01.12.2014 Views

Deliverable 3.1 Business Analysis - Green eMotion Project

Deliverable 3.1 Business Analysis - Green eMotion Project

Deliverable 3.1 Business Analysis - Green eMotion Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 Conclusion from Previous <strong>Project</strong>s and Experiences<br />

After presenting some short project summaries, a number of conclusions can be drawn. Through this,<br />

differences in the project’s main goals, as well as the project’s target groups and the used energy sources<br />

can be identified. Moreover, the demonstration dimensions are considered in more detail.<br />

In terms of the project’s main goals, G4V is the only project exclusively focusing on the effects that can<br />

occur with a mass scale EV roll out. All the remaining demonstrations aim to develop the needed<br />

infrastructure in terms of charging spots and ICT systems. Therefore, the G4V project results can be seen<br />

as prerequisites to the successful pan-European e-Mobility introduction.<br />

With regard to the demonstration’s target groups, there are differences as well: Although most<br />

demonstrations focus on the private EV use, with FutureFleet there is another project specifically<br />

focusing on the opportunities of EVs as company cars. Since <strong>Green</strong> <strong>eMotion</strong> is expected to cover both<br />

scenarios, private and company driven EV use, experiences gained through FutureFleet can be used as<br />

well.<br />

Regarding the energy sources used in demonstration projects, two different approaches can be found:<br />

While G4V and e-IKT aim to fit their charging facilities into existing grids, for instance MeRegioMobil,<br />

EDISON and FutureFleet try to only use renewable energy sources for their proposed infrastructures.<br />

Since there are essential differences in energy supplies among the participating partners and the energy<br />

grids they are working with, <strong>Green</strong> <strong>eMotion</strong> in the end should be able to support both kinds of energy<br />

supplies as well as different setups resulting from them.<br />

Another differentiation that can be conducted between the presented projects is assessing the<br />

demonstration dimensions. As it can be seen through the project descriptions, there are projects focusing<br />

on smaller groups of participants (such as MeRegioMobil, CROME, Future Fleet and EDISON at its first<br />

project phase) but as well projects considering EV mass scale introduction, as there is e-IKT, ELVIRE<br />

and again G4V. For e-Mobility partners large scale demonstrations appear to be more important since the<br />

project shall lay the cornerstone for a pan-European e-Mobility infrastructure. But nevertheless, results<br />

from smaller demonstrations should be considered carefully as well since they can provide hints on<br />

geographically specific characteristics and circumstances.<br />

Now from <strong>Green</strong> <strong>eMotion</strong>’s perspective it is important to both understand the proposed project concepts,<br />

as well as the limitations and prerequisites that come with them. In addition to that, the modifications that<br />

need to be undertaken in order to project the results from small demonstrations to large scale EV<br />

introductions is to be performed in line with <strong>Green</strong> <strong>eMotion</strong>.<br />

In order to successfully conduct this task, the following paragraph will provide the different project’s<br />

critical success factors, followed by an analysis with regard to their importance to <strong>Green</strong> <strong>eMotion</strong>.<br />

GA MOVE/FP7/265499/<strong>Green</strong> <strong>eMotion</strong> WP 3: <strong>Deliverable</strong> <strong>3.1</strong> Page 42 of 147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!