Prime pagine RA2010FUS:Copia di Layout 1 - ENEA - Fusione
Prime pagine RA2010FUS:Copia di Layout 1 - ENEA - Fusione
Prime pagine RA2010FUS:Copia di Layout 1 - ENEA - Fusione
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
fusion advanced stu<strong>di</strong>es torus (cont’d.)<br />
progress report<br />
2010<br />
051<br />
Pressure<br />
4.02×10 06<br />
3.77×10 06<br />
3.51×10 06<br />
3.25×10 06<br />
3.00×10 06<br />
2.74×10 06<br />
2.48×10 06<br />
2.23×10 06<br />
1.97×10 06<br />
1.72×10 06<br />
1.46×10 06<br />
Pa<br />
Figure 2.7 – Pressure in the <strong>di</strong>vertor pipes<br />
Figure 2.6 – FAST <strong>di</strong>vertor design with ~20° outward strike<br />
point angle<br />
along the dump plate and the dome, continues through<br />
the inner dump plate and vertical target and finally<br />
returns into the cassette manifold through the back of<br />
the inner vertical target. A preliminary 3D<br />
thermo–hydraulic analysis has been carried out for the<br />
<strong>di</strong>vertor module by using the ANSYS CFX fluid<br />
dynamics code. The total heat power on each in<strong>di</strong>vidual<br />
<strong>di</strong>vertor module a single module (the total power on the<br />
whole <strong>di</strong>vertor is 22.7 MW) has been splitted between<br />
the two vertical target surfaces (2/3 in the outer and 1/3<br />
in the inner vertical target) and applied as heat flow into<br />
the model. Assuming the water flowing with 10 Kgs –1<br />
rate and 4 Mpa pressure, 120°C as inlet con<strong>di</strong>tions, a<br />
2.2 MPa pressure drop (fig. 2.7) and 11°C temperature<br />
increase have been computed in a single <strong>di</strong>vertor<br />
module. The temperature <strong>di</strong>stribution along a single<br />
tiles row in the straight part of the outer vertical target<br />
has been evaluated by assuming the same inlet con<strong>di</strong>tion<br />
as before (1.67 Kg s –1 mass flow rate, 4 MPa inlet<br />
pressure, 120°C inlet temperature). The model includes<br />
the presence of the swirl tape as foreseen in the bottom<br />
part of the vertical target. It was supposed that the W<br />
monoblocks are bonded on the CuCrZr pipe by a Cu<br />
OFHC interlayer. The heat load has been assumed to<br />
vary exponentially with an energy decay length of 5 mm<br />
at the outer midplane and a factor 5 for the expansion<br />
at the target, thus resulting in ∼20 MWm –2 on the strike<br />
point. The average heat transfer coefficient at the<br />
interface between water and pipe has been computed as<br />
∼110 kW m –2 K –1 . The maximum stationary<br />
temperature reached is ∼1700°C on the W tile facing<br />
the plasma and ∼490°C on the Cu OFHC layer<br />
(fig. 2.8).<br />
Temperature<br />
1.7×10 03<br />
1.6×10 03<br />
1.4×10 03<br />
1.3×10 03<br />
1.1×10 03<br />
9.3×10 02<br />
7.7×10 02<br />
6.1×10 02<br />
4.4×10 02<br />
2.8×10 02<br />
1.2×10 02<br />
[C]<br />
Figure 2.8 – Temperature contour on the <strong>di</strong>vertor outer<br />
vertical target<br />
Figure 2.9 – FW and <strong>di</strong>vertor in the FAST CATIA5<br />
model<br />
First wall design<br />
The first wall design advanced in the last year, based<br />
upon a solution consisting in a bundle (fig. 2.9) of<br />
poloidal coaxial pipes (fig. 2.10) armoured with 4 mm<br />
thick plasma-sprayed W [2.10]. This configuration<br />
Figure 2.10 – Section of the FW model showing the<br />
poloidal coaxial pipes bundle