25.12.2014 Views

Prime pagine RA2010FUS:Copia di Layout 1 - ENEA - Fusione

Prime pagine RA2010FUS:Copia di Layout 1 - ENEA - Fusione

Prime pagine RA2010FUS:Copia di Layout 1 - ENEA - Fusione

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

082<br />

progress report<br />

2010<br />

BP<br />

Lithium JET<br />

Atom <strong>di</strong>splacement, dpa/fpy 4.7–10 –1<br />

He production, apppm/fpy 2<br />

H production, apppm/fpy 9<br />

Total heating W/cm 3 3.8–10 –1<br />

HFTM<br />

Atom <strong>di</strong>splacement, dpa/fpy 54<br />

He production, apppm/fpy 598<br />

H production, apppm/fpy 2742<br />

Total heating W/cm 3 23.08<br />

Figure 3.57 – BP<br />

geometrical layout of<br />

MCNP5 code<br />

Figure 3.58 – Main of the<br />

outcomes of the neutronic<br />

calculations on the BP<br />

superimposed mesh tally<br />

(EVEDA) lithium loop concept, the new design has been generated by enlarging the width of the lithium<br />

flow channel from the 100 mm of the EVEDA loop target to the actual IFMIF <strong>di</strong>mensions (260 mm) and<br />

mo<strong>di</strong>fying all other <strong>di</strong>mensions accor<strong>di</strong>ngly in order to fit the new channel size. The channel profile that has<br />

been implemented is the variable–curvature profile (with no straight sections) formerly designed by <strong>ENEA</strong>.<br />

As to the EVEDA design, the channel profile has now been entirely placed on the BP instead of <strong>di</strong>stributing<br />

it in between the BP and the interface frame. This solution is aimed at eliminating manufacturing problems<br />

and alignment issues between the two components.<br />

A first design optimization has been reached by eliminating all the unnecessary material in order to reduce<br />

the weight as much as possible. This preliminary design has been assessed from the neutronic point of view.<br />

Next step will be a thermo-mechanical assessment in order to evaluate the stress field in the componente,<br />

thus optimizing the design features on this basis.<br />

2) Neutronic calculations. In order to quantify the material damage due to neutron irra<strong>di</strong>ation the following was<br />

determined:<br />

a) Heat deposition due to neutron and gamma interactions with nuclides.<br />

b) Ra<strong>di</strong>ation damage (quantified by the number of dpa.<br />

c) Gas production, e.g. total production of helium and hydrogen produced by neutron induced<br />

nuclearreactions.<br />

Preliminary neutron/gamma transport calculations have been performed for the BP via MCNP5 code,<br />

version 1.4 (fig. 3.57).<br />

The neutron induced cross section data files used in the calculations have been taken mainly from INPE–50<br />

library, developed at INPE–Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), for neutron energies up to 50 MeV,<br />

and LANL–150N, developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory, for neutron energies up to 150 MeV.<br />

The BP profile was approximated in MCNP5 code through a combination of cylinders parallel to X<br />

(horizontal) axis. Mapping on the BP through “superimposed mesh tally” feature of MCNP5 has been used<br />

(fig. 3.58).<br />

DEMO R&D in the Broader Approach activities<br />

Development of CiC composite materials (task T1–2–5). In the framework of the Broader Approach activities<br />

for the development of composite SiC materials, <strong>ENEA</strong> laboratories have completed the experimental plan<br />

and the preliminary design of the test apparatus aimed at studying the erosion/corrosion of SiC composites<br />

into PbLi.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!