of 4m wit
Page 99 and 100:
Notwithstanding the proximity to th
Page 101 and 102:
Item Number: 10. Ref: 3/13/0276/HOU
Page 103 and 104:
2 The development hereby permitted
Page 105 and 106:
This proposal is for alterations an
Page 107 and 108:
3 The applicant(s) is (are) advised
Page 109 and 110:
the changes in order that the resta
Page 111 and 112:
• The premises were open beyond t
Page 113 and 114:
Conditions/Reasons:- 1 No amplified
Page 115:
accordance with the provisions of t
show all

schedule of planning applications

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?