25.12.2014 Views

Prime pagine RA2010FUS:Copia di Layout 1 - ENEA - Fusione

Prime pagine RA2010FUS:Copia di Layout 1 - ENEA - Fusione

Prime pagine RA2010FUS:Copia di Layout 1 - ENEA - Fusione

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

fusion advanced stu<strong>di</strong>es torus (cont’d.)<br />

progress report<br />

2010<br />

051<br />

Pressure<br />

4.02×10 06<br />

3.77×10 06<br />

3.51×10 06<br />

3.25×10 06<br />

3.00×10 06<br />

2.74×10 06<br />

2.48×10 06<br />

2.23×10 06<br />

1.97×10 06<br />

1.72×10 06<br />

1.46×10 06<br />

Pa<br />

Figure 2.7 – Pressure in the <strong>di</strong>vertor pipes<br />

Figure 2.6 – FAST <strong>di</strong>vertor design with ~20° outward strike<br />

point angle<br />

along the dump plate and the dome, continues through<br />

the inner dump plate and vertical target and finally<br />

returns into the cassette manifold through the back of<br />

the inner vertical target. A preliminary 3D<br />

thermo–hydraulic analysis has been carried out for the<br />

<strong>di</strong>vertor module by using the ANSYS CFX fluid<br />

dynamics code. The total heat power on each in<strong>di</strong>vidual<br />

<strong>di</strong>vertor module a single module (the total power on the<br />

whole <strong>di</strong>vertor is 22.7 MW) has been splitted between<br />

the two vertical target surfaces (2/3 in the outer and 1/3<br />

in the inner vertical target) and applied as heat flow into<br />

the model. Assuming the water flowing with 10 Kgs –1<br />

rate and 4 Mpa pressure, 120°C as inlet con<strong>di</strong>tions, a<br />

2.2 MPa pressure drop (fig. 2.7) and 11°C temperature<br />

increase have been computed in a single <strong>di</strong>vertor<br />

module. The temperature <strong>di</strong>stribution along a single<br />

tiles row in the straight part of the outer vertical target<br />

has been evaluated by assuming the same inlet con<strong>di</strong>tion<br />

as before (1.67 Kg s –1 mass flow rate, 4 MPa inlet<br />

pressure, 120°C inlet temperature). The model includes<br />

the presence of the swirl tape as foreseen in the bottom<br />

part of the vertical target. It was supposed that the W<br />

monoblocks are bonded on the CuCrZr pipe by a Cu<br />

OFHC interlayer. The heat load has been assumed to<br />

vary exponentially with an energy decay length of 5 mm<br />

at the outer midplane and a factor 5 for the expansion<br />

at the target, thus resulting in ∼20 MWm –2 on the strike<br />

point. The average heat transfer coefficient at the<br />

interface between water and pipe has been computed as<br />

∼110 kW m –2 K –1 . The maximum stationary<br />

temperature reached is ∼1700°C on the W tile facing<br />

the plasma and ∼490°C on the Cu OFHC layer<br />

(fig. 2.8).<br />

Temperature<br />

1.7×10 03<br />

1.6×10 03<br />

1.4×10 03<br />

1.3×10 03<br />

1.1×10 03<br />

9.3×10 02<br />

7.7×10 02<br />

6.1×10 02<br />

4.4×10 02<br />

2.8×10 02<br />

1.2×10 02<br />

[C]<br />

Figure 2.8 – Temperature contour on the <strong>di</strong>vertor outer<br />

vertical target<br />

Figure 2.9 – FW and <strong>di</strong>vertor in the FAST CATIA5<br />

model<br />

First wall design<br />

The first wall design advanced in the last year, based<br />

upon a solution consisting in a bundle (fig. 2.9) of<br />

poloidal coaxial pipes (fig. 2.10) armoured with 4 mm<br />

thick plasma-sprayed W [2.10]. This configuration<br />

Figure 2.10 – Section of the FW model showing the<br />

poloidal coaxial pipes bundle

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!