19.11.2014 Views

schedule of planning applications

schedule of planning applications

schedule of planning applications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The property had <strong>planning</strong> permission granted in 1975 for using part <strong>of</strong> it for a<br />

business, but this was temporary and expired in 1976.<br />

The applicant has stated that the driveway at the site can accommodate space to<br />

park at least six vehicles and as there will only be 1 client on the premises at any one<br />

time. The catering business has one small van. Based on this information it appears<br />

that this use would not require <strong>planning</strong> permission due to its low-key nature.<br />

The main issues are the impact <strong>of</strong> the proposal on the SCA, the amenities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

occupants <strong>of</strong> adjacent dwellings, and highway safety.<br />

Impact on the SCA<br />

Low-level timber buildings are proposed that would be sited behind the house and<br />

these would not be visible from New Rd. Three additional parking spaces are shown<br />

at the front, and these would be screened to a large extent by the existing conifer<br />

trees along the site’s boundary with New Road.<br />

Given the position <strong>of</strong> the new units and building behind the dwelling, no adverse<br />

impact is expected for the street scene <strong>of</strong> New Road. The low-level nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

buildings and small size will make them appears as subservient outbuildings which<br />

would not be easily open to public views.<br />

The buildings would be seen from the upper windows <strong>of</strong> adjacent properties, but this<br />

would not result in a visual impact that can be afforded significant weight in the<br />

<strong>planning</strong> assessment.<br />

It is concluded that no adverse impact on the street scene or SCA is likely to occur,<br />

and therefore the proposal accords with Policies DES8 and BUCON6 <strong>of</strong> the EDLP,<br />

as well as policy HE2 <strong>of</strong> the CS.<br />

Impact on the amenities <strong>of</strong> the occupants <strong>of</strong> adjacent dwellings<br />

Although the new buildings would be screened to a degree by the existing site<br />

boundary treatment, this would not <strong>of</strong>fer complete screening, and the buildings would<br />

be apparent above the hedge on the boundary with 319 New Rd. However, their<br />

small scale would not allow a significant impact on the amenity <strong>of</strong> the occupants <strong>of</strong><br />

319 or 323 New Rd or the properties at Chander Close.<br />

The operation <strong>of</strong> the new cattery would result in additional vehicle movements to the<br />

site and the use <strong>of</strong> additional surface parking at the front, with access from New<br />

Road. This would bring some additional disturbance to the occupants <strong>of</strong> 319 and<br />

323 New Rd. However, given that New Road is well used by traffic, this creates a<br />

higher ambient noise level than a site removed from a main road. The additional<br />

noise generated by the additional traffic movements is not expected to add<br />

significantly to the existing background noise levels.<br />

Disturbance would also arise from customers bringing cats to the site and delivering<br />

them to the housing units, as this would involve walking next to the site’s boundary<br />

with 319 New Rd, and noise is likely from conversations and door opening/shutting<br />

close to the rear <strong>of</strong> 319.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!